Scientists grow whole model of human embryo, without sperm or egg

manufactured spare parts for the rich

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: AlienBorg

And just like that, the only valid argument the trans critique had, pooof gone...

Your interpretation of this type of research is as valid as your beliefs in the trans ideology.

a reply to: Terpene

You need XX and XY for reproduction. No human has ever been born otherwise.

Unless you think this cases is one where human reproduction has been achieved without sperm and egg.

It's amazing to what lengths trans activists go to support their debunked ideology.

a reply to: PorkChop96

It's still possible, it's ethically questionable but it's possible.

Of course nothing will come of it without a functioning uterus...

a reply to: djz3ro

Will it Have a SOUL ? .......Hmm......

a reply to: Terpene

We don't even know if it's possible

They are models not the real thing. There is no evidence to prove they will work when placed into a functioning uterus.

So, as of right now, your statement is incorrect.

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: DBCowboy

Sooo?

You still don't need a union between a haploid shooting and haploid breeding person to create life.

Basically xx doing it with xy is not a fundamental requirement for human survival anymore....

Carry on

Ummm,

. . . . your post was so filled with willful ignorance I just got a nosebleed reading it.

Please, read a book before debating science.

originally posted by: nickyw
a reply to: DBCowboy

of course but if the rich continue to embrace civil genocide of the billions of humans on the planet they'll naturally want to replace those human with a servant class and live as gods over them..

no one else will drink their mush, goo, poo water and insects..

Just genetically modify humans that require a specific amino acid to live, instant slave class!

a reply to: PorkChop96

What do you think model means?

They used real human cells!
They formed a textbook human embryo. Model is just a legal term to distinguish between real embryo research, as that is mire strictly regulated....

would be interesting to know if the chromosomes of the cells need to be of opposite gender for it to work...

Imagine the shock if not...

The cells will not mature into a human being, that is a fact, but hey they could be manipulated like other member said to make spare parts for the rich.

But then again how will the human body be able to accept something that is none but somewhat human, funny, I wonder what the blood type on is the somewhat embryo.

Oh Brave New World!

a reply to: DBCowboy

The science in the OP is the topic....

Not your dusty bookshelf of antics...

a reply to: Terpene

Model means model, not real thing. Is a model rocket a real rocket?

They aren't full human cells

"Embryo Models: derived from pluripotent stem cells that replicate some developmental processes that occur in early human embryos"

Notice the "replicate some"

You said it yourself "distinguish between real embryo research" that would mean that these are not real embryos.

a reply to: AlienBorg

Unless you think this cases is one where human reproduction has been achieved without sperm and egg.

It's literally what it says in the OP. I really wonder how its possible to lie so blatantly.

without using sperm, eggs or a womb.

One step closer to turning humanity into little identical hairless mongoloid looking entities that will have to have their intelligence boosted by an emotionless, spiritless A.I.

Do you want greys? Because this is exactly how you get greys Lana.

a reply to: Terpene

It's not reproduction, it's cloning.

(I feel like I'm playing chess with a pigeon!)

a reply to: DBCowboy

Careful, that pigeon might be offended by that comparison

a reply to: PorkChop96

now that this has failed we go back to semantics? Help yourself...

It's a fully developed 14 day old textbook embryo model.

The way it sounds a pediatrician wouldn't know the diffrence, this is as real as it gets for embryo research, without abortions.

unlike a model rocket this has all the requirements to reach the moon, so your comparison is wrong.

a reply to: DBCowboy

You mean like asexual reproduction?

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: DBCowboy

You mean like asexual reproduction?

No.

*shakes head and walks away*