10,000 Images Leaked From Hunter Biden Laptop

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: TheMadTitan

it's all photoshop. Rudy is very good at it. Nothing to see here.

Hahaha ….. you pre-spoofed those who would run on here yelping “fake !!!” …… and yet they all came a-runnin’, just like Pavlov’s dogs.
The pre-embarrassment couldn’t even slow them down.

a reply to: stevieray

You would think the embarrassed ones are the ones who did not know it had been manipulated, not the ones who were aware and heard Bannon say so.

originally posted by: DoubleDNH

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: frogs453

Are you good with Hunter having access to classified docs going back years? Are you good with Hunter currently staying in the White House? I wonder if he is ever in the oval office, a SCIF?

I am about as good with Hunter having access to classified docs as I am about either of Trump's coke-addeled sons having the same access.

Do you have any evidence of either of Trumps sons having a drug problem? We have strong evidence that Hunter has, in the laptop. If the Trump kids had a similar problem, they would have screwed up and left evidence behind somewhere one would think. If not they would be the first COMPETENT drug addicts I've ever heard of, under the kind of scrutiny the Trumps have and are still under.

So, put up or shut up.

originally posted by: DoubleDNH

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: frogs453

Are you good with Hunter having access to classified docs going back years? Are you good with Hunter currently staying in the White House? I wonder if he is ever in the oval office, a SCIF?

I am about as good with Hunter having access to classified docs as I am about either of Trump's coke-addeled sons having the same access.

Couldn’t say Hunter without saying Trump, plus random insult. Bless your little heart.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: stevieray

You would think the embarrassed ones are the ones who did not know it had been manipulated, not the ones who were aware and heard Bannon say so.

You “know” these photos that just surfaced a couple hours ago ……. Are “manipulated” ?
Just wow. I couldn’t write this for you, if you were begging to be spoofed.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels

originally posted by: DoubleDNH

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: frogs453

Are you good with Hunter having access to classified docs going back years? Are you good with Hunter currently staying in the White House? I wonder if he is ever in the oval office, a SCIF?

I am about as good with Hunter having access to classified docs as I am about either of Trump's coke-addeled sons having the same access.

Do you have any evidence of either of Trumps sons having a drug problem? We have strong evidence that Hunter has, in the laptop. If the Trump kids had a similar problem, they would have screwed up and left evidence behind somewhere one would think. If not they would be the first COMPETENT drug addicts I've ever heard of, under the kind of scrutiny the Trumps have and are still under.

So, put up or shut up.

We’ve already descended into “say anything and derail”.
It happens this quickly when they’re really mad about something that they have no answer for.

a reply to: stevieray

Sigh. Did I say that? Bannon said that the copy of the hard drive that he was given and copied and handed to other sources had Weingui as the guy who had the "editorial creativity" to upload stuff to the drive. Maxxey states that the more salacious stuff and CCP stuff was added by Wengui.

So was this part of it? Who knows. Did it come from the same drive? If not, there's a new drive? Where did that come from?

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: dandandat2


Slightly different to have audio evidence in a grand jury provided by someone who worked for him, and also testified under oath, who was at the meeting and actually was mentioned in the autobiography that the meeting was discussing.

The other is about a copy of a hard drive that was uploaded by someone that stated they manipulated it. Not the original hard drive, not testified as authentic in a court of law.

Do you see a difference or no?

Sure I see the difference; one is regarding a washington insider the other is regarding an outsider.

If you think this is all anything more than a power struggle between several opposing political factions your only fooling your self.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels

originally posted by: DoubleDNH

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: frogs453

Are you good with Hunter having access to classified docs going back years? Are you good with Hunter currently staying in the White House? I wonder if he is ever in the oval office, a SCIF?

I am about as good with Hunter having access to classified docs as I am about either of Trump's coke-addeled sons having the same access.

Do you have any evidence of either of Trumps sons having a drug problem? We have strong evidence that Hunter has, in the laptop. If the Trump kids had a similar problem, they would have screwed up and left evidence behind somewhere one would think. If not they would be the first COMPETENT drug addicts I've ever heard of, under the kind of scrutiny the Trumps have and are still under.

So, put up or shut up.

That's just how they justify not having a problem with the son of the goon they support. Trump's kids were dragged through the mud as bad as Trump was and no proof of anything nefarious was ever presented. If they'd had as much as a parking ticket, it would've been all over the news.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: network dude

Of course I have links. I've posted both before, but here you go.

Grassley on Fox.

"We are not interested in whether the allegations against Vice President Biden are accurate or not."

