Israeli Academic argues we could theoretically be just 24 hours away from a nuclear war

youtu.be...

Dr Harari says the situation in the Middle East is critical and the entire region is in the greatest danger where a more generalized conflict can start at anytime. He argues that we could theoretically be just 24 hours away from a nuclear war because there is a credible threat Hezbollah and Iranian Allies could attack Israel with tens of thousands of missiles, in which case Israel will defend itself with all the weapons it has including nuclear capabilities.

He then adds this is a very dangerous moment. Indeed this is a situation where a few wrong moves could lead to a more generalised conflict and a regional war or even escalate to a global conflict. It's vital that discussions lead to the de-escalation of this crisis in the Middle East as soon as possible and a ceasefire would be the perfect starting point.

a reply to: Leviathan4

It takes more than one side with nuclear weapons to have a "nuclear war", realistically.


At the moment, Israel is the only nuclear power in the middle east.

a reply to: Leviathan4

Somebody also mentioned in the WH press conference today that there are rumors of a Chinese military facility in Iran,
so I've do doubt there is one and the war machine has been eyeballing that.
We're looking at US and its allies against the Muslim world and Russia and China.
I'll be amazed if it doesn't escalate, even if it doesn't go nuclear,
but WW3 doesn't have to be nuclear either.

As of this morning various alternative news and conspiracy sites are now unavailable / censored in Ireland.
I am unaware whether this is right across the EU so I would appreciate some feedback back there.

Nexus Newsfeed, Voltaire Network, Intelligencer.Today and various conspiracy sites like lunatic outpost are all unavailable.

I'm wondering if this a precursor to something major happening in the middle east.

Feedback anyone. ?? Windows to the ongoings outside of this pro EU, globalist serving Kakistocracy that is Ireland are now closed.

originally posted by: Mantiss2021
a reply to: Leviathan4

It takes more than one side with nuclear weapons to have a "nuclear war", realistically.


At the moment, Israel is the only nuclear power in the middle east.

True... But

LINK

According to U.S. intelligence assessments as of late last month, Iran has the capacity to produce nuclear weapons “at some point,” but has halted its nuclear weapons program and has not mastered all of the necessary technologies for building the weapons

LINK

Iran has enough enriched uraniam to build ‘several’ nuclear weapons

a reply to: Crispan

I'm in France and tried accessing Voltaire, Nexus and Lunatic without problems. Considering France is quite happy to censor (RT, Sputniknews, Rumble) your difficulties seem to be of a more local nature.

As to the OP I'd argue that Captain Obvious is being obvious. The real question is for which parties/players a larger conflict is actually the desired outcome.

Explanation: I laid out how Iran could make a primitive nuke , here on ATS , in 2011, over a decade ago ...

[Through the Looking Glass] Samson and Delilah Redux!

Personal Disclosure: It was doable back then and they have had over a decade to come up with the wherewithal to not only produce one but also deploy it effectively.

As for being 24hrs away from being nuked, I disagree because the world is merely 45mins away from being nuked into oblivion at anytime, which is the time an ICBM takes to travel from 1 side of the earth to the other side.

We are only 90 seconds from midnite on the doomsday clock ...

Doomsday clock

And it would only take 100 nukes to destroy the world as we know it ...

Doomsday warning: It would only take 100 nuclear weapons to wreak global devastation



Having lived under the cold war ... this is all to be expected ok!

Dr Harari isn't spouting anything new at all!

a reply to: Mantiss2021

At the moment, Israel is the only nuclear power in the middle east.

If I understand correctly the US as per their own laws aren't allowed to supply weapons to a country with a nuclear arsenal.

And Israel has as far as I know never come clean about their nuclear weapons even though we all know they do have them.

a reply to: Leviathan4
Yuval Noah Harari is WEF favourite and Klaus Schwab side-kick. Globalist fear ramping during the C19 debacle, fear ramping now, supporter of the 'great reset'.

He has postulated the industrial revolutions created the working class just as AI and the touted '4th industrial revolution' will render their jobs obsolete thereby creating a 'non-working class' that he has labelled 'useless eaters' and asked, "what should we do with them?"

As to the threat of nuclear war. The pro nuclear crowd's tiresome refrain, it's just a deterrent, actually has some meaning in the Hamaz/Israel situation. Israel won't nuke Gaza, otherwise the land would be useless to them. Iran, Hezbollah, Turkey etc are not insane enough to risk nuclear retaliation for blanket bombing.

Not out of the realm of possibilities, unfortunately. I hope it never happens.

But the chant all over the world "from the river to the sea". Even chanted by a Democrat Congresswoman.
Means push all the Jewish people out of Israel and drown them in the sea.

Even students at Universities like Harvard, Cornell, etc. www.newsweek.com... threatening Jewish students on campus, even banging on a door where Jewish students were hiding trying to get to them .... well antisemitism is clearly rampant even among Democrats, progressives, liberals. Not just the people liberals accuse of being fascist anti-Semites, but among the intelligentsia and elite Democrats.

It appears there is now no where that Jewish people can be safe from those wanting them dead.

The Jewish people are backed into a corner, fighting for the survival of not just Israel, but for every Jewish person on the planet. This is worse than WWII now because there is no where that they are not being persecuted for being born into their religion.

