There's A Verdict in the E. Jean Carroll/Trump Case

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Yep. Even gave him one last chance after he said he was cutting his Scotland trip short to confront Carroll.

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: LSU2018

Her evidence before the jury?

Part of it was Trump’s recorded admission that he just goes up and grabs women by their private parts. I guess the jury believed him.

What does that have to do with Carroll? She says he did it, he says he didn't. Where's the proof?

she didn't know when it happened, even what year it happened. But it happened, and she can tell you all the details, in fact, if you watch that one episode of law and order, it's just exactly like that.

But knowing your jury pool is key.

originally posted by: carewemust
Next up...

TARA READE vs JOE BIDEN

or maybe..

ASHLEY BIDEN vs JOE BIDEN for Pedo Sexual Assault.

a reply to: LSU2018

You don't prove it so much as convince a jury by your evidence before them that it was more likely than not that it happened.

Which she has done, apparently.

No evidence from him.

Odd, that?

originally posted by: Mantiss2021
a reply to: Xcalibur254

So now the question is:

How will this impact Trump's campaign plans?

Will the GOP be willing to back a candidate who has been deemed a sexual abuser?

That can't be a big vote draw among female "swing" voters; or even among female Republicans.

Do you think anyone who has paid any attention will actually believe that? And the sexual assault she's claiming is that he kissed her. OMG STOP THE PRESSES!!! TRUMP KISSES WOMAN!!!

What normal voting aged person out there gives two #s that he kissed some random chick in 1995 or 1996? His accuser can't even remember what year it was, but yeah let's take her word for it. LOL

a reply to: network dude

That juror that admitted to being a big Tim Pool fan must've really had it in for Trump.

originally posted by: UpThenDown
a reply to: PorkChop96

as you mentioned the Cosby case do you think he was innocent?, or are you stating if he beats the statute of limitations timescale he should be able to walk scot free despite being guilty?, sounds like the statute of limitations gives certain people a free pass if they can evade prosecution.

For me if someone is found guilty regardless of when the crime took place they should be punished accordingly

I am thinking jimmy Saville, rolf harris, gary glitter would have been able to be a pedo and walk free, thankfully in the UK we dont have such a timescale to allow such vile beasts to evade punishment for ever.

if she would have filed charges, he might have been arrested and jailed. But she didn't. In fact, she doesn't even know when it happened. So there is that.

a reply to: LSU2018

You name the crime: If you're a Trump and the trial is in New York, the Jury will find you Guilty. 100% of the time.

More election donations incoming.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: network dude

That juror that admitted to being a big Tim Pool fan must've really had it in for Trump.

the

NEW YORK

jury must have been a bunch of Trump fans, that's where most of them live. DERP

a reply to: network dude
Hmmm
Interesting use of the justice system
Looks like trump just got his ass kicked

And Trump's meltdown on Truth Social has started. Do you think his lawyers don't have the balls to tell him to shut up or he just doesn't listen to them?

a reply to: carewemust

Is there Any Connection between E. Jean Carroll and this Woman ? Same MO .......Hmm.........

Ive only had one question all along in this case. This was a public place! A deptment store dressing room. Why didn't she scream, before, during or after?

It's not OK to come back 30 years later and ask someone to defend themselves.

I don't care who they are.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Yup. He defamed her by denying it happened. Imagine the money that could be made just on that LARP alone. I'm in the wrong business.

a reply to: LSU2018

Statute of limitations is for a criminal offense. This is a Civil affair.

a reply to: network dude

Once again, one of the jurors was an admitted fan of Tim Pool. Does that sound like your caricature of a New York lib? All Trump needed was a single person that believed his non-existent defense.

Edited: Nevermind, I've mistaken this case as a different one a while back.

"I will not participate in a debate against a convicted rapist; to do so would be an affront to all berthing people" ~ Joe Biden September 2024.


Mission accomplished!

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
And Trump's meltdown on Truth Social has started. Do you think his lawyers don't have the balls to tell him to shut up or he just doesn't listen to them?

what is she going to do, sue him more?

He's pissed off that another grifter #ed him.

now why should he be angry about that?