It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Rumble's CEO Chris Pavlovski responded to a letter from a committee chair in the United Kingdom parliament, who asked if Russell Brand will be able to make money on his platform following explosive accusations of sexual impropriety against Brand, according to a statement posted to Rumble’s Twitter.
While we recognise that Rumble is not the creator of the content published by Mr. Brand, we are concerned that he may be able to profit from his content on the platform.
We would be grateful if you could confirm whether Mr. Brand is able to monetise his content, including his videos relating to the serious accusations against him. If so, we would like to know whether Rumble intends to join YouTube in suspending Mr. Brand’s ability to earn money on the platform.
Today we received an extremely disturbing letter from a committee chair in the UK Parliament
While Rumble obviously deplores sexual assault, rape, and all serious crimes, and believes that both alleged victims and the accused are entitled to a full and serious investigation, it is vital to note that recent allegations against Russell Brand have nothing to do with content on Rumble’s platform.
Just yesterday, YouTube announced that, based solely on these media accusations, it was baring Mr Brand from monetizing his video content. Rumble stands for very different values. We have devoted ourselves to the vital cause of defending a free internet - meaning an internet where no one arbitrarily dictates which ideas can or cannot be heard, or which citizens may or may not be entitled to a platform.
We regard it as deeply inappropriate and dangerous that the UK Parliament would attempt to control who is allowed to speak on our platform or to earn a living from doing so. Singling out an individual and demanding his ban is even more disturbing given the absence of any connection between the allegations and his content on Rumble. We don’t agree with the behaviour of many Rumble creators, but we refuse to penalize them for actions that have nothing to do with our platform.
Although it may be politically and socially easier for Rumble to join a cancel culture mob, doing so would be a violation of our company's values and mission. We emphatically reject the U.K. Parliament’s demands
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: AlienBorg
Good for Rumble.
This sh!t is ridiculous. The UK just sent a letter to TikTok asking if Brand is still monetized on their platform.
A guy who is still innocent until proven guilty. Meanwhile the Taliban, CCP, and PLA are free to push any BS they want.
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: AlienBorg
Good for Rumble.
This sh!t is ridiculous. The UK just sent a letter to TikTok asking if Brand is still monetized on their platform.
A guy who is still innocent until proven guilty. Meanwhile the Taliban, CCP, and PLA are free to push any BS they want.
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: AlienBorg
Good for Rumble.
This sh!t is ridiculous. The UK just sent a letter to TikTok asking if Brand is still monetized on their platform.
A guy who is still innocent until proven guilty. Meanwhile the Taliban, CCP, and PLA are free to push any BS they want.
Also, it seems like the leftists and globalists are a lot more concerned with Brand than the Epstein client list.
originally posted by: AlienBorg
voz.us...
British government demands social media platforms to demonetize Russell Brand, Rumble refuses to comply.
The British actor and podcaster was accused of abuse and rape, which is why YouTube has already removed his program from its platform.
originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: AlienBorg
Good for Rumble. If all it took was an accusation…why hasn’t most everyone In Hollywood and the majority of politicians been demonetized. What about Bill Gates and his Bridge player?
They only make their own decadence more obvious when they go after those brave enough to shine a light on it.
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
originally posted by: nerbot
a reply to: AlienBorg
What a perfect way to remove RUMBLE from normal UK internet as a source.
It was banned here in France years ago!
The UK tried to f# with the US before and it didn't end well for them.
originally posted by: nerbot
a reply to: AlienBorg
What a perfect way to remove RUMBLE from normal UK internet as a source.
It was banned here in France years ago!