Corrupt DOJ Gives Evidence of What They Say Are Donald Trump Crimes - to His Lawyers.

a reply to: matafuchs

Defense counsel confirmed they do not oppose an adjournment of the current trial date and request a status hearing with the Court to address the schedule of this action.

Smith filed a motion.

The Justice Department asked a judge on Friday night to postpone until December the criminal trial of former President Donald Trump for retaining classified documents. U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon earlier this week set an initial trial date of Aug. 14 for Trump, who faces 37 felony counts accusing him of illegally hoarding classified documents and obstructing Justice Department efforts to get them back.

But Smith, in the filing, said the Aug. 14 date "would deny counsel for the defendant or the attorney for the Government the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation."

What prep does the attorney for the Government need? I thought this was slam dunk from the Grand Jury...

and the response? This is a quote from the justice department not Trumps lawyers.

The Justice Department said Trump’s lawyers do not object to pushing the trial date back. The judge will ultimately set the trial date.

Link

and finally, from another source....

He said Trump's lawyers do not oppose scrapping the Aug. 14 trial start date but he anticipates they will file a motion opposing the prosecution's proposed schedule. A lawyer for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Link

They are anticipating Trumps lawyers to act to postpone. This is an old tactic to keep things wrapped up in court.

a reply to: matafuchs

They're not anticipating anything. They spoke with Trump's lawyers when putting together the motion. Trump's lawyers told the DOJ they have no problem adjourning the trial date but they will most likely oppose the DOJ's amended schedule.

a reply to: Threadbare

So they are opposed AND agreed with it so they can do something later? Your comment makes no sense.

a reply to: Xtrozero

Aren't they claiming they decided to charge him when he ranted and waved some docs around in front of someone interviewing him?

That doesn't sound like Espionage to me. Where is the foreign and/or enemy in this incident?

It doesn't even seem like spillage to me if all he did was wave the document around. Did the interviewer even get a look at it?

a reply to: matafuchs

As I said previously, Trump's team agrees with delaying the start date but they don't agree with the pace the DOJ is trying to set. They want the pace to be even slower.

a reply to: Threadbare


When did they state they want it to be slower?

originally posted by: MrInquisitive

You went through all that effort just to be rude, good job!

originally posted by: Threadbare
What country did Kendra Kingsbury sell secrets to?

Former FBI analyst sentenced to nearly 4 years over classified docs

Wow! You found one...lol let's look at it and compare...

In your post... and she got 3.5 years

In their sentencing memo, prosecutors said, "The FBI ultimately determined that over 20,000 documents that originated either at the FBI or some other government agency were found in the defendant’s residence."

Here is the big one... WAS SHE THE PRESIDENT... Does that mean anything to any of you?

What should Biden get, what should Hilary have gotten? Her's was kind of damning in favor of Trump. Even though she had phones destroyed and Bleachbit the evidence the FBI said she had no ill-intent to do anything with the documents that she illegally stored, illegally destroyed, lied etc...

Was Biden or Hillary the President? All good there I guess...

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels

Aren't they claiming they decided to charge him when he ranted and waved some docs around in front of someone interviewing him?

That doesn't sound like Espionage to me. Where is the foreign and/or enemy in this incident?

It doesn't even seem like spillage to me if all he did was wave the document around. Did the interviewer even get a look at it?

Were they even classified by that time...

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: Xtrozero

Aren't they claiming they decided to charge him when he ranted and waved some docs around in front of someone interviewing him?

That doesn't sound like Espionage to me. Where is the foreign and/or enemy in this incident?

It doesn't even seem like spillage to me if all he did was wave the document around. Did the interviewer even get a look at it?

it could have been his picture on the cover of time mag.

a reply to: Xtrozero

From the transcript of the conversation, Trump believed they were still classified.

But interpretations of what Trump says out of context have proven to be open to interpretation in the past.

a reply to: Xtrozero

She got 3.5 years on two charges and a guilty plea. Trump is facing 31 charges of 18 USC 793 (e) and has chosen to go to trial. If found guilty he will be facing a lot more time. Although, at his age, even 3.5 years could be a life sentence.

She was as much the President as Trump has been since January 20, 2021.

originally posted by: Threadbare

She got 3.5 years on two charges and a guilty plea. Trump is facing 31 charges of 18 USC 793 (e) and has chosen to go to trial. If found guilty he will be facing a lot more time. Although, at his age, even 3.5 years could be a life sentence.

She was as much the President as Trump has been since January 20, 2021.

20,000 documents without the authority of a President and got 2 charges... Trump has 31 charges because there are 31 documents and faces 100 years. Also, documents he could declassify at will, something Biden or Hillary or this Woman never had the power to do.

Your argument is so weak and you either don't see it or just don't care. If it was someone else they would maybe take their National Archive library card away.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels

From the transcript of the conversation, Trump believed they were still classified.

But interpretations of what Trump says out of context have proven to be open to interpretation in the past.

As President are we really going down the path to say well he took them on Tuesday and didn't declassify them until the next day, so Tuesday he broke the law, or some other play the timeline game? He was President with full powers to do at will with the documents, end of the story.

After that, it was a bureaucratic archive event...

a reply to: Xtrozero

There's an audiotape of him in July 2021 showing off a classified document to people without clearances, he admits it's classified, and he states that he didn't declassify it.

Who was President in July 2021?

a reply to: Xtrozero

Over 200,000 pages of documents were seized from Trump. Over 300 documents were classified.

originally posted by: Threadbare

There's an audiotape of him in July 2021 showing off a classified document to people without clearances, he admits it's classified, and he states that he didn't declassify it.

Who was President in July 2021?

Would you like to see him go to jail? Should we arrest Biden, Hillary, Obama, and 1000s of others because they had classified at some level, at some point in time when they should have either not had it (Hillary/Biden) or had it after their time in office?

You are working really hard here to justify something that really is not a big deal until the liberals made it a big deal. Much like his two impeachments... We can make anything a big deal if that is what we want, right?

a reply to: Xtrozero

He should go to jail if he was intentionally sharing classified information with people not authorized to have that information. And wouldn't you know it, we have him on tape doing that very thing.

originally posted by: Threadbare

Over 200,000 pages of documents were seized from Trump. Over 300 documents were classified.

You ninny...lol Trump's lawyers complained that the FBI took over 200,000 documents from Trump...Not that Trump had 200,000 documents he should not have had...geez The lady had over 20,000 documents she should not have had. 300 classified documents are also a claim that boiled down to 31... The term Confidential is a classification too, so is proprietary...

You really dislike Trump, don't you...