Special Counsel's J6 Case

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
a reply to: Saloon

You must have another definition of 'unscathed' than the rest of us use. Trump's being prosecuted for multiple felonies. And there are more indictments coming at him. That's not 'unscathed'. That's the sound of multiple chickens coming home to roost. He's finally running out of legal road - and legal help.

No no the idiots you support are the ones willing to change definitions of words
only when it suits them. Surely you're aware of that? Also if Trump walks away
from this ridiculous pile of make believe like always?

Fear not I'm sure they're willing to resort to a final solution.

I know you can live with that just fine because DTS.

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: nugget1

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: nugget1

He was requesting signature verification in Georgia as well, which is obvious in context with the entire conversation.

Find me the votes, means find the bad votes. You can stop as soon as you find enough to tie + 1. That means that there were enough bad votes to change the outcome.

The opposing team has always just assumed he meant 'manufacture new votes'. He clearly meant "find the cheat".

The 'opposing team' knew exactly what he meant and the only way to get away with their scam was to change the narrative and convince people he meant something else.

They had plenty of practice of how to go about it, starting with the Russian Collusion and continuing on to this day.

Graham and Pence should be barred from ever holding any gov. job again, along with a host of other.

Lindsey Graham? The Spineless One? The man who I can only presume Trump has Compromat on? What's he done, other than grovel before Trump recently and beg to have his tummy petted? And as for Pence - let me guess, you're mad at him for growing a pair and telling Trump that he couldn't stop the certification of the election on January 6?

If Pence had a 'pair' he never would have called for a congressanal investigation into voter irregularities.
If Graham hadn't led the charge with China Mitch to block Trump's every move he could have gotten a lot more done.

Our country was in shambles when Trump took office and despite all the career politicians doing everything they could to make his term a disaster we prospered for four years. The career politicians are back in charge and we're worse off than ever.

As a person, I don't find Trump to be very pleasant, but as a POTUS he did more for the common man than any that came before him. He's got something career politicians don't; it's called 'patriotism'.

originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: nugget1

Graham and Pence should be barred from ever holding any gov. job again, along with a host of other.

I'm looking forward to a 3 way race.

I'm not; I believe that would be a shoe-in for the Democrats and four more years to 'Finish the Job'.

originally posted by: nugget1

originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: nugget1

Graham and Pence should be barred from ever holding any gov. job again, along with a host of other.

I'm looking forward to a 3 way race.

I'm not; I believe that would be a shoe-in for the Democrats and four more years to 'Finish the Job'.

My focus on the election boils down to one thing. Don't even mention lowering my SS or Medicare. It's the principal of the thing....I'm still paying into both. Pissing off the seniors is a quick path to political suicide.

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: nugget1

originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: nugget1

Graham and Pence should be barred from ever holding any gov. job again, along with a host of other.

I'm looking forward to a 3 way race.

I'm not; I believe that would be a shoe-in for the Democrats and four more years to 'Finish the Job'.

My focus on the election boils down to one thing. Don't even mention lowering my SS or Medicare. It's the principal of the thing....I'm still paying into both. Pissing off the seniors is a quick path to political suicide.

You don't really believe the Democrats will protect SS do you?

Here's how it will play out when TPTB decide it's time to pull the plug on social security:

The Republicans will be 'allowed' to regain majority power in all three houses and introduce a bill to end/replace SS with a UBI. OR ending SS will be hidden in another bill the MUST be passed.

I expect it to be done in deceptive little steps-perhaps several bills passed in quick succession that have the silver bullet hidden within them.

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
a reply to: nugget1

Christopher Krebs, the director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency - appointed by Trump - said that the election was fair and there were no widespread irregularities of the kind that Trump was ranting wildly about.
Trump fired him.

Trumps admin appointed him not trump personally. and we all know there were moles in trumps admin.

The people in this thread defending Trump... do you really, truly, after years and years of tens of thousands of documented lies and dozens of failed lawsuits really still believe a single word this man says?

Can you really be that gullible? Or do you know he's a liar and he's just making stuff up left and right, but you just choose to go along with the lies?

Which one is it? I have a very hard time believing people can be so naive for so many years.

Trump is a con man. He is a poor man's idea of a rich man, a weak man's idea of a strong man and a stupid man's idea of a smart man.

originally posted by: nugget1

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: nugget1

originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: nugget1

Graham and Pence should be barred from ever holding any gov. job again, along with a host of other.

I'm looking forward to a 3 way race.

I'm not; I believe that would be a shoe-in for the Democrats and four more years to 'Finish the Job'.

My focus on the election boils down to one thing. Don't even mention lowering my SS or Medicare. It's the principal of the thing....I'm still paying into both. Pissing off the seniors is a quick path to political suicide.