This is horrific, this is terrible. Can it cause a nuclear war. Well if the survival of every person of your race/religion on the face of the earth were at risk of total annihalation, how do you think your race/religion would react?

a reply to: OmegaLogos

Explanation: I laid out how Iran could make a primitive nuke , here on ATS , in 2011, over a decade ago ...

really don't think they will have to resort to producing a primitive nuke. with all the money obuma, slo joe gave them, then them restarting their enrichment program, the advancements they've made, and the deal that no doubt has been struck between ol farty and the iatola assahola. they more than likely got a real proper missile or two ready to fly.

a reply to: Leviathan4

Hararis current views on the situation….

“We don’t see a campaign of just obliterating Gaza,” he said. “The situation of the Palestinian population is horrific but at least it is clear that Israel is not intending to kill as many civilians as possible. This is not what the Assad regime did in Homs and Aleppo. The only solution will come when not only is Hamas disarmed but the Palestinian people have some kind of alternative future.”

“This is not the first time the radical left, in pursuit of some fixed vision of justice, finds itself aligned with some very brutal movements and regimes.”

Speaking about the reaction from parts of the left in the US and Europe while on a visit to London, Harari said it was “shocking to hear some of the responses that did not only not condemn Hamas, but placed all responsibility on Israel” and to see “the lack of solidarity with regard to the horrific attacks on Israeli civilians”.

Is he still your hero?

originally posted by: Mantiss2021
At the moment, Israel is the only nuclear power in the middle east.

Unless you count Pakistan. It's their deterrent to India but as a Muslim nation, they're likely united with their neighbours against Israel.

originally posted by: TheSingleBillie
telligentsia and elite Democrats.

It appears there is now no where that Jewish people can be safe from those wanting them dead.

The Jewish people are backed into a corner, fighting for the survival of not just Israel, but for every Jewish person on the planet. This is worse than WWII now because there is no where that they are not being persecuted for being born into their religion.

yet another box to check in ye ole checklist of signs my man jesus spoke to be aware of....

originally posted by: VermiIion
a reply to: Leviathan4

Hararis current views on the situation….

“We don’t see a campaign of just obliterating Gaza,” he said. “The situation of the Palestinian population is horrific but at least it is clear that Israel is not intending to kill as many civilians as possible. This is not what the Assad regime did in Homs and Aleppo. The only solution will come when not only is Hamas disarmed but the Palestinian people have some kind of alternative future.”

“This is not the first time the radical left, in pursuit of some fixed vision of justice, finds itself aligned with some very brutal movements and regimes.”

Speaking about the reaction from parts of the left in the US and Europe while on a visit to London, Harari said it was “shocking to hear some of the responses that did not only not condemn Hamas, but placed all responsibility on Israel” and to see “the lack of solidarity with regard to the horrific attacks on Israeli civilians”.

Is he still your hero?

Never said he was my hero.
So a strawman argument.
You lose again.
Next

Do you still support the war?
Do you not condemn the war crimes committed by Israel? You seem to only condemn one side. I wonder why is this??

You must be very naive to think you need to be a socialist to be against the war....every sane person is against it.

hear hear sir ,...i say hear hear

originally posted by: Leviathan4

originally posted by: VermiIion
a reply to: Leviathan4

Hararis current views on the situation….

“We don’t see a campaign of just obliterating Gaza,” he said. “The situation of the Palestinian population is horrific but at least it is clear that Israel is not intending to kill as many civilians as possible. This is not what the Assad regime did in Homs and Aleppo. The only solution will come when not only is Hamas disarmed but the Palestinian people have some kind of alternative future.”

“This is not the first time the radical left, in pursuit of some fixed vision of justice, finds itself aligned with some very brutal movements and regimes.”

Speaking about the reaction from parts of the left in the US and Europe while on a visit to London, Harari said it was “shocking to hear some of the responses that did not only not condemn Hamas, but placed all responsibility on Israel” and to see “the lack of solidarity with regard to the horrific attacks on Israeli civilians”.

Is he still your hero?

Never said he was my hero.
So a strawman argument.
You lose again.
Next

Do you still support the war?
Do you not condemn the war crimes committed by Israel? You seem to only condemn one side. I wonder why is this??

You must be very naive to think you need to be a socialist to be against the war....every sane person is against it.

originally posted by: Mantiss2021
a reply to: Leviathan4

It takes more than one side with nuclear weapons to have a "nuclear war", realistically.


At the moment, Israel is the only nuclear power in the middle east.

i read somewhere that the Saudi's paid Iran for their nuke project to get up and running and supplied and they got the first few bombs, Iran for sure has a few bombs are you crazy? why else stir up the bees nest and why so openly aggitate Israel.


you know the saying mess around and find out.

hopefully the US has something else in its quiver to project our power, i wonder if Iran started getting hit with US weapons if Russia, China and Iran would form a 'coalition' of sorts.

i fear nukes wouldn't be the only doomsday weapons on show.


Iran is 110% able to create bio warfare, nuclear and chemical seem humane compaired to a real bioweapon, like a weaponized ebola.

a reply to: Leviathan4

Nice shift of tactic there.

Israel needs to curl up and surrender to save the rest of the world?


We see you.

a reply to: Mantiss2021

Not in the Muslim world tho'.

Lets not forget Pakistan.

a reply to: TheValeyard

WW3 doesn't HAVE to be nuclear.

But it likely will.

If Muslim world, China and Russia take on the West, it is the apoppyclipse.

Im so very afraid for my grandsons. Ive never been this afraid.