It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NASA obvious fake footage

page: 7
22
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 26 2023 @ 11:32 AM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

Sorry, ancient massive holes in the ground don’t prove meteorites broke through Heaven’s glass.

And pretty much anybody on a conspiracy site should just know the moon missions were/are fraud.



posted on Jun, 26 2023 @ 11:35 AM
link   
a reply to: InachMarbank

What do you think meteorites are and where do they come from?



posted on Jun, 26 2023 @ 11:39 AM
link   
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Actually the glass does reflect city lights to some extent. It’s too far away for the city lights to make shapes and impressions on the glass. But city lights on the glass are the reason you can’t see stars at night in many big cities, especially NYC.



posted on Jun, 26 2023 @ 11:44 AM
link   
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Not sure where the get shot from. Just know they don’t come crashing thru Heaven’s glass. And pretty sure they make excellent fertilizer for wild plants as they burn up in the atmosphere.



posted on Jun, 26 2023 @ 11:45 AM
link   
a reply to: InachMarbank

No, that because of light pollution.

britastro.org...



posted on Jun, 26 2023 @ 11:49 AM
link   
a reply to: InachMarbank

"Shot from"?!!!!

Most of them are not composed of anything that might act as a fertiliser. Iron is not great for your garden, for instance.

Why might they do that if they burn up and how do they get be going so fast so they burn up?



posted on Jun, 26 2023 @ 11:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Yes, Moonbats.
edit on 26-6-2023 by tachyonator9 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 26 2023 @ 12:08 PM
link   
a reply to: tachyonator9

Please tell me, that was sarcasm?



posted on Jun, 26 2023 @ 01:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: AlienBorg

"The burden of proof is on NASA to come clear and prove they are not withholding information from the public in relation to alien life and UFOs or other matters. Until they will come forward I will assume they have information and are withholding it."

So, you want them to prove a negative?


What is a negative?

Given they don't have much credibility and reliability and given they are funded by taxpayers the burden of proof in on them. Need to come clean they don't withhold information. I think it's reasonable.



posted on Jun, 26 2023 @ 01:18 PM
link   
a reply to: anonentity

If the US said it, it's a lie.



posted on Jun, 26 2023 @ 01:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

That should've been obvious.



posted on Jun, 26 2023 @ 02:07 PM
link   
Move on, nothing to see here.




posted on Jun, 26 2023 @ 02:36 PM
link   
a reply to: InachMarbank

Absolute nonsense.

And nothing more than lens flare or a mirage of sorts.

But we simply cannot teach pork.



posted on Jun, 26 2023 @ 03:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: InachMarbank
a reply to: yuppa

Sorry, ancient massive holes in the ground don’t prove meteorites broke through Heaven’s glass.

And pretty much anybody on a conspiracy site should just know the moon missions were/are fraud.



No the moon missions were not a hoax. If they were Russia would had already exsposed it.

No stars? debunked. how? Moons surface is reflective and its light pollution is so high it drowns out stars from surface level.

Weird SHadows? Light is all around and makes shadows in weird ways due to reflectivity and sunlight.

Flag blowing? Had a wire in it to make it appear to blow in the wind because the wire in the top wasnt quite long enough.

Van allen belts radiation.Debunked. The craft had shielding which blocked almost all the radiation and the spot they went through was thinner. They didnt get no more than a few x rays worth of rads.

DENY IGNORANCE.



posted on Jun, 26 2023 @ 03:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Olivine and feldspar dominate the composition of a meteorite and those compounds do make for good fertilizer.



posted on Jun, 26 2023 @ 03:28 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake

Lens flares are caused by the actual sun behind the glass projecting onto your lens. I explained this earlier to yuppa and how you can easily photograph it. What you call a mirage is actually a reflection of the sun on Heaven’s glass.



posted on Jun, 26 2023 @ 03:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

One way mirror effect, to some extent



posted on Jun, 26 2023 @ 03:36 PM
link   



posted on Jun, 26 2023 @ 03:42 PM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

Russia’s Sputnik mission was also fraud.

It is reported the thermosphere has radiation capable of heating particles up to 2000 degrees Celsius. That would destroy a rocket. However that is irrelevant to this debate because the rocket isn’t going to get past Heaven.

Unknown what the universe looks like from the moon, how powerful the wind is, and how powerful the light is. It is reported there are gamma rays on the moon, so I think that might quickly vaporize a rocket, and instantly vaporize a flag.



posted on Jun, 26 2023 @ 03:43 PM
link   
a reply to: InachMarbank

So, not glass, now a "one way mirror"?

Which way, and how does that fit with your sun reflection guff?



new topics

top topics



 
22
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join