Link


And Comer:

Meanwhile, Mr Comer admitted in an interview that the GOP-led House Oversight Committee has only found things he feels “should be illegal” in their probes of the president’s family.

Link

Or watch the interview here

neither of those say "they really don't have anything". Comer layed out the way the money flows in the Biden business through the LLC's and to the family members, and with the Bobulinsky testimony, we have evidence of Joe's involvement.

And Grassley is just wanting to get the FBI to do their job and stop covering for the Bidens. Which is why they want to see this document, and know what has been done to investigate it. Lying only makes you look desperate. but if you are, then I totally understand.

originally posted by: frogs453


So was this part of it? Who knows. Did it come from the same drive? If not, there's a new drive? Where did that come from?

Sent straight from the Kremlin. Still smells like cabbage.

a reply to: network dude

So Comer flat out saying they have only found things that "should be illegal" means I'm lying by stating they haven't found illegality and Comer states they haven't found illegalities? Huh?

And Grassley stated himself he isn't even interested in whether the accusations are accurate, yet others have posted links that show the feds did investigate that document, yet you say that Grassley just wants the feds to stop protecting Biden? Again, huh?

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: network dude

So Comer flat out saying they have only found things that "should be illegal" means I'm lying by stating they haven't found illegality and Comer states they haven't found illegalities? Huh?

And Grassley stated himself he isn't even interested in whether the accusations are accurate, yet others have posted links that show the feds did investigate that document, yet you say that Grassley just wants the feds to stop protecting Biden? Again, huh?

they really don't have anything

I know, in the land of lies, the one who tells half truths is king.

It's cool, I can think for myself. But you do you.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: network dude

So Comer flat out saying they have only found things that "should be illegal" means I'm lying by stating they haven't found illegality and Comer states they haven't found illegalities? Huh?

And Grassley stated himself he isn't even interested in whether the accusations are accurate, yet others have posted links that show the feds did investigate that document, yet you say that Grassley just wants the feds to stop protecting Biden? Again, huh?

they really don't have anything

I know, in the land of lies, the one who tells half truths is king.

It's cool, I can think for myself. But you do you.

and if you don't mind, throw a link to the story of how the FBI has investigated the document they have yet to produce. This should be good.

Hey its the head of the committee stating this, but yeah think for yourself. I'm sure you know more than he does.


Once again, that's been posted here by other people multiple times, but here you go.

the form in question has origins in a tranche of documents that Rudy Giuliani provided to the Justice Department in 2020, people briefed on the matter said. The allegations of wrongdoing by the then-vice president, many originating from sources in Ukraine, were dubious enough that former Attorney General William Barr in early 2020 directed they be investigated by a US attorney in Pittsburgh, in part because Barr was concerned that Giuliani’s document tranche could taint the ongoing Hunter Biden investigation overseen by the Delaware US attorney.
The 1023 document being demanded by Comer is among the products of that investigation.

Link

originally posted by: frogs453
Hey its the head of the committee stating this, but yeah think for yourself. I'm sure you know more than he does.


Once again, that's been posted here by other people multiple times, but here you go.

the form in question has origins in a tranche of documents that Rudy Giuliani provided to the Justice Department in 2020, people briefed on the matter said. The allegations of wrongdoing by the then-vice president, many originating from sources in Ukraine, were dubious enough that former Attorney General William Barr in early 2020 directed they be investigated by a US attorney in Pittsburgh, in part because Barr was concerned that Giuliani’s document tranche could taint the ongoing Hunter Biden investigation overseen by the Delaware US attorney.
The 1023 document being demanded by Comer is among the products of that investigation.

Link

so Rudy Giuliani is the accuser in that paper, and the FBI wants to hide his identity, and release it at the same time. Sounds totally logical.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
Would you prefer he had not? The other people aren't suspected of crimes and may be victims of Hunters. Id say the author did the right thing. Don't you?

Right. "Trust me bro!"

a reply to: network dude

No, Rudy brought forth the document from the accuser. The accuser is not Rudy himself.

The FBI knew Trump wasn't guilty, yet they all signed off on it anyway. In fact its more then likely they all knew he was innocent. Now the FBI suggests that Hunter and Joe and Joes brother are not guilty of any crime and are telling you at the same time " don't believe your eyes, they lie, don't do your own research, you are not an expert. The robots you are looking for are not here. Nothing to see. We vetted everything. All well. Vote DNC!"

You go FBI!








To hell

a reply to: LordAhriman

I don't care about the photos. I care about the emails and business related stuff. I haven't checked that website for anything as it has server issues.

So it's all just word of mouth right now anyway.

I want business related content and nobody else to get hurt. So I don't GAF about Hunter and his sex selfies.