NASA has been in space since the 50s and knows nothing at all about UAPs

originally posted by: olaru12
NASA is more about satellite surveillance than ETs. Do you think they aren't part of the MIC? Remember this....

I'll see your Eye in the Sky and raise you with

Now, Another Sad Answer ...

Cheers

originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: putnam6

NASA is just a public front for a much deeper rabbit hole, aka black budget projects.

That's all they have ever been.

NASA?

No Actual Science Applied?

Dig into William Cooper's book, the part about project blue beam.

And then remember who some of the founders were.

Hint, Walt Disney was one.

Why would nasa disclose secret military tech?

What, you think it’s little gray aliens nasa will be disclosing?
a reply to: putnam6

a reply to: introufo

It stands to reason that if anybody knows anything about UFOs

No.
As I used to tell my boss , "not part of my job description

originally posted by: ITSALIVE
Why would nasa disclose secret military tech?

What, you think it’s little gray aliens nasa will be disclosing?
a reply to: putnam6

You can tell posters that read a headline and jump in with their snarky comments. I'm discussing the topic that interests me and keeps me from sticking my head in a spreadsheet for work. If it doesn't interest you or has no merit in your estimation move on

Like I mentioned elsewhere in the thread and the original post, it's NASA our space agency one would have thought they would have had some pictures like the NASA employee asserted in the previous meeting in 2001, about pictures of UAPs high def close-up pics.

No, I didn't expect a video ala CEOTTK but they didn't cover anything, pretty much saying that this isn't in their mission statement if they had more funding then they would be glad to do more.


Did you see any close pics in the meeting or the slick PDF?

so was this person lying at the Congressional hearing WBW?

a reply to: putnam6

Put…Could you provide the active link “Full article: bitly/40wo5AS” ?

☕️🍩

👽

originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: putnam6

They should have been defunded when they ‘lost’ the tech to go to the moon. Or when they ‘accidentally’ erased tons of footage of the moon landings. Talk about worthless tools.

And here we have yet another example, of the head office in a branch of the government, that is 80 freaking years old.

Bill needs to retire. He’s slower than dirt. As I stated in another thread, watching him talk is like watching paint dry.

I agree 100% and yes it's crazy and ridiculous to have persons that old running things, let he be a chairperson or consultant with a fancy office, but running things day to day?

Almost like they need the old guard to be the keeper of secrets.

Jeez, how about some clarification on the "Black Knight satellite" at least?

I always thought it would likely be just like the movie Contact, as soon as something is discovered it gets classified as NATIONAL SECURITY and thus any disclosure or congressional hearings will be designed to downplay what they do or don't know, making any questions otherwise seem ridiculous and half baked. This is the reality, it's the old adage never admit jack chit, even if your wife or girlfriend catches you in bed with another woman. You play completely ignorant and act like nothing is going on.

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
a reply to: putnam6

Put…Could you provide the active link “Full article: bitly/40wo5AS” ?

☕️🍩

👽

Searching for more

this here is the original video for clarification she was a NASA sub-contractor photo specialist, it get chit upon because it was done in with the Steven Greer stuff. But it's like dismissing Graves because he was in the Mexico symposium. As well as a good synopsis from How and Why

It's a classic denial, deflect, and discredit tactic,if I wanted to keep a secret I would establish a few persons to show bogus claims as real and it would smear the whole movement as it is



www.howandwhys.com...

On May 9, 2001, over twenty military, intelligence, government, corporate and scientific witnesses came forward at the National Press Club in Washington, DC to establish the reality of UFOs or extraterrestrial vehicles, extraterrestrial life forms, and the resulting advanced energy and propulsion technologies. As part of the Disclosure Project, Donna Hare, a photographic scientist testified to have worked for NASA contactor Philco Ford in the early 1970s. She had a high-security clearance to walk in NASA’s photo lab and other departments.

