More Bad News about mRNA "Vaccines"

There seems to be a possibility that mRNA vaccines can permanently change a person's DNA.

Scientists ‘shocked’ and ‘alarmed’ at what’s in the mRNA shots

Early in 2023, genomics scientist Kevin McKernan made an accidental discovery. While running an experiment in his Boston lab, McKernan used some vials of mRNA Pfizer and Moderna Covid vaccines as controls. He was ‘shocked’ to find that they were allegedly contaminated with tiny fragments of plasmid DNA.

McKernan, who has 25 years’ experience in his field, ran the experiment again, confirming that the vials contained up to, in his opinion, 18-70 times more DNA contamination than the legal limits allowed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

In particular, McKernan was alarmed to find the presence of an SV40 promoter in the Pfizer vaccine vials. This is a sequence that is, ‘…used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies,’ McKernan explains. This is something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines.

These findings are being confirmed by other scientists.

Other scientists soon confirmed McKernan’s findings, though the amount of DNA contamination was variable, suggesting inconsistency of vial contents depending on batch lots. One of these scientists was cancer genomics expert Dr Phillip Buckhaults, who is a proponent of the mRNA platform and has received the Pfizer Covid vaccine himself.

In September of this year, Dr Buckhaults shared his findings in South Carolina Senate hearing. ‘I’m kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine – it’s different from RNA, because it can be permanent,’ he told those present. ‘There is a very real hazard,’ he said, that the contaminant DNA fragments will integrate with a person’s genome and become a ‘permanent fixture of the cell’ leading to autoimmune problems and cancers in some people who have had the vaccinations. He also noted that these genome changes can ‘last for generations’.

Between bad research and development practices, rushed to market regulatory approvals, to at home do-it-yourselfer's, I can't help but think that it's only a matter on time before we contaminant the entire human gene pool.

a reply to: IndieA

I can't help but think that it's only a matter on time before we contaminant the entire human gene pool.

Already done; goal accomplished. Scientists have create an entire world full of human guinea pigs and lab rats to fast tract their research.

Now well see if their hopes and theories on creating a cancer vaccine come to fruition much faster than animal testing would allow.

a reply to: IndieA

Well this is nothing surprising, when I first heard they were using RNA in injections and later read even the creator of the technology did NOT approve of this use of it I knew that something was wrong.

Later a Swedish team of scientists found evidence of reverse transcription of the RNA into the DNA of liver tissue thus confirming some frequency of actual transcription was occurring.

Also another alarm bell was how the corporations behind these shot's were given immunity from prosecution by various governments and already being suspicious of our less than benign leaders due to there involvement and signing up with SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT goals of the ruling elite of the world which entail CUTTING there populations and making there own economy's ground to a halt and even collapse I lost all faith in our leaders knowing that a the criminal elite whom are currently pulling the strings of our leaders are calling the shots in rich mans clubs like the Davos, Bilderberg and other such meetings were they hammer out what they are all going to do to the rest of us like our lives are worthless and we are only there for their benefit which of course we are NOT.

Basically I think that this will be all pushed under the carpet but in a truly just world there would be crimes trials going on right now on a scale not seen since Nuremburg.

Remember also how they struck down a professor whom had sold his own formerly successful biotechnology firm and bought himself a state of the art biological lab out of his pocket money and whom created his own vaccine, a traditional vaccine no mRNA involved only to then be prosecuted and lied about by the German authority's.

So they wanted this mRNA in your body for a reason and I suspect Covid was only the smokescreen to do so, a bad flu indeed but nothing worse than that and not the pandemic it was made out to be, yes people died from it but how many did we hear of dying straight after the shot's they were given or within a short time or falling over playing sport even top athletes with sudden cardiac arrest, stroke's and other complications due to these vile creations.

Most that administered them and most that took them believed it was the right thing to do due to the complete brainwashing of our public but in fact it was a huge run out of an untrialled technology with potentially dire consequences for the future of humanity.

Personally if it is as harmless as they say I would like to replace the placebo most of these elites were given and inject them with verified Covid mRNA shot's, booster shot's of the same and second booster shots of the same to see how they like it, they would pretty quickly change their tune if they had to imbibe there own poison believe me.

Many will suffer life long problems from this experiment, many will have there lives cut short, it is even said that the shot caused fertility issues in mothers and could trigger their body's rejection of their unborn baby's as the hyperactive immune response attacked the foetus and led to miscarriage and surely reducing global fertility permanently is a sure fire way to meet those sustainable population targets.

I thought the entire FUNCTION OF an RNA based injectable (because they are not vaccinations and nobody claims they are, that’s fact not conspiracy theory, IS TO REWRITE DNA!

