It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MrInquisitive
originally posted by: UKTruth
Utter nonsense.
The conversation was about finding FRAUDULENT votes and the recognition that only 11,000 had to be found to change the result.
In the face of literally hundreds of affidavits with respect to fraudulent activity and the more than suspicious way the count unfolded on the night, it is a perfectly legitimate request. In fact it’s a request that is a duty to make.
As i have said before that the election was rigged it’s blatantly obvious. That it can’t be proven in a court of law it’s not required to know it happened. We all saw it unfold from the moment the state laws began to change to facilitate election rigging through the unsupervised counting, the inexplicable shut down of the counts and the dead of night miracle turnaround in Bidens favour.
Be happy your side win a rigged election if you want, but don’t gaslight.
Says the person who equates the US to North Korea. And for the record, Trump asked specifically for 10,801 votes -- just enough to overturn the state election result.
Literally hundreds of signed affidavits attesting to fraudulent voting activity? Then why didn't any of the court cases involving these matters, some adjudicated by Trump appointed judges, including appeals to SCOTUS, which had three Trump appointed judges, find in his favor?
You claim the voting fraud is blatantly obvious, so it doesn't matter if it isn't proven in court. Sorry, but that ain't how the rule of law works. Your the one trying to gaslight with your bio-methane. You make all these claims but can't substantiate them. If the country worked the way you want to, i.e. never mind findings of fact in courts of law, then we would be living in system like they have in North Korea.
As for your claim of the dead of night miracle turn around for Biden. It was well known by GOP election strategist consultants that the late-night votes would come from mail-ballots that were predominantly from Democrats. And before you start bad-mouthing voting by mail, remember that Trump himself voted in this fashion. Evidently it's good enough for him, but not for the little people in the big cities that tend to vote Democratic.
As for perfectly legitimate requests to reanalyze the vote, that is what was done by Trump supporters in Arizona, and they ended up tallying an even larger margin for Biden.
originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: putnam6
Ignore him. THIRTY-SEVEN posts so far today. Prior to this date his last post was June 30,2015.
Someone has been reactivated.
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: putnam6
Ignore him. THIRTY-SEVEN posts so far today. Prior to this date his last post was June 30,2015.
Someone has been reactivated.
Exactly, thus the gist of my post...
is it me or are we seeing this more and more
originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: putnam6
Ignore him. THIRTY-SEVEN posts so far today. Prior to this date his last post was June 30,2015.
Someone has been reactivated.
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: putnam6
Ignore him. THIRTY-SEVEN posts so far today. Prior to this date his last post was June 30,2015.
Someone has been reactivated.
Exactly, thus the gist of my post...
is it me or are we seeing this more and more
I am seeing a bit more of it the last month. The smell of desperation runs deep with some of these too.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: MrInquisitive
originally posted by: UKTruth
Utter nonsense.
The conversation was about finding FRAUDULENT votes and the recognition that only 11,000 had to be found to change the result.
In the face of literally hundreds of affidavits with respect to fraudulent activity and the more than suspicious way the count unfolded on the night, it is a perfectly legitimate request. In fact it’s a request that is a duty to make.
As i have said before that the election was rigged it’s blatantly obvious. That it can’t be proven in a court of law it’s not required to know it happened. We all saw it unfold from the moment the state laws began to change to facilitate election rigging through the unsupervised counting, the inexplicable shut down of the counts and the dead of night miracle turnaround in Bidens favour.
Be happy your side win a rigged election if you want, but don’t gaslight.
Says the person who equates the US to North Korea. And for the record, Trump asked specifically for 10,801 votes -- just enough to overturn the state election result.
Literally hundreds of signed affidavits attesting to fraudulent voting activity? Then why didn't any of the court cases involving these matters, some adjudicated by Trump appointed judges, including appeals to SCOTUS, which had three Trump appointed judges, find in his favor?
You claim the voting fraud is blatantly obvious, so it doesn't matter if it isn't proven in court. Sorry, but that ain't how the rule of law works. Your the one trying to gaslight with your bio-methane. You make all these claims but can't substantiate them. If the country worked the way you want to, i.e. never mind findings of fact in courts of law, then we would be living in system like they have in North Korea.
