Charges added to Trump indictment for having govt records at MAL, a 3rd defendent charged

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: CoyoteAngels

Trump is accused in a new superseding indictment with his valet, Walt Nauta, of an attempt to delete video surveillance footage at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida during the summer of 2022.

Uh, scuze me...but I was told no reasonable prosecutor would try these types of crimes/cases.......

Trump is accused in a new superseding indictment with his valet, Walt Nauta, of an attempt to delete video surveillance footage at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida during the summer of 2022.

thats a copy of what hillary actually did with ordering emails deleted after subpoenas

this is a mock charge for get even attitude face slap lol

a reply to: frogs453

since when they grant immunity for crimes not committed? lol

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: JinMI

Mills instructed Platte River Communications to set a 60 day retention policy on Hillary's emails in December 2014. Three months before the subpoena.

On March 9th, 2015, a few days after the subpoena was received, she then reached back out to Platte River and told them to preserve any emails still on the server.

If Nauta and De Oliveira were willing to cooperate with investigators they would get immunity. They chose to be loyal to Trump and are more facing 65+ years of jail.

no proof

thats a fake story

those companies said the deletes were real

but they didnt know fbi already had the recovered emails that were deleted lol

originally posted by: WingDingLuey

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: CoyoteAngels

Trump is accused in a new superseding indictment with his valet, Walt Nauta, of an attempt to delete video surveillance footage at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida during the summer of 2022.

Uh, scuze me...but I was told no reasonable prosecutor would try these types of crimes/cases.......

Trump is accused in a new superseding indictment with his valet, Walt Nauta, of an attempt to delete video surveillance footage at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida during the summer of 2022.

thats a copy of what hillary actually did with ordering emails deleted after subpoenas

this is a mock charge for get even attitude face slap lol

I think its a very apt way of showing the obvious double standard.

If you are building your entire relocation campaign on the political persecution of your main opponent you have little choice but to keep piling on in order to keep it fresh in the minds of those you are selling the propaganda.

Just imagine how much better the country would be if the Democrats turned their energy toward furthering their stated causes instead of amassing power through unethical political maneuvering.

originally posted by: dandandat2
If you are building your entire relocation campaign on the political persecution of your main opponent you have little choice but to keep piling on in order to keep it fresh in the minds of those you are selling the propaganda.

Just imagine how much better the country would be if the Democrats turned their energy toward furthering their stated causes instead of amassing power through unethical political maneuvering.

I understand what you are saying, start doing work for this country and stop the BS vendettas against Trump.

The fact is, Trump is keeping them busy at the expense of furthering their deranged Liberal agenda that squeezes the ballz of real American citizens.

It’s my opinion that Trump will never be convicted of any of this bullsh!t, let it drag on until the election.

a reply to: frogs453

What did the Biden family sell for the millions in income? What product or service?

a reply to: JinMI

They left out the (D) requirement when they told you that.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: JinMI

They left out the (D) requirement when they told you that.

You're right, I'm sorry.

I forgot that justice has qualifiers.

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

So many seem to think that some criminal charge for one 'side' somehow exonerates the other 'side' from their criminality.

Two bad people, who both do bad things, are still two bad people who both have done bad things.

a reply to: chr0naut

But only one is under indictment, but both are running for the most powerful seat on the planet.

What a country!

a reply to: chr0naut

So many seem to think that some criminal charge for one 'side' somehow exonerates the other 'side' from their criminality.

One charge? I think there is 47 or more at this point. Nice try though.

Two bad people, who both do bad things, are still two bad people who both have done bad things.

Perhaps you can clarify this question for us.

Who since and who before has been held to the same legal standard as Trump?
Who since and who before has been held to the same public standard as Trump?
Who since and who before has been investigated as much as Trump?

Thanks in advance.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: CoyoteAngels

Any thoughts on the fact that a Trump employee has testified they were approached by De Oliveira and told them that the "boss" had requested that he destroy the surveillance camera footage just days after Trump had received a subpoena for that footage?

That's not the kind of work you delegate. You do it yourself. With a hammer.
Ask Hillary.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: chr0naut

So many seem to think that some criminal charge for one 'side' somehow exonerates the other 'side' from their criminality.

One charge? I think there is 47 or more at this point. Nice try though.

Two bad people, who both do bad things, are still two bad people who both have done bad things.

Perhaps you can clarify this question for us.

Who since and who before has been held to the same legal standard as Trump?
Who since and who before has been held to the same public standard as Trump?
Who since and who before has been investigated as much as Trump?

Thanks in advance.

You’ll get crickets.
Just like I get crickets to the 2 questions I have been asking these guys.

You see how fast they vacate a thread when I bring them up.
They have no answers, it’s all just hurt feelz.

a reply to: WingDingLuey

I'm sure you have proof to support the claim that Hillary ordered emails be deleted after the subpoena was received. If so, you might want to turn it over to the FBI since they found none.

a reply to: WingDingLuey

There's texts and emails that support that "fake story."

a reply to: underpass61

It's becoming clearer and clearer that none of you are actually familiar with the Hillary case and instead are just repeating lies told by Trump.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: Threadbare

My thoughts are that this is political. This is intended to influence the election. And this is to deflect from Biden family crimes.

Your assessment is correct.
This is the only way the dnc can stop him.

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

Does anyone think this is coincidental?

Absolutely not , adding charges because the great Umpa Lumpa showed classified documents to people who didn't have security clearance and tried to delete security footage evidence is clearly an attempt to cover an unrelated thing up , nothing the great one does should ever be questioned ... Ever !

Not sure how the thread turned into whatabout Hillary. So, how do you feel about the fact that the courts have testimony from Trump's own attorneys that he asked them about destroying the documents, and also "plucking out" the "bad ones" to not return? How do you feel about the text messages from Nauta regarding moving the documents out of MAL so they would not be turned over as required? How do you feel about them wrangling the maintenance guy into the scheme to destroy the surveillance video rather than turn it over again with a subpoena? How do you feel about the other testimony that Trump purposely was withholding the documents from the subpoena and had his lawyer sign the false attestation that they were returned?

Do you think everyone is lying? Do you think they were some "deep state plant"?