Since the results were replicated and more than one scientific group were involved in proving his conclusions, I will accept his conclusions as to the contamination. Also I have read about that kind of contamination resulting in some auto-immune disfunction before this a few years back, possibly before this vaccine was even developed, and this association he talks about was considered a problem back then. So his conclusions about the effect with autoimmune problems is probly correct. I do not know about the cancer part, but often autoimmune conditions are triggered by foreign elements in our cells, so his conclusion that cancer can occur if autoimmunity does not destroy the mutated cells is probably relevant.

This does not sound very good to me.

a reply to: IndieA
My question is: Who's DNA, or what type of DNA has it been contaminated with. What was the intended outcome?

Was humanities gene pool ever contaminated before, and what was done to correct that?


From Wikipedia:

While chromosomes are large and contain all the essential genetic information for living under normal conditions, plasmids are usually very small and contain only additional genes that may be useful in certain situations or conditions. Artificial plasmids are widely used as vectors in molecular cloning, serving to drive the replication of recombinant DNA sequences within host organisms. I

a reply to: visitedbythem

My question is: Who's DNA, or what type of DNA has it been contaminated with. What was the intended outcome?

Who knows? Each batch could vary.

Was humanities gene pool ever contaminated before, and what was done to correct that?

Mutations are a natural occurrence, but the discovery of genetic engineering took genetic modification possibilities to a whole new level.

Nature seems to breed out mutations over time, which is how I knew that Covid would become less harmful over time, as it reverted back into the common cold. Time and natural selection are nature's answer to mutations and genetic abominations.

To date, claims that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines can alter DNA in people lack a biologically plausible mechanism to explain how this would happen. A certain proportion of polio vaccine administered between the 1950s and 1960s were contaminated with the virus SV40, which can cause tumors in animals. However, epidemiological studies since then haven’t detected a higher risk of cancer in people who received the polio vaccine at that time period.

Preprint author’s reaction to our request for comment

We reached out to McKernan to ask for clarification regarding his claim that SV40 promoters could integrate into the human genome. McKernan didn’t respond to our email, but posted our email on Twitter.

In his Twitter thread, McKernan alleged Health Feedback is “obsessed with reducing population levels”; incorrectly claimed that we’d asserted only retroviruses can integrate into the human genome; and cited a PNAS article as evidence to support his claim, stating that “If non-retrovirus mRNA can integrate, DNA is even easier”.

The PNAS article in question, authored by Zhang et al., detected parts of the SARS-CoV-2 genome integrated into the genome of an immortalized human cell line (cells that can proliferate indefinitely like HeLa cells), following infection by SARS-CoV-2[9].

healthfeedback.org... es-alter-dna-people/

originally posted by: AlexandrosTheGreat
I thought the entire FUNCTION OF an RNA based injectable (because they are not vaccinations and nobody claims they are, that’s fact not conspiracy theory, IS TO REWRITE DNA!

I think everyone pushing them calls them vacinations.

a reply to: IndieA

Yeah, every legitimate scientist publishes their findings to Twitter (X) and substack.

a reply to: IndieA

This is to scary for an "I told you so" but I kept my family and most
of the people I know away from the shot completely. Because I don't
trust man. Not for a cancer cure, not to experiment on humanity, not
to defend my rights, not to enslave rape kidnap and murder us.

When men can get away with all of this? Do not doubt they will.

originally posted by: AlexandrosTheGreat
I thought the entire FUNCTION OF an RNA based injectable (because they are not vaccinations and nobody claims they are, that’s fact not conspiracy theory, IS TO REWRITE DNA!

That isn't the way RNA works.

Primarily, RNA takes coding from DNA in the nucleous of the cell and then carries it to the ribosomes outside of the nucleous of the cell, where it can produce amino acids. Those amino acids chained together are the proteins we are made up of. But the messaging from RNA doesn't go backwards into the nucleous and change the DNA.

a reply to: IndieA

Here's a theory for you:

To get enough DNA to test for, the amount in the samples has to be amplified so it is at detectable thresholds. The process used to amplify DNA is the polymerase amplification process (PCR) that so many COVID-19 conspiracy theorists denied was useful for testing because it could potentially produce false positives after ridiculously high numbers of amplification cycles.

Since this 'scientist' did not include the details of his process, as would have been mandatory in any rigorous scientific study, perhaps he just ran the amplification phase until he got a result, rather than doing the more normal 28-40 cycles?

And as for the potential of DNA in the injectables, every living cell, for every living, thing contains DNA. It is everywhere. When we breathe out we breathe out bits of DNA, when we touch stuff, we leave traces of DNA (as any forensic pathologist would tell you). So it is easy to accidentally contaminate even the cleanest of samples. The question is, was there enough DNA to make any sort of noticeable difference to the billions of cells it would be swamped by in the body?

When we eat, we consume vast amounts of DNA, a full genome in every cell, some of which will pass into our bloodstream and cells because it is lipid encapsulated (the same delivery method for the mRNA immunizations). No-one seems to be worried about that source of foreign DNA. And it doesn't seem to be mutating us with every meal.

a reply to: visitedbythem

You remember Epstein?

