There's A Verdict in the E. Jean Carroll/Trump Case

a reply to: LSU2018

Her evidence before the jury?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Wrong.

Jury finds guilty.

ETA: But you know that now.

a reply to: Mantiss2021

Not rape, sexual assault and battery, it seems.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
Claimant gave evidence

What evidence?

The judge tells the jurors they're allowed to talk about their experience with the press and identify themselves, but recommends they not do so for a long time.

Orders them not to reveal the identity of any other jurors.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
Jury says no to rape.
Yes to sexual abuse.
Yes to injury. - $2M award
Yes to falsity.
Yes to malice. - $280K award
Yes to defamation - $1M award

Jury also recommends an additional $1.7M in reputation repair.

So, nothing but a great payday for the lady. I'm sure that's all she was after. That and those behind her that want to make Trump look as evil as possible.

a reply to: starviego

Two weeks under oath?

Trump is saying he had no opportunity to give his side.

Seems that the Judge bent over backwards to give him the opportunity to give evidence.

Which he refused to do!

a reply to: LogicalGraphitti

Well, it's not exactly a good look for him, is it?!!!!

Yeah, "Fake News". And so on. Continues to page 94....

a reply to: Xcalibur254

So now the question is:

How will this impact Trump's campaign plans?

Will the GOP be willing to back a candidate who has been deemed a sexual abuser?

That can't be a big vote draw among female "swing" voters; or even among female Republicans.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: LSU2018

Her evidence before the jury?

Part of it was Trump’s recorded admission that he just goes up and grabs women by their private parts. I guess the jury believed him.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: LSU2018

Her evidence before the jury?

Yes, where's the evidence?

I guess you don't find it odd that the rape couldn't be proven, although it's the only thing that COULD have been proven, yet somehow or another it was proven that Trump committed battery and sexual assault on her. How can people be that #ing ignorant dude?

Another day, another failed attempt for the left to bring down Public Enemy #1. Dumbasses.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
The judge tells the jurors they're allowed to talk about their experience with the press and identify themselves, but recommends they not do so for a long time.

Orders them not to reveal the identity of any other jurors.

More money making opportunities for the jury members. They have juicy Trump trash-talk for the networks who will eat this up. This should give the networks something to talk about while the Biden crimes are exposed.

a reply to: 1947boomer

Didn't know that. Blimey.

a reply to: Mantiss2021

Will the GOP be willing to back a candidate who has been deemed a sexual abuser?

Why not? The DNC did it in 2020 for the win.

Reid Hoffman, the billionaire behind LinkedIn who’s now a megadonor to Democrats, has been quietly bankrolling E. Jean Carroll’s rape case against former President Donald Trump, according to court records filed Thursday.

[www.thedailybeast.com...]

Trumps has once again shot himself in the foot by what comes out of his own mouth. The one thing he really seems to excel at is not just giving his enemies ammunition, but loading their weapons for them.

a reply to: LSU2018

As I stated a minute ago, just some broad wanting her 15 minutes of fame to try and ruin some guys life for a monetary gain.

originally posted by: starviego

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
Claimant gave evidence

What evidence?

What evidence does a Trump accuser need? People are ignorant to think any of this could be proven. Sounds like a biased jury to me, I hope Trump countersues for double the cost.

All that without having to prove much of anything !!! 🤡

Guess Her book is worth 10x more now 😁

This'll all get reversed 😁

a reply to: LSU2018

Jeez.

The evidence under oath that was before the jury?

There's none so blind as them that won't see.

Suggest you contribute to his Appeal fund.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: LogicalGraphitti

Well, it's not exactly a good look for him, is it?!!!!

Yeah, "Fake News". And so on. Continues to page 94....

Ok, Oldcarpy, how do you prove you were sexually assaulted two and a half decades ago?

Next up...

TARA READE vs JOE BIDEN