What happens when Judge Chutkan jails a former POTUS

a reply to: CanadianLoudMouth

1. What were their charges they were cleared off?
2. Even if he did not give a speech that day, that said fight like hell for your country, there would have been protests. Ashli Babbitt should not have been shot. Unarmed. No threat. She did not OD like ICantBreathe guy either. They burnt down cities because of that. There were more arrests and damage in the weeks after he was elected.

that is all for other threads...for this one....

A lot of people said they would never impeach him. They did.
A lot of people said they would not raid him. They did.
A lot of people said they would not indict him. They did.
A lot of people said they would not arrest and process him. They did.
A lot of people said they would not take away his business or try to bankrupt him. They did.
A lot of people said they would not go after him for 1/6. They did.
A lot of people said he could never end up in jail. He will.

The mug shot came and went in hours.They need a new picture to share. New story. So when, not if,he does get put in a cell, he will win the next election in a landslide.

Wonder if who leaks that will get in any trouble....

a reply to: JinMI

Good point. I'd probably get thrown in jail for insurrection if I tried

a reply to: TWS1969

a reply to: grey580

We people.. We are all suckers to one lollipop or another. I think all of us need to just learn to not become addicted to which ever flavor appeals to us.

a reply to: TacoLoco75

Is that even possible?

I don't know why Trump doesn't just have others stump for him on the campaign trail and say all the things he's not allowed to say.

It's not possible unless you're so biased and brainwashed by the MSM not to see the difference in the way Trump is targeted for destruction along with anyone who shows support for him as opposed to any in the liberal party. Just compare all of the disgusting 'outrage' being shown on campuses and around the country inciting violence; they get a free pass. Just like the destruction in 2016.

'Domestic terrorists' seems to be very party specific.

Compare the RACIST/JEALOUS Chutkan, to the fair-minded Cannon.

Aileen Cannon thinks the DOJ trying to HIDE SOMETHING: www.newsweek.com...

They are, Aileen! Congrats for having keen intuition.

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
Is a murder suspect being tried for murder allowed to show up in court with a gun?

If not, why would a loud mouthed hate spewing madman accused of using that mouth to overthrow the American election be allowed to use that mouth to spew hatred while being tired for that very crime.

Wow,
There is tunnel vision ,
Then there is concrete tunnel vision.

After so many years Terry, so many years 😔

originally posted by: greendust
Trump just said that he will not follow the instruction and is willing to be jailed. Sorry - I like Trump more now than I ever have.

LOL

Yeah,President NDA is a real Nelson Mandela!

a reply to: Scubalicious

No? It made sense to me at the time of posting.

a reply to: carewemust

Yep. He's just playing the martyr card again since it works so well at fundraising.

a reply to: RazorV66

No.

The geniuses who send campaign contributions to a billionaire.

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: matafuchs
So, if you follow at all, you know a gag order has been placed on Donald Trump. A former president who is during this case is being tried regarding the rioting on January 6th.

Link

U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan said Monday she will impose a limited gag order on former president Donald Trump in advance of his election interference trial, as requested by prosecutors.

The gag order, she said in a ruling issued from the bench after a hearing, will prohibit all parties from statements “publicly targeting” special counsel Jack Smith, his staff, her staff or “any other court personnel.” Statements about the families of those individuals are “absolutely prohibited as well.

Publicly Targeting. This is a power trip. No one has been injured. There are no accounts of people being publicly harassed. If you are part of this case the former POTUS does not need to say or tweet anything to cause backlash. They are creating that themselves with the sham of a trial.

The part to watch closely is....will they sanction then actually revoke his bond?

“Of course, the real test will come if and when Trump violates the order,” she said. “Judge Chutkan said she will impose sanctions for violations, but if Trump does not respond to monetary sanctions, she has to be prepared to cancel his bond and jail him at some point.”

The current administration has raided his home.
The current administration has raided his properties.
The current administration has is tying him up in court.
The current administration is moving to remove his business license in NY.
The current administration has gone after his friends.
The current administration has rifled through his wifes panties...I mean...how much more? Plenty?
The current administration had him booked. MugShot heard around the world...where's Hunters?

If you also think The current administration, run by Obama era DC ops, is not involved you still do not see the big picture.

Will they do it...and when? How much would they sanction him with? Would they go so far as to revoke bond for someone simply applying their 1st Amendment right to free speech? His is the leading opposition candidate and The current administration is trying to silence him anyway they can.

No US citizen should be treated like this. None of us.

Actually, any US citizen with 91 State and Federal felony counts against him returned by four different Grand Juries could be expected to be treated like this.

Is being a former POTUS supposed to be a get-out-of-jail-free card?

HELL YES! Charges is all it takes for the Guilt to be assigned. The more charged, the guiltier the person. Unless they are a (D)emocrat, then it's (D)ifferent.

But bully on you for teaching us the new way of the law. It's exactly how we have been claiming, but now we have examples to point to.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: carewemust

Yep. He's just playing the martyr card again since it works so well at fundraising.

and it will work swimmingly with all this. Since the left can't win in a fair fight, they have to resort to bullsh!t like this. And everyone sees it for exactly what it is. I look forward to reading about this in history books.

a reply to: network dude

Preventing a defendant from intimidating witnesses using a very narrow gag order that is supported by case law? The horror!

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: greendust
Trump just said that he will not follow the instruction and is willing to be jailed. Sorry - I like Trump more now than I ever have.

LOL

Yeah,President NDA is a real Nelson Mandela!

How can a president of the US have an NDA?

Yup. The guy they are accusing of selling secrets was trying to prevent it from happening....

NDA article

The Post’s Ruth Marcus reported on Sunday that the staffers were required to sign the agreements during the early months of Trump’s presidency, promising not to share confidential information at the risk of penalty.

The agreement blocked the sharing of confidential information in any form, including “the publication of works of fiction that contain any mention of the operations of the White House, federal agencies, foreign governments, or other entities interacting with the United States Government that is based on confidential information.”

Lock ..him...up...

a reply to: CanadianLoudMouth

I dont need Trump or anyone else to tell me the election was corrupted. I truly don't know for fact who won. And I'm certainly not alone.

It was the mass mail-out/mail-in vote that was NOT approved by state legs, but simply implemented by state SoS. Which means, they had no plan at all validate millions of signatures. NONE. Because the machines failed, and there were too many to hand validate.

Sorry, but this is a fact. Nobody needs to tell me this was corrupt. I know it for myself!

Im frankly offended that sheep need to tell a wolf to think for themselves.

Link

Katyal added, “So I think that there is no doubt in my mind that there will be a gag order imposed on Donald Trump. And there also is no doubt in my mind that he is going to violate it repeatedly. Repeatedly to the point where a judge is going to have to confront the ultimate question, are we going to put the former president in jail? and i think there is only one answer to that.”

Anchor Jen Psaki said, “What is your answer?”

Katyal said, “Which is you have to. If he continues this behavior, no other litigant in this country would ever be able to do what he is doing. Judges, I don’t care what your politics are, the one thing you understand when you put out that robe is that it is about the legitimacy of the court and about the judicial process.”

it is coming....

a reply to: matafuchs

10/29/2023

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) says a Trump MUZZLE GAG ORDER is Not Constitutional.

fox5sandiego.com...