As for your claim of the dead of night miracle turn around for Biden. It was well known by GOP election strategist consultants that the late-night votes would come from mail-ballots that were predominantly from Democrats. And before you start bad-mouthing voting by mail, remember that Trump himself voted in this fashion. Evidently it's good enough for him, but not for the little people in the big cities that tend to vote Democratic.
As for perfectly legitimate requests to reanalyze the vote, that is what was done by Trump supporters in Arizona, and they ended up tallying an even larger margin for Biden.
10,801 because that was the difference. That is how many FRAUDULENT votes that would have to be found to change the result. Show me anywhere a transcript or source that there was a conversation about removing legitimate votes. After the 'very fine people' lies told by the media and democrat politicians (including the current President) , attempts to skew words and gaslight on meaning will not be successful.
No, it was not 'well known' that the mail in votes would be counted in secret, not included in the votes and then loaded via a thumb drive after the count had stopped only to be restarted in the early hrs.
As for the North Korea comment, arresting people and putting them in jail for questioning a Govt narrative is exactly the kind of behaviour they would exhibit. The US has made it a crime to ask questions and investigate extremely shady circumstances around an election. That makes them no better. If there was nothing to hide, there would not be so much resistance (and tyrannical response) to open and transparent investigation.
10,801 because that was the difference. That is how many FRAUDULENT votes that would have to be found to change the result.
originally posted by: JohnTitorSociety
Lobbying a state SoS on vote tabulation is not a crime, generally speaking. Worked on a few Presidential campaigns and many more lower campaigns.
Everyone tries to argue their position.
10k votes in Georgia in 2020 is a rounding error and within the margin of error of tabulation systems.
Trying to turn it into a crime is silly.
Thinking every single candidate for anything doesn’t try to do so is silly.
If Trump’s call to GA SoS is a crime, every candidate has been a criminal at some point.
a reply to: MrInquisitive
originally posted by: Mahogany
Way to deflect. There is nothing more un-American than a coup attempt.
It failed, but it was still a coup attempt. And now the collaborators are implicating the ring leader as the indictments get closer.
Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots
originally posted by: MrInquisitive
originally posted by: LSU2018
Because there wasn't an attack, those police let them into the building. Stay tuned into your left wing media bro, you'll never learn if you do.
You're saying you didn't see the video of MAGA demonstrators battling Capitol police within the capitol building. Seriously? Police in riot gear being punched, kicked, bludgeoned, crushed? Really? Let me guess, you didn't bother watching any of the Congressional hearings on the Jan. 6 attack because you only watch FOX and other like-minded right-wing propaganda media.
How about we just both agree to live in are own two worlds -- me here on earth and you on Bizarro world.
originally posted by: JohnTitorSociety
You are welcome to your fantasies.
a reply to: MrInquisitive
originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: MrInquisitive
Cool story bro
originally posted by: sarahvital
originally posted by: MrInquisitive
originally posted by: LSU2018
Because there wasn't an attack, those police let them into the building. Stay tuned into your left wing media bro, you'll never learn if you do.
You're saying you didn't see the video of MAGA demonstrators battling Capitol police within the capitol building. Seriously? Police in riot gear being punched, kicked, bludgeoned, crushed? Really? Let me guess, you didn't bother watching any of the Congressional hearings on the Jan. 6 attack because you only watch FOX and other like-minded right-wing propaganda media.
How about we just both agree to live in are own two worlds -- me here on earth and you on Bizarro world.
i think you are talking about the
tenn capital after the nashville shooting.
btw, how's biden working out for ya?
the phone call is coming from inside the house now.
Advocates of the long-shot bid to turn the Electoral College against Donald Trump have been in contact with close allies of Hillary Clinton, according to multiple sources familiar with the discussions, but the Clinton camp — and Clinton herself — have declined to weigh in on the merits of the plan.
Clinton’s team and the Democratic National Committee have steadfastly refused to endorse the efforts spearheaded by a group of electors in Colorado and Washington state. But, as with the ongoing recounts initiated by Green Party nominee Jill Stein, the Clinton team has not categorically rejected them, leaving the collection of mainly Democratic electors to push forward with no explicit public support from the failed Democratic nominee or any other prominent party leaders.
link