UFO hunter claims new photos are ‘definitive evidence’ that ‘we are not alone’

P900 will do video too. Wonder why he didn't??

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Gothmog

Which further factors the outcome down .

I think that one factor has greatly reduced the chances of advance life of any kind. I can see going to another planet teeming with life and fine fungus and plants mostly.

There is some redeeming points :
“I'm sure the universe is full of intelligent life. It's just been too intelligent to come here.” - Clarke
“I think the surest sign that there is intelligent life out there in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.”
Watterson
"The reason why we have not found other intelligent life in the cosmos ? We have to find it here first" - Goth .

a reply to: Gothmog

I look at this chart below and think to myself…. we’ve possibly attracted alien life extraterrestrially, subterraneously, aquaterrestrially, and Interdimensionally….to ourselves

We may have unknowingly even helped to open portals.


👽

a reply to: mikell

If I was in that situation I would prefer photos, as they have a higher resolution, then, if I had the time, a video, to show it moving.

Video is overrated, it rarely gives more information than a photo of the same resolution and photos, usually, have higher resolutions and overall image quality, as the image is less compressed in photos (some cameras can even save photos in uncompressed format and with a higher colour depth).

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

I look at this chart below and think to myself…. we’ve possibly attracted alien life extraterrestrially, subterraneously, aquaterrestrially, and Interdimensionally….to ourselves

Nope.
We are a helluva long way from a type III civilization .

We have gazillion mega pixel cameras in our phones yet EVERY flying saucer photo I've ever seen is fuzzy, blurry, dark, etc. etc. etc. Why do you think that is?

originally posted by: gakare
We have gazillion mega pixel cameras in our phones yet EVERY flying saucer photo I've ever seen is fuzzy, blurry, dark, etc. etc. etc. Why do you think that is?

It is not about the phones or lenses. The object in focus is inside the field that makes it slightly distorted. Edges washed and what not.
It is also might appear bigger than when it is at rest.

Real evidence is told by

Chris bledsoe Sr

There are 2 types of ufos

Benevolent orbs

And military craft

Anything on TV is propaganda to brainwash you In to believing the official version.

Covid was the great wake up call and, if believe anything on TV then your still in the matrix

originally posted by: Gothmog
There is some redeeming points :
“I'm sure the universe is full of intelligent life. It's just been too intelligent to come here.” - Clarke
“I think the surest sign that there is intelligent life out there in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.”
Watterson
"The reason why we have not found other intelligent life in the cosmos ? We have to find it here first" - Goth .

Well, the other aspect of intelligent life is that it will be based on preditors since cows don't need a lot of intelligence to hunt grass. Hawkings suggested that we should not find it as we might not be too happy if we do.

a reply to: DaydreamerV

That's an effect of JPEG compression, you can also see the "field" around the tops of the trees.

And yes, it's a question of resolution, as that camera has a resolution much higher than the photo published shows.

fun to think about but we still don't have solid proof. Always a blurry photo.

a reply to: jidnum

I know AI is quickly advancing and it could be a good or bad thing, or maybe both to some extent. . . I mention that because I've always wondered if we'd every reach a point where technology will be developed to read our minds and reproduce video/images of things we've seen.

I saw a UFO when I was a kid, with my mother. I have no way of knowing whether or not it was alien, but I'd sure like to find out. It was strange. We saw it and talked about it in the car, but never talked about it or told anyone about it for some time. I used to remember it and want to tell someone, but never could remember to mention it. So strange. . .

Anyway, I would like to hook my brain to something that could recreate exactly what we saw, because I have a hard time describing it in great detail, even though I remember it vividly. The best I can say is that it was probably 500-1,000ft above the ground. it was about half the size of an aircraft carrier, and it looked just like what you'd see if you were looking down on a city from above.

a reply to: esteay812

Hypnosis has its detractors….but it’s worth a try…if you have money you can afford to loose.

👽

originally posted by: esteay812

I know AI is quickly advancing and it could be a good or bad thing, or maybe both to some extent. . . I mention that because I've always wondered if we'd every reach a point where technology will be developed to read our minds and reproduce video/images of things we've seen.

I wonder if the course for natural intelligence is it always ends up with AI at some point that basically replaces nature intelligence. UFOs could just be AI that is not affected by space or time.

originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: DaydreamerV

That's an effect of JPEG compression, you can also see the "field" around the tops of the trees.

And yes, it's a question of resolution, as that camera has a resolution much higher than the photo published shows.

I agree. Most likely this is the jpeg artifact. But if you capture such a detailed foreground image with trees, how to expect an object miles away to maintain almost same detail?

a reply to: DaydreamerV

How can you know that the object is "miles away"?

To know that we would need to know the size of the object, and we do not know that.

The photo isn't good enough and doesn't have enough information for us to use "distance fog" to judge for relative distance either.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Everyone who spends all this time looking at pictures of ufos is being deceived. They are taking your attention away from what really matters in life. People spend so much time talking about "space, and "planets", and "aliens" that they have forgotten about each other. That's the real tragedy in this world

originally posted by: CelestialAnomaly
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Everyone who spends all this time looking at pictures of ufos is being deceived. They are taking your attention away from what really matters in life. People spend so much time talking about "space, and "planets", and "aliens" that they have forgotten about each other. That's the real tragedy in this world

True Enough……

I, We, are a species in decline….we are doomed to become a past civilization. I don’t have much hope in humanity these days. I can only try to live a good honest life until my number is called. Loving is becoming harder and harder to do.

Some religious people have said……if it wasn’t for their belief that Suicide is a sin….they would have off’d themselves long ago….but faith keeps them going. God gave life to experience with its ups and downs….to die by one’s own hands and means is an affront to God’s reason, whatever that may mean, for giving one existence in the first place.

👽

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1

originally posted by: andy1972
So, as you can barely see the UFO(?) as it is, how can he say it had a "force field" around it?

Well….let’s see…..here’s the image zoomed in even more……..now, I’ve turned “brightness” all the way down….and “shadows” all the way up…

Clearly as one can see, what appears to be is a (in one’s own interpretation and speculation) ….. “force field”, “Corona”, “halo” , “anti-gravity field”, “energy field”, or just “field” etc. or other words to describe whatever it is that’s surrounding or enveloping the craft.

Interestingly, I find what appears to be some sort of distinct low amplitude sign-wave line of the field at the bottom of the craft shape.

I don’t think anyone at this point can pin down what is generating what’s surrounding it. To say “force field” without proof is speculative. Imo….I would simply use the word “field” as a generic proof-less root cause, asserted benign description.

👽

All I can see is the cookie monster

Kids having fun..!!

Who am I to take that away from them..!

Those guys (aliens) have been here for a long time..!

When you start looking for the evidence, as hard or harder than I did, some of us get the grand tour to get us to shut up, and then wham..!

Your life no longer has a purpose.! Because you now understand why you and those like you, who know, can't talk about it either...!

Those guys are very real, but how does that matter if you can't talk about it at all...??

Keep looking, trust me, you'll surely find what you're looking for...!