It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
One mastermind of the ’60s revolution was Bill Ayers, who was first a progressive educator, then a bomb-throwing revolutionary in the Weather Underground, and then a fugitive from justice. It was while he was hiding from the FBI for the entire decade of the 1970s that Ayers realized that violent revolution could not topple the government unless it was first rotted from within. In “Prairie Fire” and other radical writings, Ayers described how young people, minorities and women could be turned against the system, and most importantly how revolutionaries who wore suits and ties could infiltrate boardrooms, political parties, the military, the courts and other institutions of society in order to bring about change from within.
....
Under such a scenario, the Constitution becomes a tool for social engineering rather than a protection against government excess, as was originally intended.
It too is all part of the plan. After all, judges are lawyers, and lawyers are graduated from law schools, and the top law-school students come from the top Ivy League and radical-left colleges, and most radical college students come from public schools, and public schools are to progressivism what politics is to the swamp. You can thank John Dewey, and you can thank Bill Ayers, who after he returned to public view, became an influential educator of educators at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
In “Prairie Fire,” Ayers outlined how the revolution would transform America. Yes, violence would play a role. Yes, bankrupting the system by increasing dependence on government would play a role. Yes, spurring foreign wars to spread America’s military too thin would play a role. Yes, encouraging division among the races would be part of it, as would weakening the influence of religion on the masses, but if you wanted to win the revolution, Ayers made it perfectly clear how to begin: “The real question is: Who will control the schools?”
How did we get here? The answer by now should be obvious.
Fun fact though, communists are specifically NOT protected by the civil rights act.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: watchitburn
Fun fact though, communists are specifically NOT protected by the civil rights act.
If they aren’t, they should be, along with Nazis and anyone else who most of us find distasteful at best.
If we as a society can’t squash bad ideas, that’s on us. That’s the thing about free societies without censorship.
If we’re a nation or society of conviction and freedom, we shouldn’t feel attacked or belittled by ideas that are easy to argue.
instead of controlling populations by punishing dissent, it is possible to induce their cooperation though means of positive reinforcement: Now that we know how positive reinforcement works, and why negative doesn’t, we can be more deliberate and hence more successful, in our cultural design. We can achieve a sort of control under which the controlled… nevertheless feel free. They are doing what they want to do, not what they are forced to do. That’s the source of the tremendous power of positive reinforcement—there’s no restraint and no revolt. By a careful design, we control not the final behavior, but the inclination to behave—the motives, the desires, the wishes. The curious thing is that in that case the question of freedom never arises.
originally posted by: SourGrapes
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: watchitburn
Fun fact though, communists are specifically NOT protected by the civil rights act.
If they aren’t, they should be, along with Nazis and anyone else who most of us find distasteful at best.
If we as a society can’t squash bad ideas, that’s on us. That’s the thing about free societies without censorship.
If we’re a nation or society of conviction and freedom, we shouldn’t feel attacked or belittled by ideas that are easy to argue.
As long as they abide by the laws of the Constitution, which ironically protects us from Communist restrictions
originally posted by: AlexandrosTheGreat
I honestly believe that the US is a predominantly conservative nation. For the last election, they had to cheat and make it seem like the liberals took the White House. They did so again during the 2022 elections when we know dang well they had a red wave but people like Kari Lake had the election stolen with the unbiased third party observer testifying in court that the election was an obvious sham.
Well, they cannot get away with staging the elections again not can they hack the vote, break chain of custody, or any of those other tactics that cannot be used again. So what will they do this time? Well, we have totally unchecked open borders and those crossing are not being documented while laws are being passed left and right to ensure illegals are given the vote. This go round, they may be able to win simply because these last years have seen at the very LEAST 25 milllion and maybe even 40 million plus coming across and I am sure they are being surgically installed where needed and promised all applicable perks, food stamps, and welfare payouts if they simply make sure to vote Democrat. And the fact the population of the US has increased by as much as an eight of third world, unskilled, barbaric, ungrateful hotel wrecking, looting, raping, murdering, gang affiliated filth in many circumstances, it’s enough for them to hold onto power for at least another four years while they figure out how to do it again next go round.
Andersen describes the overall arc of the book:
America was created by true believers and passionate dreamers, by hucksters and their suckers—which over the course of four centuries has made us susceptible to fantasy...In other words: mix epic individualism with extreme religion; mix show business with everything else; let all that steep and simmer for a few centuries; run it through the anything-goes 1960s and the Internet age; the result is the America we inhabit today, where reality and fantasy are weirdly and dangerously blurred and commingled.
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: CriticalStinker
Because that's working out great so far huh....