Russell Brand denies 'serious criminal allegations' he claims are being made against him

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: AlienBorg

"I know he said he is a lawyer but he doesn't seem to be sticking to the ethical principles of innocent until proven guilty".

Sick and tired of you repeating lies about me.

Also, your opinions about our justice system are Ill informed and otiose .

Neither you nor I know what any evidence might be if or when any charges might arise yet here you are with your opinions.

It seems you have made your mind like andy for example. You don't seem to be sticking to the ethical principles of innocent until proven guilty.

I don't think any physical evidence can be presented 20 years after the alleged offences. For historical matters the Police usually dismiss them. Even a security guard knows this.

a reply to: Saloon

Sorry, but you calling his accusers of being "sluts" is about as gratuitously offensive as it gets?

originally posted by: WilLiam1985
a reply to: Mahogany

By "Charges" you mean accusations pushed through UNKNOWN accusers and "ACTED" out on the MSM to protect the "Annonomous" accusers...great mindset ya got there...go back to your sheeple heard.

Based ^

a reply to: AlienBorg

Why do you keep saying "based"?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: WilLiam1985

No. There are no "charges" yet.

If there are actual charges the evidence will not be "Annonomous".

"Sheeple"?!!!

Oh dear.....

But he has been named and has been condemned in the court of public opinion and in the media. Is this fair??

a reply to: AlienBorg

"It seems you have made your mind like andy for example. You don't seem to be sticking to the ethical principles of innocent until proven guilty."

Stuck record?

Quote me.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: AlienBorg

Repeating the opposite of what I've posted?

Again?

Ahem.

It is you that is proclaiming his innocence before a proper trial.

Pure double standards.

All the time.

Shocking comment!

I am sticking to the principle of innocent until proven guilty. The right thing to do.

a reply to: AlienBorg

I dint think any physical evidence can be presented 20 years after the alleged offences. For historical matters the Police usually dismiss them. Even a security guard knows this.

All roads that make a fair trial even possible are closed. Washed away by the
flood of media bias we look upon from the safety our ATS window.

Alrighty then.

originally posted by: Saloon
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Well, let's just cancel investigative journalism?

You'd never have had Nixon and Watergate exposed.

Way to go

Have you noticed that some posters on internet forums are just as sick as this
obvious media hit piece? Displaying a complete lack of humanity for a perfectly
rational good natured human being? That more than obviously was brave enough
to expose corruption at the highest elite levels across the board?

Have you noticed their complete lack of humanity as it were vacated by their
hate for even a fellow liberal? All because he's capable of much deeper thinking
than any other liberal I've come across? Have you noticed how they also employ
week attempts to make themselves appear fair at the start of a conversation?

Then completely succumb to their seething hate as they argue against what's
so obvious to normal human beings? Have you looked into their blind ignorance
of Mr. Brands own victimhood and innocense and declare it absurd to even
address?

All while embracing the unlikely victimhood of his four acussing sluts? And
make no mistake that's what they are. Aging groupies who've agreed to cash
in using accusations that will only be tried by you tube and other left wing
media outlets. All while still apart of the same world Mr. Brand found the
inner strength to leave behind him? I'm telling my good member they're
some really sick basturds out there. And it's so cookie cutter across the
web. Sick I say sick.

This is a comment that needs to be discussed.

a reply to: AlienBorg

This is a comment that needs to be discussed.

I'm right here pardner.

originally posted by: Saloon
a reply to: AlienBorg

I dint think any physical evidence can be presented 20 years after the alleged offences. For historical matters the Police usually dismiss them. Even a security guard knows this.

All roads that make a fair trial even possible are closed. Washed away by the
flood of media bias we look upon from the safety our ATS window.

Alrighty then.

It has been discussed already online.
The risk of not getting a fair trial is quite high I will say. But at the end of the day the prosecution must prove he is guilty.

And fir historical matters you need a miracle or something we don't know of.

originally posted by: Saloon
a reply to: AlienBorg

This is a comment that needs to be discussed.

I'm right here pardner.

Aging groupies who've agreed to cash
in using accusations that will only be tried by you tube and other left wing
media outlets. All while still apart of the same world Mr. Brand found the
inner strength to leave behind him? I'm telling my good member they're
some really sick basturds out there. And it's so cookie cutter across the
web. Sick I say sick.

This part of your comment.
You think there is a possibility these women have bern paid to create these stories? Let's start with this.

a reply to: AlienBorg

And fir historical matters you need a miracle or something we don't know of.

Not sure what you mean?

a reply to: AlienBorg

This part of your comment.
You think there is a possibility these women have bern paid to create these stories? Let's start with this.

Of course I do if we're speaking to possibilities.

I seem to have upset the flow for the moment.

Hmm, more accusations may be in the pipeline.

Following the release of the investigation, additional people have come forward with undisclosed allegations about Brand, claims the Times has said they are working to verify.

In addition to the reporting on the allegations, the investigation included hundreds of interviews with people who knew Brand or had previously worked with him. This reporting also included descriptions from other women of abuses by Brand, including that he flashed his penis at a person on the BBC set and that he threatened and shouted at women who refused to have sex with him. Additionally, it stated that Brand’s approach toward women was an “open secret” among those who worked with him in the industry and that past colleagues at Channel 4 felt their role was to help Brand meet young women.

Only one comedian, Daniel Sloss, spoke on the record about his knowledge of the allegations against Brand. He discussed hearing rumors about Brand and said female comedians warned each other about his predatory behavior.

www.vox.com...

a reply to: AlienBorg

"Aging groupies who've agreed to cash
in using accusations that will only be tried by you tube ...."

"Sluts" and now "ageing groupies"

One of said "groupies" was 16 at the time.

Words fail me.

a reply to: quintessentone

Only one?

Katherine Ryan:

www.dailymail.co.uk...

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

One of said "groupies" was 16 at the time.

Oh I see now groupies can't be sixteen. I suppose they can't be whores either
as long they prescribe to your ideology?