He had this dream to have the whole of humanity genetically transformed to have HIS genes.

a reply to: chr0naut

This article describes mRNA delivery methods:

Without these lipid shells, there would be no mRNA vaccines for COVID-19

I'll continue to pass on this relatively new technology.

Here's supporting evidence of the possibility of mRNA rewriting DNA.

Will an RNA Vaccine Permanently Alter My DNA?

MIT & Harvard Study Suggests mRNA Vaccine Might Permanently Alter DNA After All

This company sells gene editing and gene replacement mRNA:

Trilink Biotech

This article claims that it's highly improbable, but I guess not impossible:

Can the COVID vaccine “change” a person’s DNA?

Multiple molecular checks ensure that the COVID-19 vaccine does not affect human DNA, thus, the chances of this occurring are highly improbable

I hope those multiple checks are being done, and done properly.

More evidence of the possibility of reverse transcription:

Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line

originally posted by: IndieA
a reply to: chr0naut

This article describes mRNA delivery methods:

Without these lipid shells, there would be no mRNA vaccines for COVID-19

I'll continue to pass on this relatively new technology.

I edited my previous response, which provides an answer of sorts.

Lipid encapsulation is usually achieved by agitating the vector molecule in a solution of water and fats (lipids). It is something that happens all the time in nature. In fact, it is thought that perhaps the abiogenic creation of life was the lipid encapsulation of amino acid molecules which created the first cell-like structures.

a reply to: chr0naut

When we eat, we consume vast amounts of DNA, a full genome in every cell, some of which will pass into our bloodstream and cells because it is lipid encapsulated (the same delivery method for the mRNA immunizations). No-one seems to be worried about that source of foreign DNA. And it doesn't seem to be mutating us with every meal.

I agree, but the source from the OP mentioned SV40 being the vehicle in which DNA could enter a cell's nucleus.

originally posted by: IndieA
a reply to: chr0naut

This article describes mRNA delivery methods:

Without these lipid shells, there would be no mRNA vaccines for COVID-19

I'll continue to pass on this relatively new technology.

Here's supporting evidence of the possibility of mRNA rewriting DNA.

Will an RNA Vaccine Permanently Alter My DNA?

MIT & Harvard Study Suggests mRNA Vaccine Might Permanently Alter DNA After All

This company sells gene editing and gene replacement mRNA:

Trilink Biotech

This article claims that it's highly improbable, but I guess not impossible:

Can the COVID vaccine “change” a person’s DNA?

Multiple molecular checks ensure that the COVID-19 vaccine does not affect human DNA, thus, the chances of this occurring are highly improbable

I hope those multiple checks are being done, and done properly.

More evidence of the possibility of reverse transcription:

Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line

Of course, reverse transcriptases could inadvertently be present and there be some RNA written back to our DNA, but it is important to realize where these sequences are most likely to be added. They are most likely to be added at the ends of the DNA strands, the telomeres. They would not be inserted into the existing DNA in core sequences unless there is something that cuts the DNA sequence at a specific point that would not render the DNA strand inviable. Most genetic engineering utilizes ways to insert sequences at very specific locations because there are multiple natural integrity checks on DNA.

originally posted by: IndieA
a reply to: chr0naut

When we eat, we consume vast amounts of DNA, a full genome in every cell, some of which will pass into our bloodstream and cells because it is lipid encapsulated (the same delivery method for the mRNA immunizations). No-one seems to be worried about that source of foreign DNA. And it doesn't seem to be mutating us with every meal.

I agree, but the source from the OP mentioned SV40 being the vehicle in which DNA could enter a cell's nucleus.

SV40 is a virus and is RNA. It would not be in the form of DNA. However, perhaps the 'scientist' saw sequences from the SV40 virus, but expressed as a DNA analogue? The incongruities such as this, in the original account seems to raise questions of validity, does it not?

It is something that happens all the time in nature

.
a reply to: chr0naut

A couple of things.
First, it would be one thing to have it be a natural process but in this instance it is far from a natural process and the experts, the doctors and scientists, they all said the covid-19 "vaccine" would not alter our DNA and second thing is the covid-19 "vaccine" has done so much harm.

So it is just another confirmation that when they, Fauci, the msm and the rest marginalized people calling them conspiracy theorists for pointing out the untested covid-19 "vaccine" was really a DNA altering gene therapy concoction they were lying and now well we are suppose to be ok with it.

When we eat, we consume vast amounts of DNA, a full genome in every cell, some of which will pass into our bloodstream and cells because it is lipid encapsulated (the same delivery method for the mRNA immunizations). No-one seems to be worried about that source of foreign DNA. And it doesn't seem to be mutating us with every meal.

Well it might have something to do with the covid-19 "vaccine" being made in a lab and just about everything it does from traveling to the brain and other organs, blood clots, myocarditus etc..the experts, doctors and scientists said it wouldn't do. They laughed and mocked people for saying it is gene therapy and will alter your DNA.