Russell Brand denies 'serious criminal allegations' he claims are being made against him

originally posted by: angelchemuel
Having scrolled past several pages of arguments.......
This latest is just breaking....
YouTube suspends monetisation of star's chanel

Rainbows
Jane

I was doing the same and noticed the only vids will
soon show only that he has been accused of rape.
So I thought I would add this one here for readers
to see what this is likely all about.

Why would the media go after Brand?



Come on man!
What a joke you tube is.

a reply to: Saloon
Trews.... the name of his 'news platform', is also a Scottish word for male tartan trousers..... pants......
Sorry, I had a giggle at that. So either the news is pants (which I think Brand is subtly saying) or he is..... depending on your view point of the man I guess

Rainbows
Jane

33 pages of this crap.

So proud.

a reply to: GENERAL EYES

What's your point?

a reply to: angelchemuel

All I previously thought about Russell Brand was simple.

" Oh how cool to see this liberal guy actually use his brain".

Now it's becoming more clear every hour they found a way to
make him "a victim" or "target". You tube couldn't wait to take
him down. Because he mastered their guidelines and still able to
make vids on their platform. Scroll his page now and it's so obvious
what you tube is doing.

originally posted by: angelchemuel
Having scrolled past several pages of arguments.......
This latest is just breaking....
YouTube suspends monetisation of star's chanel

Rainbows
Jane

Whether by design, or coincidence i'd have thought this will vastly reduce his ability to hire a top defence team

If he still does hire top dollar, then is that his personal funds, or might it reveal a wealthy supporter of his Youtube messages? If the latter might this be designed to flush out such a supporter?

Probably just Youtube wanting to distance themselves, but these are nevertheless possibilities to bear in mind

originally posted by: Saloon
a reply to: angelchemuel

All I previously thought about Russell Brand was simple.

" Oh how cool to see this liberal guy actually use his brain".

Now it's becoming more clear every hour they found a way to
make him "a victim" or "target". You tube couldn't wait to take
him down. Because he mastered their guidelines and still able to
make vids on their platform. Scroll his page now and it's so obvious
what you tube is doing.

Absolutely!

YouTube has now demonetized his channel but they haven't banned him completely. Maybe it's on the way but they need to find a really good excuse. The excuse they now found is laughable.

originally posted by: McGinty

originally posted by: angelchemuel
Having scrolled past several pages of arguments.......
This latest is just breaking....
YouTube suspends monetisation of star's chanel

Rainbows
Jane

Whether by design, or coincidence i'd have thought this will vastly reduce his ability to hire a top defence team

If he still does hire top dollar, then is that his personal funds, or might it reveal a wealthy supporter of his Youtube messages? If the latter might this be designed to flush out such a supporter?

Probably just Youtube wanting to distance themselves, but these are nevertheless possibilities to bear in mind

Even if he didn't have any money (which isn't the case) a gofundme account or any other fundme account will see many people supporting him not because they necessarily like his comedy or style but to have a fair trial.

I made a thread about a lecturer in the UK who was fired for questioning the ridiculous gender ideology and she wanted £70,000 to be able to take her case to an employment tribunal. You see in England it seems it's almost impossible to bring your case to court unless you are loaded...

She has managed now (and only after a few weeks) to raise over £70,000 thanks to the generosity of the British public. Imagine if Russell Brand was about to make a similar account asking to be funded..

Btw in this thread of mine the usual suspects didn't appear to support the University she used to work.

a reply to: AlienBorg

I am watching a video saying the text messages were doctored......

a reply to: AlienBorg

YouTube has now demonetized his channel but they haven't banned him completely. Maybe it's on the way but they need to find a really good excuse. The excuse they now found is laughable.

Well unlike you I wasn't sure at first. But I think you called it from the gitgo
if I'm not mistaken. I hung back on this one but now to me it's just all to clear
what we're seeing. A full blow'n trial by media attack on a guy who
admittedly had to turn his life around to find himself and become a decent
person, that just got trashed for doing so.

So now I wonder how surprized he is by all this? No doubt he loved what
he was doing. But how well did he know what he was doing? that's what
I'm waiting to see. What's his next move gonna be? I got my ears on but
so far nothing.

