Russell Brand denies 'serious criminal allegations' he claims are being made against him

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: quintessentone

Only one?

Katherine Ryan:

www.dailymail.co.uk...

The Canadian comic and writer told Louis Theroux that she had confronted the unnamed man while they worked together on a TV show in front of the audience 'again and again'.

A report on media website Deadline reported that Ms Ryan called out Brand during Roast Battle, which is screened on Comedy Central though her allegations did not make the final edit.

Good for her, but someone edited it out of the show. Why was it edited out, I wonder?

originally posted by: Saloon
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

One of said "groupies" was 16 at the time.

Oh I see now groupies can't be sixteen. I suppose they can't be whores either
as long they prescribe to your ideology?

No, they can't be 16 year olds that need to be groomed first.

a reply to: quintessentone

Go figure?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: quintessentone

Go figure?

I have go figured and it seems it is the same 'ole backward tactics from decades ago and women are afraid to come forward because of the backlash.

a reply to: quintessentone

So, who edited her comment?

a reply to: quintessentone

I mentioned way back on page 3 of this thread which has now just become the usual ATS bickering crap

These are not new revaluations to many on the comedy circuit , this stuff predates brand and his standing up to the man YouTube channel

Of course his defenders will think it’s all new and made up because US elections , well duh, whereas if you want to look at it critically, look into comments by

“fellow Comedians, Fern Bardy, Stewart Lee, Katherine Ryan and Jimmy carr have made comments in the past about him being a little to touch feely without permission in the past, way before this documentry and his defense, its not a new thing “

All from years and years ago, from even before brand was a darling of so many on ATS and YouTube

Another Truth speaker/seeker getting attacked, even while it may merit some truth his accusations (and who is totally innocent??), it's pretty obvious those in power seek to silence him and already gotten his income being deprived from you-tube (demonized), even he not is proven guilty yet.
Same thing happened with Julian Assange and many others (&youtubers)... accused of rape and an enemy of those in power.
Like for example if you show some other sides from Russia/Ukraine on social media/youtube good change you getting demonized just for that!
Then you must be a Putin lover and or a conspiracy nutty! ppl even afraid speaking their other opinion!

The same media being silent when you hear other sides in case of Julian Assange like this (old news but just showing how 1 sided the media is in such matters:

thewire.in...

he United States’ Department of Justice’s case against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange took a serious hit last week after a key witness admitted that he fabricated accusations in order to get immunity. Though these revelations were made public by an Icelandic newspaper on June 26, the mainstream media in the US has largely chosen to ignore them.

According to the bi-weekly Stundin, the witness, Sigurdur Ingi Thordarson, “has a documented history with sociopathy and has received several convictions for sexual abuse of minors and wide-ranging financial fraud”. He was recruited by US authorities in order to build a case against Assange, and misled them into believing he was a close associate of the Wikileaks founder. In reality, however, he had only “volunteered on a limited basis to raise money for Wikileaks in 2010 but was found to have used that opportunity to embezzle more than $50,000 from the organisation”, the Icelandic newspaper reports.

The US is currently seeking Assange’s extradition from the UK. If it succeeds, Assange could face up to 175 years in jail because of the charges filed against him. But now, with Thordason accepting that he fabricated his testimony, the veracity of the indictment submitted by American authorities in the UK has come under serious question.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Saloon

Try posting some then, instead of baseless sexist and misogynistic disgusting stuff?

It's often said in many forums including this one, that liberals
find the truth disgusting in an empire of lies.

a reply to: Saloon

Who's a liberal?

Calling women ageing groupies and sluts is pretty much disgusting to folk of all political persuasions.

Anyway, it's late here so good night.

Carry on.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Saloon

Try posting some then, instead of baseless sexist and misogynistic disgusting stuff?

Haven't you learned by now that when your argument is either "agree with me" or you are "insert name here" that you always lose?


I wonder why that is?

originally posted by: UpThenDown
a reply to: quintessentone

I mentioned way back on page 3 of this thread which has now just become the usual ATS bickering crap

These are not new revaluations to many on the comedy circuit , this stuff predates brand and his standing up to the man YouTube channel

Of course his defenders will think it’s all new and made up because US elections , well duh, whereas if you want to look at it critically, look into comments by

“fellow Comedians, Fern Bardy, Stewart Lee, Katherine Ryan and Jimmy carr have made comments in the past about him being a little to touch feely without permission in the past, way before this documentry and his defense, its not a new thing “

All from years and years ago, from even before brand was a darling of so many on ATS and YouTube

As one of those people put it (a woman) she said "What can I do without proof?" and "I have to feed my kids" .

Few comments on evidence:

It appears the one of the alleged accusers was in the States - this one supposedly went to a rape crisis center. In the States that information is protected under confidentiality laws - Brand can't access it unless she consents - I bet she doesn't

Text messages - unless there is a prior Court order usually aren't kept for more than a few days. Highly unlikely any will still be around after 10 years.

Unless that woman kept her phone for a decade and it stills works after all that time- I highly doubt those messages can ever be verified.

And someone mentioned those message fonts seem strange - they do to me too. I had to print text messages and it was so hard to get even one message neatly on paper. I can't say for sure because I don't know the model of the phone but they don't look like messages from 2012.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: JinMI

Pardon?

You agree with calling women ageing groupies and sluts?

Post something on topic, for a change.

Only when they are an aging woman groupie.

or a slut.



Love seeing your "excellent" lawyering abilities and skills on display......

a reply to: JinMI

Love seeing your "excellent" lawyering abilities and skills on display......

Yeah! Chuckles... forgot about that.

Do you think he might go pro bono for Mr. Brand?