Russell Brand denies 'serious criminal allegations' he claims are being made against him

This is an excert from his book...

“I have always accrued status and validation through my indiscretions (even before I attained the unique accolade of ‘Shagger of the Year’ from The Sun…), but sex is also recreational for me,” he wrote in the first chapter of his first autobiography, 2007’s My Booky Wook. It opened with Brand “incarcerated” in the suburbs of Philadelphia, being treated for sex addiction in the Keystone clinic – “winky-nick”,

Famous/rich people have always used their status for things like sex, we've all heard stories about the casting couch and the depraved parties had by some rich/famous people.
If the parties happen with a bunch of consenting adults who know why and what they're there for, then thats up to them.
But if people in these powerful postions use that to groom and/or abuse people for their deprived addictions and habits, then they should be found out and should be tried.

Has Russell Brand been reported to the police?

The BBC reported that Scotland Yard had received no complaints of criminal behaviour by Brand.1 hour ago

Just reporting on what it presently says online.

originally posted by: Saloon
a reply to: Kurokage

Now the documentary has aired other women are coming forward, just like in the Epstein and weinstein cases, when they feel they aren't alone others do come forward

BTW How much longer do we have to wait before Dispatches finishes up the
big investigation into Epsteins list? What about that evidence? Kind of a bigger
deal than this Bland investigation wouldn't you agree?

You will wait forever!
More time than the age o the Universe!

Why people place so much weight on Dispatches?

a reply to: Itisnowagain

That's nice, nor will you be able to comment on the thread which the documentary is about and expect to be taken seriously given your blatant refusal to watch the relevant information in which the allegations are made against Brand.



As you have already been made aware Police are now involved and asking for witness testimony and the victims to make contact with the appropriate authorities.

This week will dictate any possible ramifications as to there being an investigation, simple as that really.

a reply to: Saloon
a reply to: AlienBorg


I think you'll find Dispatches did make a documentary about Andrew and Epstiens "friendship"..

After Prince Andrew’s gruelling Newsnight interview, Channel 4 is set to repeat the Dispatches that investigates the extraordinary friendship between Prince Andrew and multi-millionaire paedophile Jeffery Epstein. Dispatches features the first UK interview with Mike Fisten, one of the first investigators Virginia Roberts spoke to, Fisten played a key role in exposing Epstein’s crimes while working for an attorney representing some of the victims, he reveals details of his decade long investigation.

a reply to: AlienBorg

Why don't you watch the documentary and find out after all its what the thread is about and where the allegations have been made?

Don't you imagine its at least prudent to do so?

Dispatches don't bite after all.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Itisnowagain

As you have already been made aware Police are now involved and asking for witness testimony and the victims to make contact with the appropriate authorities.

Have Scotland Yard received any complaints of criminal behaviour by Brand?

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: Saloon
a reply to: Kurokage

Now the documentary has aired other women are coming forward, just like in the Epstein and weinstein cases, when they feel they aren't alone others do come forward

BTW How much longer do we have to wait before Dispatches finishes up the
big investigation into Epsteins list? What about that evidence? Kind of a bigger
deal than this Bland investigation wouldn't you agree?

You will wait forever!
More time than the age o the Universe!

Why people place so much weight on Dispatches?

It's top quality investigative journalism with a strong record of uncovering major corruption. Even if this investigation doesn't appeal to you the rest of their back catalogue is essential viewing.

Dispatches doc on how fundamentalist Muslim group infiltrated the Labour Party and wider politics aiming to create an Islamic Caliphate where women should be flogged 100 times if they wear perfume.



Dirty secrets of US food

a reply to: AlienBorg

Why people place so much weight on Dispatches?

It only takes a little investigating to find out what the programme is about..

Dispatches is a British current affairs documentary programme on Channel 4, first broadcast on 30 October 1987. The programme covers issues about British society, politics, health, religion, international current affairs and the environment, and often features a mole inside organisations under journalistic investigation.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

How would i know what information Scotland Yard is privy to pertaining to the allegations or if they have yet received a complaint?

That sort of information would be released as they feel appropriate or see fit and may even be deemed of a sensitive nature down to the allegations involved.

As to the complaints, how would you even know what those are, in their entirety, or the allegations being levied against Brand, when you refuse to watch the Dispatches documentary?