During the Disclosure Project press conference, Hare revealed that NASA covered up and eliminated space anomalies such as UFOs from the satellite photos. Hare has got several awards in the space programs. She dedicated most of her time as a technical illustrator to space programs. She created lunar maps and landing slides and had been working for 15 years as a sub-contractor for NASA.

originally posted by: putnam6
NASA says it knows bupkis about UAPs but if they learn anything they will let the public know

I am not going to lie, but between the DoD and NASA weak sauce claims, either, we have mass hallucinations and misidentifications by service men and women, the public, and civil servants or they are both lying their ever-loving asses off and don't deserve the funding they do get.

masa knows what they are because they are made by humans

originally posted by: Gothmog
a reply to: introufo

It stands to reason that if anybody knows anything about UFOs

No.
As I used to tell my boss , "not part of my job description

Well, there’s no job anywhere originally designed to deal with alien UFOs; it's all defense, space, IC, and tech-related, and NASA is about space, and aliens or UFOs are all about space. And anyway, they have to do what they're told. They work for us, and we want some answers.

I doubt NASA will provide them, however.

originally posted by: RedKingBlueQueen

originally posted by: putnam6
NASA says it knows bupkis about UAPs but if they learn anything they will let the public know

I am not going to lie, but between the DoD and NASA weak sauce claims, either, we have mass hallucinations and misidentifications by service men and women, the public, and civil servants or they are both lying their ever-loving asses off and don't deserve the funding they do get.

masa knows what they are because they are made by humans

Pretty much open to all possibilities to varying degrees except the one where NASA is being completely transparent and knows absolutely nothing about this phenomenon, much like the DOD said as well.

As Burchett said and I paraphrase if they are man-made who made them and if it's the US who paid for them to be made, there is not supposed to be military systems development without congressional oversight

a reply to: putnam6

Interesting indeed...

originally posted by: putnam6

originally posted by: ITSALIVE
Why would nasa disclose secret military tech?

What, you think it’s little gray aliens nasa will be disclosing?
a reply to: putnam6

You can tell posters that read a headline and jump in with their snarky comments. I'm discussing the topic that interests me and keeps me from sticking my head in a spreadsheet for work. If it doesn't interest you or has no merit in your estimation move on

Like I mentioned elsewhere in the thread and the original post, it's NASA our space agency one would have thought they would have had some pictures like the NASA employee asserted in the previous meeting in 2001, about pictures of UAPs high def close-up pics.

No, I didn't expect a video ala CEOTTK but they didn't cover anything, pretty much saying that this isn't in their mission statement if they had more funding then they would be glad to do more.


Did you see any close pics in the meeting or the slick PDF?

so was this person lying at the Congressional hearing WBW?

Why are you so very threatened that you are trying to silence me? Asking me to not comment because you don’t like my opinion is not becoming. It seems to embrace all ignorance.

Why do you embrace ignorance?

You’ve not processed my comment clearly you first responded to as you’ve only been seeing red it seems that one might not hold your opinion or discuss how you be deemed fit. No mod removed my post for any transgressions. It’s a shame some posters here think authoring an OP means they control the discussion.

You’ve not answered my question in my post to you, it’s laughable you think I should answer to your questions now.

originally posted by: theatreboy

originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: putnam6

NASA is just a public front for a much deeper rabbit hole, aka black budget projects.

That's all they have ever been.

NASA?

No Actual Science Applied?

Dig into William Cooper's book, the part about project blue beam.

And then remember who some of the founders were.

Hint, Walt Disney was one.

Donna Hare looks like she needs some serious sleep.
What kind of secrets causes that level of "eyebags"?

The kind with lies.

a reply to: Kreeate

originally posted by: ITSALIVE
The kind with lies.

a reply to: Kreeate

Exactly.

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
a reply to: putnam6

Did you say funding?

a re-post….

👽

We give these agencies billions, for such little return.

Over 1 Trillion to the CIA and they cant covertly stop Putin from killing thousands of Ukrainians.... one man!

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
a reply to: putnam6

Did you say funding?

a re-post….

👽

We give these agencies billions, for such little return.

Over 1 Trillion to the CIA and they cant covertly stop Putin from killing thousands of Ukrainians.... one man!

Careful now... this may derail the thread and actually go off-topic...

Mods will delete