Rumble refuses to demonetize Russell Brand after receiving pressures by the UK Government

originally posted by: Saloon


Truly sick beyond how anyone lived in the past, what world they
once belonged to or what sixteen yo old slut he once slept with.

may i ask what makes her a 16 year old slut?

It takes 2 to tango, why do you label her as a slut for sleeping with him?

Brand himself has not called her a slut why is your opinion of her so much more derogatory than his?

a reply to: Saloon

My opinion is.....

Just as irrelevant as mine.

I don't understand the crowd you identify with as seen time and time again.

What crowd do I 'identify' with?

It is willing to sacrifice civil rights across the board.....

Am I?
You know nothing about me.

.....and a better way of life....

Exactly what 'better way of life' are you alluding to?

.....all for nothing more than who they hate.

Please elaborate.

....or what sixteen yo old slut he once slept with.

So its all the 'sixteen year old sluts' fault?
Is that what you're really implying?
Or that a young, impressionable girl who was taking in by a 30 odd year old 'celebrity' must automatically be a 'slut' and Brand should be excused and exonerated for using his position and 'stardom' to manipulate, use and exploit her?

Which hardly makes him a pervert considering most anyone living in that same world even as we speak. R.Kelly absolutely.

Yes, R. Kelly seems to be a horrible person as well.
Lots of disgusting, horrible, manipulative pieces of # in the 'entertainment' business and other positions of influence.
Unfortunately quite a few nonces as well.
What's your point?

You seem quite angry.

a reply to: UpThenDown

16 yo out partying it up with the hollywood crowd sleeping with older guys.
And no shame in rehashing the past with old allegations. All at the whim of
a corroboration between the UK gov. and the MSM.

What do you think would be more appropriate? Should I call her a school girl?

What's this now? Brand exposed himself to female colleagues...PLURAL!

The BBC is itself urgently investigating allegations about Brand’s conduct during the period he hosted radio shows for the corporation in the noughties. Brand has been accused of exposing himself to female colleagues.

deadline.com...

a reply to: Freeborn

So its all the 'sixteen year old sluts' fault?
Is that what you're really implying?
Or that a young, impressionable girl who was taking in by a 30 odd year old 'celebrity' must automatically be a 'slut' and Brand should be excused and exonerated for using his position and 'stardom' to manipulate, use and exploit her?

Oh wait you're right, okay Brand was also a slut at that time.

Feel better?

You seem quite angry.

Oh yes I'm completely losing it right now because we disagree. lol

GTFO with that!

a reply to: quintessentone

What's this now? Brand exposed himself to female colleagues...PLURAL

But never showered with his own daughter.

originally posted by: quintessentone


I'm not going off topic with Kelly all I will say again is Downing Street must have something on him.

No, all they said is they found the accusations serious - which they are.

"Quintessentone beats and kills puppies" is a serious and disturbing allegation. Doesn't mean it's true.

At this point what Brand did or did not do is irrelevant.

If you gathered about a bunch of people who a threats to society and shot them dead - I'm sure there might be a few real threats in the bunch - still doesn't make it right.

This has to do with a coordinated effort to dig up dirt and use government power to silence dissenters.

originally posted by: quintessentone


There may never be a legal bill but he's asking for money now.

Never be a legal bill? They accused the guy on National tv of vile acts and people from the government were campaigning to stop his income.

Based on this alone he has massive legals bills!

For those of us who have ever worked in business, we understand that a sudden stop in income can make even what appears to be rich owner's bankrupt.

Availability of cash does not equal assets. People own their homes but if you need cash in a few days, you couldn't come up with it right away.

So here is the common way it happens: the sudden loss of income triggers loans to become immediately due. You can't pay this even if you have the assets, your creditors force a bankruptcy. Most businesses under 100 million usually require the owners to be personally liable, they sell the owners assets to pay for the business, the actual payments for the sale of assets usually are just a percentage of the original estimate.

Now you have zero assets - extremely common situation. They even went after his wife to try to stop her income.

originally posted by: quintessentone
What's this now? Brand exposed himself to female colleagues...PLURAL!

The BBC is itself urgently investigating allegations about Brand’s conduct during the period he hosted radio shows for the corporation in the noughties. Brand has been accused of exposing himself to female colleagues.

deadline.com...

For how long he will be jailed for this new allegation?

Does it have to go through the courts if there is substance to these allegations or he has already been convicted?

a reply to: quintessentone

Interesting link. So. Some viewers have complained to the BBC about too much coverage of the RB allegations?

Sounds almost as if they are trying to hush it up?

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: quintessentone
What's this now? Brand exposed himself to female colleagues...PLURAL!

The BBC is itself urgently investigating allegations about Brand’s conduct during the period he hosted radio shows for the corporation in the noughties. Brand has been accused of exposing himself to female colleagues.

deadline.com...

For how long he will be jailed for this new allegation?

Does it have to go through the courts if there is substance to these allegations or he has already been convicted?

Just pointing out new revelations from investigators, so now there are more than one woman he exposed himself to at a workplace, but nothing to see here folks.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: quintessentone

Interesting link. So. Some viewers have complained to the BBC about too much coverage of the RB allegations?

Sounds almost as if they are trying to hush it up?

Where did you see those complaints? That site is a maze.

originally posted by: Daughter2
POST REMOVED BY STAFF

Absolutely not, the complaints are important to me because they may be counter complaints and therefore cause Ofcam reason to think twice about regulating certain content.

And there's a danger about having the so called majority rule over free speech.

The majority of the population do not support transgendered people.

Should they be able to get together and report it to the government?

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: quintessentone
What's this now? Brand exposed himself to female colleagues...PLURAL!

The BBC is itself urgently investigating allegations about Brand’s conduct during the period he hosted radio shows for the corporation in the noughties. Brand has been accused of exposing himself to female colleagues.

deadline.com...

For how long he will be jailed for this new allegation?

Does it have to go through the courts if there is substance to these allegations or he has already been convicted?

Just pointing out new revelations from investigators, so now there are more than one woman he exposed himself to at a workplace, but nothing to see here folks.

Allegations it's the correct word.
There could be many allegations and more to come late on but Rumble will not demonetize anyone based on unproven allegations by anonymous people.

Even if Brand was found guilty for some of these allegations them that isn't automatically exuding him from making money online or offline. There is no law that prevents him or others from making money even if they're convicted.