The answer is you don't, and that is simply down to your refusal to assimilate the appropriate information.

a reply to: andy06shake

It's online....a simple search:

"Scotland Yard has received no complaints of criminal behaviour by Brand."

a reply to: Itisnowagain

It's the start of the week we call it Monday.

You may wish to give the Police and the victims time to do their job and gather the facts.

So Google, as opposed to the actual documentary, in which the actual allegations were levied by his alleged victims?

Is that not somewhat third-hand?

What is wrong with the actual source of the reports aka the documentary?

We canny teach pork that refuses to learn or assimilate the relevant information.

Again get back to us when you are in possession of all the relevant facts and information presented in the documentary which the thread references in the first page.

a reply to: Kurokage

I think you'll find Dispatches did make a documentary about Andrew and Epstiens "friendship"..

You just refuse to see the contrast don't you? What dirt did the investigative
documentary find on Andrew? Was it something I just missed some how er?

You don't see dispatches as obviously selective with who they investigate?
Epsteins book/list of names should be an easy slam dunk for fair
journalists. How honorable and rewarding it would be to bring down
so many famous criminal pedophiles? Yet nothing. But the guy that was
able to kick that life and straighten himself out? Woop woop under the
bus pal we got dirt on you.

originally posted by: Saloon
a reply to: Kurokage

I think you'll find Dispatches did make a documentary about Andrew and Epstiens "friendship"..

You just refuse to see the contrast don't you? What dirt did the investigative
documentary find on Andrew? Was it something I just missed some how er?

You don't see dispatches as obviously selective with who they investigate?
Epsteins book/list of names should be an easy slam dunk for fair
journalists. How honorable and rewarding it would be to bring down
so many famous criminal pedophiles? Yet nothing. But the guy that was
able to kick that life and straighten himself out? Woop woop under the
bus pal we got dirt on you.

I must have missed the article that Dispatches has this "book" of Epsteins? Did you watch the episode I wonder?
Dispatches were one of the first to publish/air the dirt about Andrew being a possible pedo and rapist to the masses, what more do you want? It's a channel 4 show not a police agency.

Whose Wheaties did Brand piss in? Sounds like he is being deliberately targeted. What did he do, go Conservative?

a reply to: Kurokage

what more do you want? It's a channel 4 show not a police agency.

Just keep repeating that to yourself now.

a reply to: JIMC5499

He's stated many times that he doesn't vote

originally posted by: Saloon
a reply to: Kurokage

what more do you want? It's a channel 4 show not a police agency.

Just keep repeating that to yourself now.

And just keep backing a possible rapist because 'conspircies'.
Easy to bang up a single line of useless nonesense isn't it?
The episode was called "The Prince and the pedo" if you want to educate yourself about real journalism

originally posted by: bastion

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: Saloon
a reply to: Kurokage

Now the documentary has aired other women are coming forward, just like in the Epstein and weinstein cases, when they feel they aren't alone others do come forward

BTW How much longer do we have to wait before Dispatches finishes up the
big investigation into Epsteins list? What about that evidence? Kind of a bigger
deal than this Bland investigation wouldn't you agree?

You will wait forever!
More time than the age o the Universe!

Why people place so much weight on Dispatches?

It's top quality investigative journalism with a strong record of uncovering major corruption. Even if this investigation doesn't appeal to you the rest of their back catalogue is essential viewing.

Dispatches doc on how fundamentalist Muslim group infiltrated the Labour Party and wider politics aiming to create an Islamic Caliphate where women should be flogged 100 times if they wear perfume.

Dirty secrets of US food

It could be but that doesn't say anything about the case in hand.

I asked earlier why if there is DNA evidence or any other forensic evidence and existed for a very long period then it hasn't bern used to bring this guy to justice and they had to wait 10-17 years to make these allegations?

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: AlienBorg

Why people place so much weight on Dispatches?

It only takes a little investigating to find out what the programme is about..

Dispatches is a British current affairs documentary programme on Channel 4, first broadcast on 30 October 1987. The programme covers issues about British society, politics, health, religion, international current affairs and the environment, and often features a mole inside organisations under journalistic investigation.

Dispatches won't convict Brand and certainly this isn't about a documentary.

I said earlier and will insist that until now

No CCTV evidence of possible assault and abuse

No forensic evidence- This is the most important part of any such investigation

No audio or photographic evidence

The alleged offences were committed many years ago and by definition the collection of any type of evidence is something that seems almost impossible.

Unless there is serious evidence and a court of law with judge and jury deciding then what is presented until now can't do much.