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: AlienBorg

But you do believe he is guilty just like Andy for example. No assumptions at all!!

Andy said 'his victims' which means he thinks he is guilty. And you think he is guilty.

So other than your assumption here, show me the posts where I and others state for a fact he's guilty. All I've said is that the documentary but him in a bad light, nothing more.
Your worse than than the msm you say make false claims!!!!

Assumptions are unopened windows that foolish birds fly into, and their broken bodies are evidence gathered too late."

Andy just said about his victims. So he thinks he is guilty.

Are you trying to deny some members think he is guilty.

Speaking of false claims and online misinformation you better direct your concerns at the media trials online.

Asmo' You do seem to enjoy making assumptions about people here and trying to tell them what to think, yet without any trial or court case here you are telling people you already don't think he's guilty and that there's not enough evidence to prove anything?
Pot calling the kettle black springs to mind!

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AlienBorg

I am watching a video saying the text messages were doctored......

I see...

Women have been approached as it seems from journalists who wanted their accounts. But their accounts were not included in the documentary because they were talking about consenting adults having sex. Extremely convenient for the journalists I can say.

Have you watched the documentary? Most of the time is spent to portray Brand as a womaniser and a bad boy. He was a womaniser btw and was an addict too. But most of what is reported was behaviour from consenting adults and there are s few accounts were serious allegations are made. Apparently the Police will be looking at these ones.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AlienBorg

I am watching a video saying the text messages were doctored......

Well give us a link there pard?

a reply to: Kurokage

Stop calling AlienBorg the wrong name.

originally posted by: Kurokage

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: AlienBorg

But you do believe he is guilty just like Andy for example. No assumptions at all!!

Andy said 'his victims' which means he thinks he is guilty. And you think he is guilty.

So other than your assumption here, show me the posts where I and others state for a fact he's guilty. All I've said is that the documentary but him in a bad light, nothing more.
Your worse than than the msm you say make false claims!!!!

Assumptions are unopened windows that foolish birds fly into, and their broken bodies are evidence gathered too late."

Andy just said about his victims. So he thinks he is guilty.

Are you trying to deny some members think he is guilty.

Speaking of false claims and online misinformation you better direct your concerns at the media trials online.

Asmo' You do seem to enjoy making assumptions about people here and trying to tell them what to think, yet without any trial or court case here you are telling people you already don't think he's guilty and that there's not enough evidence to prove anything?
Pot calling the kettle black springs to mind!

I think you have made up your mind just like Andy and you believe he is guilty. If you see around many of us don't buy the online condemnation and media trials based on a documentary which is based on accounts of incidents that happened 10-15 or 20 years ago.

I am saying, just like everyone else, there doesn't seem to be any evidence other than accounts and a media trial. Any physical evidence (even if existed in the past) has now dissapeared.

Yet without any trial or court with judges and jury he had been found guilty by people like you...

a reply to: Saloon

That umbrella guy.

a reply to: AlienBorg

Seemingly he was sleeping with 5 or 6 different women everyday. 1000’s each year.

So he’s slept with 1000’s of women. Of those 4 have made anonymous claims of misbehaviour without any evidence other than a singular text message which so far hasn’t been proven to exist nor be from Brand.

I’ve slept with maybe 100 women, at least 20 of them are bat sh!t crazy lying bitches.

a reply to: AlienBorg

I think you have made up your mind just like Andy and you believe he is guilty.

Careful lets stay on topic amigo! You think Brand saw this coming?

a reply to: AlienBorg

I have been right about not accepting the online condemnation and the media trials and right about others here who have done this and think he is guilty. And I am not the only one who says no to the online mob and the medial trials. Perhaps you should take a look at this thread.

Asmo'.. I mean Alienborg
All I see in this thread is you accusing others of finding him quilty based purely on your assumptions, and you shouting his innocence in 90% of of your posts.
Whilst the rest of of us are waiting on what the police do next and have tried talking about what was said in the documentary.

a reply to: Kurokage

All I see you doing is trying to trigger AlienBorg......by using the wrong name.

It's uncalled for ...imo.