There's A Verdict in the E. Jean Carroll/Trump Case

originally posted by: Debunked

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: carewemust

No. You get there by having a daddy that has a lot of money.

Are you a millionaire? If not, then you must not have ever even had a $1000 to your name because that would be the equivalent of your accusation. He was given at most from my research $10 million and turned that into $7 Billion. Seems smart people make smart decisions and not so smart people don't. So my question again, are you a millionaire and if you are, who did it for you?

I love it when someone who isn’t qualified to polish Trumps jock, insults him all these different ways.
Self mockery is fun to watch.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
And Trump's meltdown on Truth Social has started. Do you think his lawyers don't have the balls to tell him to shut up or he just doesn't listen to them?

Yeah, he should stay quiet about the hit job by the left. Lol.

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: LSU2018

You don't prove it so much as convince a jury by your evidence before them that it was more likely than not that it happened.

Which she has done, apparently.

No evidence from him.

Odd, that?

Odd that no evidence was proven, yes.

The fun part is when Trump actually wins another presidency. You know it will be a gloves off approach this time. No reelection campaign in the future, so that's why they're so scared and you see all these vultures circling. They know it will be time to pay the piper if reelected.

What was the actual evidence in the case?
Was there DNA?
Any witnesses?

Trump’s screeching all over his custom propaganda platform (Lies Antisocial) that he wasn’t given the chance to defend himself. Which, of course, is yet another lie.

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: theatreboy

originally posted by: JIMC5499
a reply to: LSU2018

Statute of limitations is for a criminal offense. This is a Civil affair.

NY opened old SA cases up and extended the statute of limitations. She filed her CIVIL case right b4 they were closed back up.

Interesting
And this was the only case of merit?
That is simply unbelievable.

It was probably the easiest one to pull the big cheat with. They figured that the Blaise-Ford method might work in this highly corruptible scenario.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
Ive only had one question all along in this case. This was a public place! A deptment store dressing room. Why didn't she scream, before, during or after?

It's not OK to come back 30 years later and ask someone to defend themselves.

I don't care who they are.

She didn't have to. She accused Donald Trump of something so evidence and proof is neither needed, nor wanted.

Having said that, normal people will see this and shrug it off. Democrats entered the overkill stage years ago in their attempt to bring Trump down. It's old and lame now, it's gotten stale.

originally posted by: JIMC5499
a reply to: LSU2018

Statute of limitations is for a criminal offense. This is a Civil affair.

I might be able to find myself at a Bangles concert from some time in the 80's. Maybe I'll sue Hoff for sexual assault and use that picture for proof that I was in the same room. I mean, I'd never have turned her down, but that's not the point here.

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: LSU2018

You don't prove it so much as convince a jury by your evidence before them that it was more likely than not that it happened.

Which she has done, apparently.

No evidence from him.

Odd, that?

Odd that no evidence was proven, yes.

Odd that Trump refused to give any.

What are you on about?

The claimant gave evidence under oath. He didn't.

The jury believed her.

Case proven.

Good grief man.

She won.

Her EVIDENCE was believed.

Under. Oath.

How far will you go in trying to twist this?

originally posted by: dandandat2

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: network dude
Hmmm
Interesting use of the justice system
Looks like trump just got his ass kicked

Democrats are making Political Persecution a new campaign tool in the US.

Sure it helps them fight the great Hitler that is Donald Trump... but what will be the unintended consequences of their actions over the next century?

As long as Soros money keeps buying DA's and judges across the country and the DNC retains control BAMN they won't have to worry about it.

a reply to: LSU2018

Good grief.

I give up.

Most normal people over here (not Democrats or Republicans, like normal people) don't fall for your bs.

A unanimous verdict by a jury.

Nuff said.

He's a sex abuser. AKA a "nonce".

Carry on regardless.

Sad.

How much of the $2 million dollars will Carrol's Attorneys and the IRS get?

As usual, Trump's his own worst enemy. That deposition was a complete train wreck.
She didn't have to win; she just had to let him lose. What an idiot.

Imagine being Trump's lawyer, Tacopina, and trying to defend against this.

Statements and videos are being played from Trump himself, saying how he is a star and stars are allowed to do anything, including groping women by their privates, uninvited. And then watch him do the worst thing he could do in a case like this -- show complete indifference and not even show up to your own trial.

This jury of 6 men and 3 women took no time to see through all that. It's really bad when you can't even show your face to defend yourself.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

🤣🤣🤣

You guys got him now.

I’ll still vote for him.
He’s still far and away better than any Democrat, grabbing pussy or not.

a reply to: Gandalf77

Yep. Bet he didn't listen to his lawyers advice, I guess, cos he knew better.

Went off to Scotland to play golf instead.

What an arrogant Muppet.

a reply to: carewemust

It's $5 million.

Can't speak about attorney fees, but financial awards from civil suits are not taxable; not at the state or federal level.

Trump will get the ultimate win in the end like always. How many times have we seen this now? Stormy Daniels comes to mind and we all know how that played out. She ended up owing Trump all her book money and paid for the lawyer fees and her lawyer ended up in jail.

originally posted by: UKTruth
What was the actual evidence in the case?
Was there DNA?
Any witnesses?

Who needs evidence or proof when you're accusing Trump? They accuse him and he's supposed to show proof on how they're wrong.