You don't really believe the Democrats will protect SS do you?

.

I don't recall mentioning any political party. I've been a Libertarian since the Gov. Johnson days; Pretty much the old geezers party...they feel the same way I do.

btw....our membership is growing!!

I must admit however, your scenario seems more than plausible!!

a reply to: yuppa

Isn't it amazing how many 'moles' there were around who only got found out when they stated facts at variance to what Trump thought was the truth. He made it all the way to the 2020 Election, stated that he had not seen any irregularities and was fired the same day by Trump for the crime of saying that Biden had been fairly elected. Oh horrors!

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
a reply to: nugget1

Christopher Krebs, the director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency - appointed by Trump - said that the election was fair and there were no widespread irregularities of the kind that Trump was ranting wildly about.
Trump fired him.

Trumps admin appointed him not trump personally. and we all know there were moles in trumps admin.

I distinctly remember, trump said...I hire all the best people

jezebel.com...

www.businessinsider.nl... n-do-not-want-him-to-be-president-again/

a reply to: Mahogany

The people in this thread defending Trump... do you really, truly, after years and years of tens of thousands of documented lies and dozens of failed lawsuits really still believe a single word this man says?

Yet you don't seem to apply this standard to media, intel agencies, investigative bodies or other politicians................

a reply to: nugget1

"The Republicans will be 'allowed' to regain majority power in all three houses and introduce a bill to end/replace SS with a UBI. OR ending SS will be hidden in another bill the MUST be passed. "

If the Dems lose, then it's their fault what the GOP does...?
wow

originally posted by: Mahogany
The people in this thread defending Trump... do you really, truly, after years and years of tens of thousands of documented lies and dozens of failed lawsuits really still believe a single word this man says?

Can you really be that gullible? Or do you know he's a liar and he's just making stuff up left and right, but you just choose to go along with the lies?

Which one is it? I have a very hard time believing people can be so naive for so many years.

Trump is a con man. He is a poor man's idea of a rich man, a weak man's idea of a strong man and a stupid man's idea of a smart man.

2 words.

Steele Dossier.

originally posted by: Mahogany
The people in this thread defending Trump... do you really, truly, after years and years of tens of thousands of documented lies and dozens of failed lawsuits really still believe a single word this man says?

Can you really be that gullible? Or do you know he's a liar and he's just making stuff up left and right, but you just choose to go along with the lies?

Which one is it? I have a very hard time believing people can be so naive for so many years.

Trump is a con man. He is a poor man's idea of a rich man, a weak man's idea of a strong man and a stupid man's idea of a smart man.

The people in this thread attacking Trump based on MSM reports...do you really, truly, after years and years of tens of thousands of documented lies really still believe a single word the MSM says?

Can you really be that gullible? Or do you know MSM lies and just makesstuff up left and right, but you just choose to go along with the lies?

a reply to: Blueracer

I always sorta thought we were allowed to replace the government when it goes rogue. But then I remembered we live in a police state now and the president was surrounded by "never Trumpers."

a reply to: Blueracer

Huh? Media? Nah, prefer to listen to his own attorneys and employees who testified under oath he told them to destroy documents, move documents, hide documents. Prefer to follow where all his "election fraud" donations actually went. I mean you dispute his lawyers and his employees testimony, texts, photos?

a reply to: frogs453
Of course. The MSM. That is where you get your talking points from. They use words like "Capital Attack" and then you are convinced that it was a capital attack. In some people's minds, Trump is guilty of orchestrating the capital attack because that is what the media said when no such thing happened. You know that but you do not care. Trump is a meanie!

It is like people do not even think for themselves.

a reply to: DBCowboy

they said on CNN it was mostly true. Mostly.

originally posted by: Blueracer
a reply to: frogs453
Of course. The MSM. That is where you get your talking points from. They use words like "Capital Attack" and then you are convinced that it was a capital attack. In some people's minds, Trump is guilty of orchestrating the capital attack because that is what the media said when no such thing happened. You know that but you do not care. Trump is a meanie!

It is like people do not even think for themselves.

And, you completely ignored what I posted. You do not believe his own attorneys, employees, their own texts, audio, photos and testimony under oath? You do not believe the financial disclosures of what his fund was used for?

Nice attempt to deflect though.

originally posted by: TheBoomersRBusted
a reply to: nugget1

"The Republicans will be 'allowed' to regain majority power in all three houses and introduce a bill to end/replace SS with a UBI. OR ending SS will be hidden in another bill the MUST be passed. "

If the Dems lose, then it's their fault what the GOP does...?
wow

Do you really think they don't work together towards the same goal? WOW!