NASA has been in space since the 50s and knows nothing at all about UAPs

a reply to: introufo

and NASA is about space

When "in space" .

originally posted by: Gothmog
a reply to: introufo

and NASA is about space

When "in space" .

Well, not always. Sometimes within space, but not related to space.

1st Link
2nd Link

Webb detects possible signs of life on distant planet

NASA recently announced the discovery of a molecule on the exoplanet K2-18 b that, on Earth, is only produced by life. Located about 120 light-years from Earth in the constellation Leo, K2-18 b lies within the habitable zone to a nearby star.

By using NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope, scientists studied the atmosphere of K2-18 b and noted the possible detection of a molecule called dimethyl sulfide (DMS).

NASA said that, on Earth, DMS is only produced by life with the majority of the DMS in Earth’s atmosphere emitted by phytoplankton in marine environments.

That’s nice……

I’m pretty sure NASA is going to have a tough time communicating with the DMS molecule.

Thank You for spending billions on that Easter Egg hunt.

Can we now concentrate on finding sentient intelligent Alien life within our own solar system?

Sheeeesh…

👽

a reply to: putnam6

Now honestly, does anyone believes in anything NASA says?

originally posted by: putnam6

originally posted by: RedKingBlueQueen

originally posted by: putnam6
NASA says it knows bupkis about UAPs but if they learn anything they will let the public know

I am not going to lie, but between the DoD and NASA weak sauce claims, either, we have mass hallucinations and misidentifications by service men and women, the public, and civil servants or they are both lying their ever-loving asses off and don't deserve the funding they do get.

masa knows what they are because they are made by humans

Pretty much open to all possibilities to varying degrees except the one where NASA is being completely transparent and knows absolutely nothing about this phenomenon, much like the DOD said as well.

As Burchett said and I paraphrase if they are man-made who made them and if it's the US who paid for them to be made, there is not supposed to be military systems development without congressional oversight

theres always off the book projects that get funds in ways we don’t want to know probably but yes there are strange craft in our skies

originally posted by: putnam6

originally posted by: RedKingBlueQueen

originally posted by: putnam6
NASA says it knows bupkis about UAPs but if they learn anything they will let the public know

I am not going to lie, but between the DoD and NASA weak sauce claims, either, we have mass hallucinations and misidentifications by service men and women, the public, and civil servants or they are both lying their ever-loving asses off and don't deserve the funding they do get.

masa knows what they are because they are made by humans

Pretty much open to all possibilities to varying degrees except the one where NASA is being completely transparent and knows absolutely nothing about this phenomenon, much like the DOD said as well.

As Burchett said and I paraphrase if they are man-made who made them and if it's the US who paid for them to be made, there is not supposed to be military systems development without congressional oversight

theres always off the book projects that get funds in ways we don’t want to know probably but yes there are strange craft in our skies

a reply to: Ophiuchus1
He made a complete fool out off James Fox ,I'll bet they had their laughs afterwards

🧛‍♂️🦃🎅🍾

👽

a reply to: putnam6
Just one more thing about NASA that you don't know.
The varginha humanoids were captured on the 20th january 1996. On the same evening a C-17 entered Brazilian aerospace without authorization, it was liberated last minute.
On the 22 a Lear Jet from NASA, entered Brazil as well. Of course, they don't know anything about ET and stuff.

a reply to: putnam6

re Donna Hare, here's some background for calibration.

It turns out this lady Donna Hare, a contractor photo tech, said she was a UFO contactee, and had published a newsletter about people including herself who had met space aliens– maybe the perfect foil for co-workers who might like to tease and tickle her fancy. Every few years she suddenly ‘remembers’ more and more lurid details of alien photographs she saw fifty years ago but had ‘forgotten’ about until her next chance to be on TV. I don’t question her honesty. Just her accuracy. The fatal error in her story demolishes the whole narrative -- she insisted commercial NASA space photos of Earth in the 1970s were sharp enough to see individual trees and shadows [and she used that ‘fact’ to determine the altitude of a disk that was flying low, nearby a tree], but nobody's ever been able to find a single example in the open literature, even though Hare explicitly claimed the photos she saw were being prepared for public sale.

www.jamesoberg.com...

web.archive.org...:/www.jamesoberg.com/hare.donna.tietze.pdf

a reply to: JimOberg

Golly, I didn't mean to shut down this thread!

originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Follow the money right.

Another reason for acting dumb would be the fact that they’d be admitting to lying to us for decades.

As Soloprotocol mentioned in another thread, it’s very telling that they are focusing all resources on current and future sightings. With nothing mentioned about the decades of data we already possess.

Honestly, I expected this to be a complete joke. In actuality, it was a catastrophic failure.

Just like a government branch to have absolutely no touch with their audience.

Nasholes !