10,000 Images Leaked From Hunter Biden Laptop

a reply to: frogs453 Since you discussed "what sickens you", let me state what sickens me. People dismissing the laptop story as "obviously made up". You have no more idea than I do. Yet you have made up your mind. Both sides of the Republican/Democrat clown show have made up their mind.

a reply to: KnightSeeker

Again I never said it's made up. I said Bannon who spread the drive to other sources admitted they altered it. Which leads a ton of problems knowing what is real and what was added as a member of the public. I will not apologize for finding people gleefully sharing cp sickening.

a reply to: frogs453

It figures you'd be more offended by the people calling for truth and justice than you are by the people who are actually involved in the unlawful solicitation of minors. Fake outrage.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: network dude

Cute. I don't think anyone is denying Hunter is in images being a crackhead.

everyone knows you fake frauds’ tone would change quick if this was Eric or Don Jr.

a reply to: TheMadTitan

Yeah , and 600 of them are of Hunter Snorting Parmesan Cheese......

Confirmed 6.2.2023

ESTABLISHED SOURCES who LOVE OUR COUNTRY are coming forward.

Example 1: www.foxnews.com...

Just think, these sources told President Trump that Joe Biden was up to no good. He got impeached by DemocRATS for daring to ask officials to investigate Joe Biden!

Grrrrrr

Can someone who is literate with the process please just upload all the images onto this thread so we can make some popcorn n scroll already?

I dont like external links... and not to mention endless articles on the matter of 10,000 images. Enough with the words... where are the images!??? seriously!

It's interesting to me that it recently came out AI is capable of cloning not just voices but videos. That may add a layer of protection for Hunter and family, but it also presents a problem for

'audio evidence in a grand jury provided by someone who worked for him, and also testified under oath, who was at the meeting and actually was mentioned in the autobiography that the meeting was discussing'.

Are we being programmed to believe nothing but what our preferred party tells us is true?

In war, the first casualty is truth. Politics looks more like a war zone every day.

originally posted by: PurpleFox
everyone knows you fake frauds’ tone would change quick if this was Eric or Don Jr.

I'm almost certain they're coke heads, and idgaf.

originally posted by: combatmaster
where are the images!??? seriously!

The site sucks, but I've managed to get in it a couple times today. Nothing we haven't seen before. Hookers and blow.

Fake photos and info by the FBI and CIA.
to discreadit any info and investigations.

All the photos with ANY thing sexy on them
have been marks out with photo shop!

Well THEY have had YEARS to work on this!

when the gaurds are stealing from you and cooking
to Books to make it look like Nothing is gone.
Give up or Get new gaurds.
just make shour that the new gaurds
have nothing to do with the old ones.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: KnightSeeker

Again I never said it's made up. I said Bannon who spread the drive to other sources admitted they altered it. Which leads a ton of problems knowing what is real and what was added as a member of the public. I will not apologize for finding people gleefully sharing cp sickening.

I've seen you reference this at least 7 or 8 times in this thread so just curious when you did you start trusting Steve Bannon and have you always believed everything he said? I thought he was considered a liar in the past by the left and guilty by association, but now he is the go to with all things Hunter Biden? not saying he didn't say what you said he said but just never believed the left would close the case based on Steve Bannon's word. also if he said just the opposite would you keep referencing him in this thread in "your quest for truth"?

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: network dude

Cute. I don't think anyone is denying Hunter is in images being a crackhead.

except for you that is.

That's a stupid remark even for you. The person just wrote they didn't think anyone is denying HB is in images being a crackhead, and yet you write "except for you that is". Clearly the poster is acknowledging said images. You just like to gratuitously jibe people who disagree with you, don't you? Even when they post something you can't dispute.

originally posted by: LordAhriman
What is it with you all and Hunter's nudes?

Because they're basically a bunch of gossipy old biddies at heart.

Great big swollen bollocks.

Photos of "asshat" in the nude means nothing.
Photos of "asshat" being flirty with minors and drugs... now that's punishable.

originally posted by: MrInquisitive

originally posted by: LordAhriman
What is it with you all and Hunter's nudes?

