Russell Brand denies 'serious criminal allegations' he claims are being made against him

originally posted by: Daughter2
a reply to: andy06shake

In your mind, is there any possibility the media could have encouraged these women to lie.
Is it possible after years of investigation, they just happened to find the sociopaths who would lie?

And this isn't off topic - would they lie about vaccines?

Would they lie about anything?

Naaaah.. not really!

a reply to: AlienBorg

Perhaps you should read what I have actually posted?

Borg? Indeed.

Night night, Asmo...I mean , Alienborg?

a reply to: AlienBorg

"What kind of qualified opinions those people have who have decided he is guilty already in the absence of any serious evidence."

Nobody.

Only in your head?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Posters have said things like this on this thread....

Anything to get away form him just being the common run-of-the-mill psychotic rapist.

I think some have decided that he is guilty.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

They have?

Who?

Bad form for posting a quote without a link.

Might get told off?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: AlienBorg

"What kind of qualified opinions those people have who have decided he is guilty already in the absence of any serious evidence."

Nobody.

Only in your head?

Nobody except his agency, his shows and productions......

a reply to: JinMI

And the rest?

Not decided his guilt, just distancing from him.

a reply to: Daughter2

In your mind, is there any possibility the media could have encouraged these women to lie.

Its not impossible.

Is it possible after years of investigation, they just happened to find the sociopaths who would lie?

Which sociopaths?

And this isn't off topic - would they lie about vaccines?

Doom porn alert. LOL

Would they lie about anything?

Thats another rather expansive question?

What do you have in mind?

a reply to: andy06shake

What? First US elections, now vaccines?

Derailing or what?

a reply to: AlienBorg

I don't need a qualified legal opinion to dismiss the online mob and the media trials.

Helps all the same, and you do if you want an actual opinion in a court of law.

Which is where justice is dispensed.

What kind of qualified opinions those people have who have decided he is guilty already in the absence of any serious evidence.

Sounds like broken English to me, and who is that now?

Again people are innocent until proven otherwise in the eyes of the law.

a reply to: AlienBorg

Im your mind maybe.

LoL

In the real world......

a reply to: AlienBorg

Look at that i did that without moving my lips.

And you still managed to get it wrong.

Im away to eat my mussels in black bean sauce and Chicken Chow mein.

Yum'yum.

Have fun.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: JinMI

And the rest?

Not decided his guilt, just distancing from him.

Why would they "distance" themselves from him if they believed he was innocent until proven guilty?


Do you really believe this or just want others to believe it?

Lest we forget…

www.cnn.com...

"Given the severity of the allegations, we are taking this investigation very seriously and treating it as a possible hate crime," the police statement said.

Things aren’t always as they seem.

I’m just going to wait and see.

a reply to: JinMI

Read what I said?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: JinMI

Read what I said?

I did.

Then responded to it.


I know you hate being cornered, but that's not my fault or problem.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Posters have said things like this on this thread....

Anything to get away form him just being the common run-of-the-mill psychotic rapist.

I think some have decided that he is guilty.

Yes that's true.
That's what I said btw
They have already decided he is guilty and they try to divert the attention and the conversation to whether me or you understand the legal process. I suppose they could ask the mob the same question...

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Posters have said things like this on this thread....

Anything to get away form him just being the common run-of-the-mill psychotic rapist.

I think some have decided that he is guilty.

Yes that's true.
That's what I said btw
They have already decided he is guilty and they try to divert the attention and the conversation to whether me or you understand the legal process. I suppose they could ask the mob the same question...

That is pretty gross

originally posted by: Daughter2
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

So you basically said you are a prosecutor with a stellar reputation, right?

I bet I could find 3 or 4 people to get on camera and say horrible things about you. (And this holds to for about 90% of the population).

Even 99% of woman would never make a false claim that leaves 1% who would make a false claim. He literally slept with 1000 women. So that would leave about 10 who would make a false claim. Sure it would take a couple years to contact and trace them all (which it did) but you would still have 10.

Two of them are from America. There are people who believe anything is worth it not to have Trump elected. If this was a true independent documentary why didn't they have the woman who said he was very respectful. The interviewed MANY woman who said just that and they choose to exclude that evidence!

Once you seen a reporter stand in front of a burning building and say it was a peaceful protest - you realize how comfortable the media is with lying.

I hightly doubt claims a decade old claim brought up after someone started to question the MSM. Any reasonable person would - unless of course they are still the small percentage that work as contractors.

The stellar reputation comment is just spot on!

The other comment you made about finding a number of people who can say a few things about you didn't seem to be bothering those who have decided already Russell Brand is guilty.

The independent documentary that was presented in Dispatches that everyone wanted us to watch probably and conveniently forgot to include the accounts of women who were approached by the journalists and told them to get the **** out of here because everything happened between two consenting adults. They chose not to include this information...

But they did include information in the documentary and still most of it tells the story of a very promiscuous man who had sex with consenting adults in most cases. There are of course a few cases where serious allegations have been made. This needs to be said.

I came across the part where one woman who was consenting decided to so no once and she also thought it was wise to say that Brand had dark or black eyes (can't remember exactly) insinuating he was possessed by the devil.

a reply to: JinMI

Just Another LAME Character Assassination Attempt by the Scumbag Liberal Hypocrite NWO Globalists . Their Lies have a Certain Stench to them , The Odor is Well Defined.........