Wisconsin School District Offers Books Promoting Gay Porn and Sex Apps

a reply to: Gothmog

I Love the ambiguity of that statement

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: MrPillowpants

Lol that's what sex ed was back then, good thing we've come along way.

I guess all that's left from those times is posting here...

Good thing its just an old retarded generation, too bad they can indoctrinate their kids at will, gotta love freedom...

You know even todays generation has retards in it. If by retarded you
mean young couples F&M. Still having the type of indoctrinated sex that
procreates even. I know because my daughter and her husband have
given me two of the most perfect little girls I could ever have imagined.
Now you may not like hearing it but that's what sex is for. And that's
definitely all they need to know about it. And they will remain perfect.
And never be confused.

a reply to: Saloon

I'm so happy for you!
If you leave them alone and don't indoctrinate them, like you profess you're bound to learn alot about modern day society and their values. The kids today are nice, and compassionate! so much so, that some parents can't keep up...

originally posted by: Turquosie
a reply to: FlyersFan

How old are the kids that can check out these books?

The articles do not say. They just say 'school district libraries'.

If its elementary school, I get parents being a bit upset if their kid can check these books out. However, I don't see the issue if it's high school level kids.

Really? You think it's okay to spend tax payer money on teaching kids to troll the internet for gay sex?

originally posted by: Turquosie
I think it is all a bit silly that parents are worried about gay books referencing sex in libraries but then they give their kids access to the internet which has 1000x more graphic sexual content. Yet, none seem to have an issue giving their kids access to the internet.

It's not just books that 'reference sex'. It's graphic pictures, people pee'n and poop'n on each other, sex toys, sexual fantasy, learning how to troll the internet for gay sex. And we do not know that 'none seem to have an issue giving their kids access to the internet'. We don't know what they allow and don't allow at home.

a reply to: FlyersFan

it says a lot that so many think young children not just have access to hard core porn but routinely engage with hard core porn, it highlights a pornified generation as do the pornified sex stereotypes these kids are led to see themselves shaped as by doctors, the barbie flat cotch, big boobs/massive cl*t, hugely girthed willy as though porn versions of humanity is the norm..

all it says to me is that kids have no idea what a normal human looks or acts like, schools, medical professional and some parents are to blame for giving kids those pornified stereotypes.

no wonder most trans go onto be only fans creators..

originally posted by: Saloon

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: MrPillowpants

Lol that's what sex ed was back then, good thing we've come along way.

I guess all that's left from those times is posting here...

Good thing its just an old retarded generation, too bad they can indoctrinate their kids at will, gotta love freedom...

You know even todays generation has retards in it. If by retarded you
mean young couples F&M. Still having the type of indoctrinated sex that
procreates even. I know because my daughter and her husband have
given me two of the most perfect little girls I could ever have imagined.
Now you may not like hearing it but that's what sex is for. And that's
definitely all they need to know about it. And they will remain perfect.
And never be confused.

its a pornified version of humanity that thinks humans go straight past the odd fumble to BDSM and/or asphyxiation sex play it looks far more misogynistic than the Victorians or Puritans..

its a world in which love can be bypassed by porn it can bypass women which hints at ts deeply dark anti women roots.

a reply to: Terpene

I'm sure you'd also agree that prople who have children by procreative sex
should never be lectured by anyone in regards to raising their own
kids. Let alone by a mostly pro abortionist c ommunity who's sex life will
never be procreative and never produce children of their own.

And kids don't need porn in their school libraries at any age.
Because parents don't send their kids to school to get addicted
to porn. And that's not what they need to succeed in the world.

a reply to: Saloon

This poster (and a couple of others) has demonstrated that they will rail against anything that limits sexual indoctrination of children and defend anything that does manage to help indoctrinate them into early sexualization (like porn in libraries apparently) Anything that could possibly be leveraged to "turn" another one is their agenda and any talk of limiting the predatory grooming threatens their cause.

those of you who think there should be pornography in elementary and junior high library's, is there any limits on what a child should encounter? Or do you feel that limiting the phonography to adults is wrong at every level?

