a reply to:
network dude
I feel like I have to ask, do you think Trump and his supporters are not "reasoned people"?
I would like to respond to this, too.
The question, as phrased, lumps Trump and his supporters into a single category. I don’t think this is reflective of the true situation. Many Trump
supporters feel that he speaks for them; no doubt he does, but not for all of them, and not all the time. Some Trumpites even believe he’s ‘one of
us’, and that isn’t true either. Trump is a very unusual person, and what he wants may not be exactly what his supporters want, or what they think
they’ll get from him. Be that as it may, I should like to answer the question with respect to Trump supporters only, and leave the psychoanalysis of
Donald Trump to those who know him better than I.
Are Trump supporters reasoning, reasonable people? For the most part, by normal standards, of course they are.
However, many reasoning, reasonable people have no trouble believing things that don’t stand to reason, things that, to other people, can seem
irrational, fantastical and false. Nobody locks these believers up in insane asylums, though; nobody doubts,
ipso facto, the rationality of
their views and judgements on any subject that
doesn’t involve their beliefs.
I speak, of course, of the religious. Religious beliefs can seem absurd and obviously false to people who don’t share them. But − to everyone
except the militantly atheistic, and those who believe fanatically in a different faith − nobody thinks the people who hold them are crazy. Religion
(like love, like fandom) is one of those spheres of human activity that provide a relatively safe outlet for our inherent irrationality. Only
relatively safe, mark you; still, for every spit-flying Islamist or born-again abortion-clinic bomber, there are millions of decent, harmless
Muslims and Evangelicals who hurt no-one, and to whom their faith is an indispensable solace and stay.
However, the therapeutic exercise of sanctioned irrationality is only even relatively safe when it is confined within the bounds that separate our
loves, our passions and our faith from the practical departments of everyday life. When it crosses those boundaries, vast damage ensues.
Democratic government and the administration of states are among the practical departments of life in which irrationality has no place.
Trumpism, looked at ‘from the outside’ as you have been urging us to do, is a tsunami of irrationality that has broken its socially sanctioned
bounds (the entertainment media and popular folklore) and inundated a department of life (government and administration) in which it can do, and
indeed has done, a vast amount of economic, social and ultimately human damage. People have made articles of faith out of Trump’s claims, denying
the evidence of history, science and contemporary reality in order to do so. However outrageous his actions and statements, they uncritically endorse
them because they are his. When it comes to the most serious issues facing the country, Trumpites don’t act according to empirical knowledge and
reasoned belief but are propelled by their emotions. They are not acting like rational people − though,
like every other person caught in the
vice of irrationality, they believe they are acting perfectly rationally.
Rather than provoke further argument by citing examples of this irrationality from current affairs and the media, let me give you one from right here
on ATS, and a personal one at that. Times without number, Trumpites on this site have called me a ‘Commie’, a Socialist, a radical or extreme
Leftist. Unless these words have ceased to mean what they have always done, these accusations are false to the point of absurdity. My politics are, by
normal standards, slightly left of centre on social issues and slightly right of centre on economic ones. But Trumpites on ATS have drifted so far
from reality that, to them, anyone who doesn’t share the MAGA platform is an extremist, a Leftist, a RINO, a Commie,
et cetera.
And so we come at last to the correct answer to your question. Trump supporters are (for the most part) rational people, but
not when they’re
being Trump supporters. On the subjects of government and the administration of the country, matters in which faith, impulse and unexamined belief
have no place, they act like religious fanatics. Often they abandon the tenets of their professed religion (Christianity) in order to do so. This is
profoundly irrational, as well as being morally wrong.
Populism is not, and never has been, a viable system of government. The train of state rattles along at a merry pace until the first bend appears in
the tracks, then it leaves the rails and makes an almighty smash. Sadly, this is a truth that people seem to have to learn over and over again,
somewhere in the world, every few years. You’d have thought that Lenin, Mussolini and Hitler between them would have made the lesson stick for a
century or two but alas, it never seems to take.
To be fair, the tendency of unreason to infect politics is very common and certainly not confined to Trump supporters. As
Spiramirabilis would
surely admit, there are people on the Left who are equally prone to let irrationality govern their politics. Some political systems appear rational in
their arguments, but if you look closer you’ll see that they are founded on irrational premises and are therefore false in and of themselves.
Trumpism is very much one of these. It is predicated, not on any real social or economic problems that exist in America (which is not to say that such
problems do not exist) but on a series of
perceived problems or ‘issues’ and proposed solutions that are only glancingly connected to real
life. The problems are either not really problems (urban crime, to take a well-documented instance) and the solutions Trump offers won’t solve them
in any case. Usually his ‘solutions’ boil down to depriving already disempowered people of their rights and hurting them, gratuitously and often
sadistically, to give satisfaction to the darker impulses of his constituency − a constituency that believes itself to be a majority. That too is a
false belief (otherwise there would have been no need to make this thread in the first place) but even if it were true, that would give Trump and his
fans no right to persecute others.
One day, a few years from now, reality will rudely awaken ordinary Trumpites from their faith-based political fantasies. If Trump wins in 2024, it
will delay the awakening for a few extra years, though only at the price of making it even more shattering when it finally arrives. But perhaps such a
radical adjustment is necessary before a viable social contract among Americans can emerge. The hangover of the Civil War has been absurdly long;
perhaps at last it is coming to an end.
edit on 30/11/23 by Astyanax because: