David Grusch: A Modern Hero Defying the System, Unmasking the Truth

In my personal view, we owe a great deal of appreciation to David Grusch. It's hard to fathom the immense bravery he displayed by undertaking actions unprecedented for someone in his position.

Just a day before his testimony before Congress, it appeared to me that Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, the current head of AARO, might become his most formidable adversary. In my perspective, anyone even slightly connected to these programs should be regarded as a lifelong intelligence officer - completely subservient to the ethos of the senior intelligence authorities. Generally, individuals in such roles would never risk their future, careers, or their own and their families' safety to disclose this kind of information to the public.

But David Grusch proves to be an exception to this rule. He seems resistant to their influence. Ordinarily, one would expect him to succumb to the pressure, but Grusch's intelligence is palpable and he's likely too astute to be manipulated.

Grusch's actions have put Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick in an extremely precarious situation. Kirkpatrick is now perceived as a representative for those who wish to suppress the truth. Grusch has indirectly, but noticeably, implied this. I was pondering this very thought the day prior to the hearing and, as anticipated, Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick has already retaliated. If you're interested, click the link below to view Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick's attempt to undermine the substance of what Mr. Grusch brought before Congress.

Therefore, we should brace ourselves for a clash, a clash that I believe will ultimately favor David Grusch. My optimism stems from Grusch's superior intellect. I can't help but think Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick is engaged in a simpler game, like checkers, while David Grusch is already five steps ahead in a complex game of chess.

David Grusch is a man of strategy. He assessed the risks, considered all possible scenarios, and prepared himself well in advance to counter any offensive moves.

It's essential to recognize that David Grusch's actions require a level of courage that many of us lack. In any way possible, we must show our support for Mr. Grusch. Even if our support is only moral and expressed through internet postings, it counts. The media have apparently sought to downplay what could potentially be the biggest scandal and story of our time, or even in history. This could not have been possible without David Grusch. He has reinvigorated the community that is demanding the release of this concealed information, thereby inspiring others to muster the courage to reveal more.

I've always speculated that these phenomena might be angels, or fallen angels, and the recently leaked information endorsing his statements about interdimensional beings or bioengineered entities, possibly physical vessels for such beings, is fascinating and invites us to explore myriad possibilities.

RETALIATION ATTEMPT BY DR. KIRKPATRICK TO TURN THE NARRATIVE

Peace!

PsyOp

a reply to: FingerMan

Good stuff…especially the article….Kirkpatrick is a sham……now I see there’s bad blood there against Grusch

The BIG Show…is getting good 🍿🍺

👽

a reply to: FingerMan

I dont know what Grusch's angle is, but I don't believe him.

I think Grusch believes Grusch however, so he didn't lie under oath.

If he was telling us factual truth, it would violate his clearance. But as long as he isn't revealing classified info, he can say what he believes.

If he believes what he is claiming, I believe he is delusional.

originally posted by: boozo
PsyOp

Absolutely it WAS! But I do believe David Grusch has foiled their PsyOp, and threatens their plans.

As this has gone outside intelligence channels controlled by the unknowable group of individuals who have been controlling the narrative. Now it is out of their hands. Dr. Kirkpatrick will be the fall guy, publicly.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: FingerMan

I dont know what Grusch's angle is, but I don't believe him.

I think Grusch believes Grusch however, so he didn't lie under oath.

If he was telling us factual truth, it would violate his clearance. But as long as he isn't revealing classified info, he can say what he believes.

If he believes what he is claiming, I believe he is delusional.

No offense, but your post is illogical if you listened to the entirety of his testimony.
His position in the intelligence community gave him access to 'some' of the data which he followed up on his own accord.
He has divulged information that has been cleared by 'forget the office name' preventing him from divulging information harmful to national security. As far as that office is concerned, the data he is divulging is completely made up, non-existent. Hence it can ONLY be backed up by being provided to investigators who will follow up before offices/titles/locations can be erased/moved/changed.

This is all very plain and logical/believable to me. And I find Mr. Grusch to be compellingly believable. I don't think he is capable of telling a lie.

a reply to: FingerMan

As I’ve predicted….of possibly happening to the future of AARO


👽

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
a reply to: FingerMan

As I’ve predicted….of possibly happening to the future of AARO

👽

LOL!

Yes, AARO is just a new name for an old idea.... Project Blue Book, AATIP

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: FingerMan

I dont know what Grusch's angle is, but I don't believe him.

I think Grusch believes Grusch however, so he didn't lie under oath.

If he was telling us factual truth, it would violate his clearance. But as long as he isn't revealing classified info, he can say what he believes.

If he believes what he is claiming, I believe he is delusional.

As someone with a TS/SBI/SCI clearance and a few NDA's that will expire in 2085, he absolutely did not violate the terms of his clearance because he was testifying to Congress.

He is, however, skirting SCI information because that cannot be a part of public record.

EVER.

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: FingerMan

I dont know what Grusch's angle is, but I don't believe him.

I think Grusch believes Grusch however, so he didn't lie under oath.

If he was telling us factual truth, it would violate his clearance. But as long as he isn't revealing classified info, he can say what he believes.

If he believes what he is claiming, I believe he is delusional.

As someone with a TS/SBI/SCI clearance and a few NDA's that will expire in 2085, he absolutely did not violate the terms of his clearance because he was testifying to Congress.

He is, however, skirting SCI information because that cannot be a part of public record.

EVER.

To help with understanding his post, in layman terms:

SCI stands for Sensitive Compartmented Information and SAP stands for Special Access Program. Security clearance levels come with different investigations and different challenges. As the name says some information is segregated into compartments and can only be accessed by people who are “read on” to the program.

a reply to: Lumenari

It can become part of public record, if leaked. And if that were to happen, we'd never know it was previously.
There are all kinds of examples of this. The easiest example of this off top of my head is the SR71 Blackbird.

originally posted by: FingerMan

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: FingerMan

I dont know what Grusch's angle is, but I don't believe him.

I think Grusch believes Grusch however, so he didn't lie under oath.

If he was telling us factual truth, it would violate his clearance. But as long as he isn't revealing classified info, he can say what he believes.

If he believes what he is claiming, I believe he is delusional.

As someone with a TS/SBI/SCI clearance and a few NDA's that will expire in 2085, he absolutely did not violate the terms of his clearance because he was testifying to Congress.

He is, however, skirting SCI information because that cannot be a part of public record.

EVER.

To help with understanding his post, in layman terms:

SCI stands for Sensitive Compartmented Information and SAP stands for Special Access Program. Security clearance levels come with different investigations and different challenges. As the name says some information is segregated into compartments and can only be accessed by people who are “read on” to the program.

What I (she) am telling you is that there was no SAP in the 80's and SCI stood for Secure Compartmentalized Information when I was there.

There were also 2 that I know of secure restrictions above that... one of which ironically was named "Q" because I think of the Bond films.

That didn't age too well, obviously.

But thank you for explaining for me.

originally posted by: FingerMan
a reply to: Lumenari

It can become part of public record, if leaked. And if that were to happen, we'd never know it was previously.
There are all kinds of examples of this. The easiest example of this off top of my head is the SR71 Blackbird.

If you say so...

a reply to: Lumenari

I was just helping others understand the acronyms you posted. That was not directed at you, or for you.
And while those classifications may not have existed previous to a certain year, my example is still valid. You could throw the U2 spy plane in there too.
There is no knowledge or secret that can be maintained indefinitely. I'm sure there is a law of entropy with secrets somewhere in the intelligence world dictionary where they determine it is better to control and manipulated disclosure narrative than try to control an unplanned release.
That is where some may believe this is a psyop, but I don't believe that with Mr. Grusch.

a reply to: FingerMan

I might be wrong, but is Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick not the guy who said something about a mothership?

I am seeing the same story where Dr. Kirkpatrick is taking aim at Grusch, posted on many news outlets. But didn't Grusch have far wider and higher clearance than this Kirkpatrick guy?

If Grusch is total bs, why don't they clear to release evidence of just one claim he is making? and then let the congress follow it to prove he is bs, and send him to prison?

So I'm thinking he is legit, and a hero, or he is a part of the overall disinfo campaign.

If Grusch is a puppet, why do it this way, unless they want the public to remain confused. it makes no sense to me. I can see why they might want us to think they are real nhi craft (when they are not), and I can see why they would want us to think there is nothing at all (when there is actual nhi) But why keep us in limbo? If it's to keep us distracted, it's not a very good technique, because not many people seem interested.

I think you are right, he is a hero, or they would have proved he was wrong already. being blocked from a Skif makes them look guilty, and further erodes public trust, and further loss of trust is not helpful no matter what the agenda.

a reply to: kangawoo

Bingo!

In response to the reporter asking David Grusch, in his famous interview, why Dr. Kirkpatrick gave testimony to congress that there was no tangible evidence of NHI, or other worldly NHI craft in possession of the US, or anything like that.
Grusch did say that he briefed Dr. Kirkpatrick on all of the data, and that Dr. Kirkpatrick had the access to follow up his conclusions.

Their differing testimony put eachother at odds. Grusch knows this. This directly attacks the credibility of Dr. Kirkpatrick. And while you could call him a fall guy for the suits, I believe Grusch when he said that Dr. Kirkpatrick had the access and data to come to the same conclusion.

Dr. Kirkpatrick must now do one of two things: Admit he committed perjury; attack David Grusch credibility.
It was obvious to me as I watched the interview this would be the case.
And that is why I believe Grusch has this planned out. He expects the intelligence world to come down on top of his head and assassinate his character. I'm sure the evidence he has provided, and other plans, gave him the solace to move forward. Or, maybe the threats to his person and family dominated his motivation.

a reply to: FingerMan

The truth wil prevail ... one day ...
David Grusch is not the first and will not be the last.
But I think he's right
Written in 2010 (I'm ready to start updating the English version because there is new stuff in my mind (and I doubt if any link on my amateuristic website is still working ...)
www.evawaseerst.be...

Well, in the hero's journey--as well as Hegelian Dialect--there must be an antagonist. The "embodiment" of narrative opposition to direct any hate and frustration at as needed for the final resolution.

Look, I hope I'm wrong and this isn't a psyop, however the very things you know and impressively stated about the IC you turned around and gave a Grusch a pass on.

Are you familiar with SERPO, Finger?

I hope this is the beginning of real disclosure. It is past time. I also think they are on a time limit and it will be taken out of their hands. Maybe.

However something about all of this just doesn’t sit right. It’s all a bit too easy and rehearsed. It’s all coming at a very chaotic time in the world. Maybe that is why, but feels to me like cover for something. Something big.

I’d love to see proof shown to the world that cannot be denied by anyone. I believe from what I have seen and read anyway. I think it’s more complex than we imagine. But I just am not buying Grusch and his attempts to introduce the Non Human Intelligence designation. That is for a purpose we don’t yet understand.

a reply to: CoyoteAngels
The sworn in part was strange and what I've seen incomplete,or I missed something that day?