What happens when Judge Chutkan jails a former POTUS

a reply to: shooterbrody

You will note that I did not tell you or anyone what to post. I asked if you were capable of staying on topic, you remember the forum guidelines?

He did break the partial gag order? Please tell me when and where he broke them so I might read up on it.

a reply to: djz3ro

You do the same thing but you vilify him so you can signal to your virtue points.

Kinda #ing hilarious but hey, when in scotland.

PS: I'm Scottish way back. Be offended.

a reply to: djz3ro

Cool Story.

originally posted by: Lysergic
PS: I'm Scottish way back. Be offended.

So what you mean is you are American
🤣

a reply to: matafuchs

Since Chutkan and several other high ranking people are looking at severe retribution come 2025, they may as well give it all they've got right now.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: greendust

He's employing the same strategy that he's using in New York. He knows he can't win the case on legal grounds so he's attempting to agitate the judge to the point that they make a mistake so he can argue judicial misconduct on appeal.

Dont care, I will vote for him. Hell, even like a Democrat, if I can, I will vote twice.

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
Is a murder suspect being tried for murder allowed to show up in court with a gun?

If not, why would a loud mouthed hate spewing madman accused of using that mouth to overthrow the American election be allowed to use that mouth to spew hatred while being tired for that very crime.

[snipped]

What else does CNN etc tell you to think and feel?

I guess the left never invoked any violence with their rhetoric, calling for people to act?

www.cnn.com...

thehill.com...

There are too many to post, but go ahead with hurt feelz

originally posted by: greendust

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: greendust

He's employing the same strategy that he's using in New York. He knows he can't win the case on legal grounds so he's attempting to agitate the judge to the point that they make a mistake so he can argue judicial misconduct on appeal.

Dont care, I will vote for him. Hell, even like a Democrat, if I can, I will vote twice.

I wonder if I can get any of my dead relatives to vote for him.

a reply to: shooterbrody

You may have wanted to actually read the SCOTUS opinion instead of stopping at the first paragraph of the syllabus.

a reply to: djz3ro

I see that as well. However that brings up the question of is he stretching this for his own cause? Is he trying to goad a judge in to jailing him to play upon the victim image he is fashioning for himself?

originally posted by: greendust

originally posted by: greendust

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: greendust

He's employing the same strategy that he's using in New York. He knows he can't win the case on legal grounds so he's attempting to agitate the judge to the point that they make a mistake so he can argue judicial misconduct on appeal.

Dont care, I will vote for him. Hell, even like a Democrat, if I can, I will vote twice.

I wonder if I can get any of my dead relatives to vote for him.

you can order thousands of fake ballots from China and have any name you want on them!

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

I am strictly talking about the gag order. Wondering when he will be jailed for it because he is not going to listen.

I have also always stated in these forums if there is 'actual' evidence and he is found guilty of a criminal charge he should go to jail. I am not a fan boy or a worshiper. I liked his policy. He did more with what he had in a few years than any politician in the modern era.

I am just wondering if they will have the actual balls to revoke his bond.