Because they're basically a bunch of gossipy old biddies at heart.

Shouldn’t that bring the left and right together? It’s good to finally have some common ground to walk.

originally posted by: dandandat2

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: frogs453

So what you're saying is that a cache of photos of questionable provenance was uploaded just days after it was announced that the DOJ has an audio recording of Trump pretty much torpedoing his own defense in the documents case?

I'm sure the timing isn't coincidental at all.

The question I have is; Why are aligations with "questionable provenance" regarding Trump audio all over news media while photos with "questionable provenance" regarding Hunter Biden are barely talked about?


But I agree with you; its hard to take aligations of "questionable provenance" seriously ... especially in DC where even unquestionably evidence is ignored or lied about by instigators.

Nothing will happen to Hunter and nothing will happen to Trump (except maybe he will lose another election based on questionable circumstances)

The Trump audiotape isn't of questionable provenance. Read the article to find out where it came from; it's linked in the OP of that thread. It's also already been admitted as evidence to a grand jury, and several eye witnesses have attested to the same.

It's quite different from pictures showing up on the internet of uncertain origin. If these pictures and other documents truly came from a laptop owned by HB, then there is the matter of the legality of others having and sharing the data.

Here's an article on the sketchy provenance of the data:

Now warning about Hunter Biden-laptop disinfo: The guy who leaked it

originally posted by: Kreeate
Great big swollen bollocks.

Photos of "asshat" in the nude means nothing.
Photos of "asshat" being flirty with minors and drugs... now that's punishable.

I couldn't care less about him doing drugs, but after many years of supposed LaPtOp photos, I've yet to see a real one of him doing anything questionable with a minor.

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: Kreeate
Great big swollen bollocks.

Photos of "asshat" in the nude means nothing.
Photos of "asshat" being flirty with minors and drugs... now that's punishable.

I couldn't care less about him doing drugs, but after many years of supposed LaPtOp photos, I've yet to see a real one of him doing anything questionable with a minor.

Hence my post. I've not seen any evidence of him doing anything questionable with minors.
I couldn't care less if he smokes crack, has "associations" with prostitutes, or if he eats his own boogers.
What he legally does in his personal life is his business.

Here's the issue though... I highly doubt that any photos of him fiddling with minors would be published.
This kind of evidence would be locked behind a legal wall for obvious reasons.
The fact that we have not seen any photos of HB being frisky with minors, does not mean that he hasn't.
It simply means we haven't seen it. It's up to the legal system to sort that out.
Corruption being what it is... who knows if we'll ever know the truth?

originally posted by: MrInquisitive

originally posted by: dandandat2

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: frogs453

So what you're saying is that a cache of photos of questionable provenance was uploaded just days after it was announced that the DOJ has an audio recording of Trump pretty much torpedoing his own defense in the documents case?

I'm sure the timing isn't coincidental at all.

The question I have is; Why are aligations with "questionable provenance" regarding Trump audio all over news media while photos with "questionable provenance" regarding Hunter Biden are barely talked about?


But I agree with you; its hard to take aligations of "questionable provenance" seriously ... especially in DC where even unquestionably evidence is ignored or lied about by instigators.

Nothing will happen to Hunter and nothing will happen to Trump (except maybe he will lose another election based on questionable circumstances)

The Trump audiotape isn't of questionable provenance. Read the article to find out where it came from; it's linked in the OP of that thread. It's also already been admitted as evidence to a grand jury, and several eye witnesses have attested to the same.

It's quite different from pictures showing up on the internet of uncertain origin. If these pictures and other documents truly came from a laptop owned by HB, then there is the matter of the legality of others having and sharing the data.

Here's an article on the sketchy provenance of the data:

Now warning about Hunter Biden-laptop disinfo: The guy who leaked it

Every Trump or Desantis accusation is super serious and beyond questioning.
Every Clinton-Obama-Biden accusation is fake and debunked.
This is simply a given.

There just are no words to explain this condition.
Maybe “sad” will suffice.