It seems you who argue against this either have no clue what's in these books, or really aren't mentally fit to engage in this discussion. If that's incorrect, then the only option is that you think there should be no restrictions on what should be in a child's library as school. Would indoctrination into white supremacy groups, websites, and instructions on how to join and hate "the jews" also be acceptable, or is that wrong and just anal sex instructions and pictures where your line is?

a reply to: Halfswede

groomers gotta groom.

a reply to: Terpene

I see you're trying very hard to defend the actions of the school and peddle the usual LGBTQ+ rhetoric and propaganda. Fortunately nobody else has defended the school in this thread or argues it's ok if kids are exposed to sexually explicit material, whatever this might be.

But in the LGBTQ+ scene this is nothing new. Kids are sexualised from a very young age and that's the aim pretty much.

a reply to: Terpene

Imagine the surprise if sexual violence were to be lower where sex ed was more holistic. The following are not examples from western society but some very retarded places where the correlation between sex ed and sexual violence was so strikingly obvious, it became undeniable.

I don’t know about violence but we can all see with our own two eyes that teen pregnancy is nowhere even close to where it was just 20/30 years ago.
Something’s working.

originally posted by: JAGStorm
.... we can all see with our own two eyes that teen pregnancy is nowhere even close to where it was just 20/30 years ago.
Something’s working.

Well it's NOT teaching kids how to troll the internet for gay porn, or teaching them to pee on each other for sexual gratification like are in the materials in Wisconsin. That's not 'sex ed'. Those are things that some adults do for entertainment.

PEW RESEARCH - Why the Teen Birth Rate is Falling

What else may be contributing to the decline in teen birth rates? Less sex, use of more effective contraception and more information about pregnancy prevention.

For one thing, there has been a significant decline in the percentage of never-married girls and women ages 15 to 19 who report that they have ever had sex, from 51% in 1988 to 42% in 2011-15, according to National Survey of Family Growth data. Among those teens who have had sex, the majority (81% of females and 84% of males) used a contraceptive method the first time they had sex. This figure has not changed significantly for males, but it has increased for females since 2002, when 74.5% used contraception.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: Turquosie
a reply to: FlyersFan

How old are the kids that can check out these books?

The articles do not say. They just say 'school district libraries'.

If its elementary school, I get parents being a bit upset if their kid can check these books out. However, I don't see the issue if it's high school level kids.

Really? You think it's okay to spend tax payer money on teaching kids to troll the internet for gay sex?

It's a wierd choice if some librarian decided to incorporate that into a high school library. Sure.. but it's nothing shocking to high school kids..

a reply to: Waterglass

i mean, half the time we are buried under snow and ice, so maybe there's reasons

im glad I left the state, but unfortunately, my Spanish boyfriend hasn't figured out if im a psychokiller or a dogman yet.

a reply to MrPillowpants

Referring to westboro baptist

You also miss seeing them protest a soldier's funeral and screaming horrible things at their parents. Also, how much they pray for the death of more American soldiers (straight soldiers, all soldiers)? They had(may still have, but I don't care for them) two websites, godhatesfags and godhatesamerica. If you are throwing in with that group, then you've lost any credibility.

I went to an independent Bible believing baptist church, they were very very strict and even my pastor found them revolting.

Check out the Wikipedia page on them and another famous quote of theirs "Thank God for dead soldiers". They are vile.

I think the age factor matters a lot here, in Florida it was pretty clear they made this available for young kids.

But when youre at the right age to learn about birds and bees there should be room to learn how homosexuals (gay/lesbian) mate. Doesnt mean it should teach kinks/toys but just what forplay is, safe sex, the act and possible consequences.

originally posted by: ElitePlebeian
I think the age factor matters a lot here, in Florida it was pretty clear they made this available for young kids.

But when youre at the right age to learn about birds and bees there should be room to learn how homosexuals (gay/lesbian) mate. Doesnt mean it should teach kinks/toys but just what forplay is, safe sex, the act and possible consequences.

Why do you even need to learn about how homosexuals mate? It amounts to scissoring and butt sex, strictly unnatural pleasure. Sure you can teach your child not to judge and some of the realities of our modern world, but .... why grotesque details involving detailed sexual acts? Why do children need to be taught on how to perform sexual acts like that? You really think teaching a 7 year old about anal is actually productive? Wtf has this world come to? Do you seriously think this is appropriate for children?