It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ElGoobero
not to drift topic but there's a theory that China suffers climate catastrophe every 200 years or so. floods, famine, upheaval, resulting in a new dynasty.
I suspect there is some cycle to global climate. TPTB are freaking about possible global warming but its the cooling that worries me. In the last Ice Age, much of North America was covered in ice.
can we imagine the US government trying to buy living space from southern climes in this event? more likely the rich would pack up and leave the rest of us to freeze.
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: JohnTitorSociety
We could hypothesize other insane exigent events
Well, why dont we do that. This isn't rocket science, or brain surgery.
We see, and if you have forgotten, Science must start with the observation, unusual marks on the ocean beds, 3 in all.
The first is between Antarctica and South America. Because it crosses 6 time zones it could be assumed the event took at least that long. To the right side of this "skid mark" is a semi circular mound of dirt and mud as one might expect to see if one pushes a basket ball through the mud and stop. Today, we call this pile of mud, the Sandwich Island chain. Now if our planet was rotating and a somewhat large basket ball was dragged through the area it too would leave a semi circular mound of mud. Another thing that can be deduced is that when the planet was brought to a stop it was rotating, with a western rising sun. When it was restarted the rotation was reversed where the sun now comes up, in the east. The diameter of the contact area of that basket ball was approx 300 miles.
The results on the surface of the planet would be catastrophic, especially on the coast lines. The water in the ocean beds would over wash the continents lead by a massive wave, of mud, that would eventually settle onto any "works" burying them, depending on location. Depending on the heights of the waves would determine the amount of life that could live, especially on mountain tops (Or if your lucky enough to have someone warn you, to build a boat) .
The winds would also pickup to unbelievable speeds, causing even more damage. Earthquakes around the globe. And all of this is recorded as observations during the great flood from cultures around the world.
The Second set of "Skid Marks" is in the Pacific. The Push of mud in a semi circular shape are the Mariana's Island chain and begin off the coast of Japan. These appear to have been created in the same timeline, 3 in all. the first to the right slowed the rotation of the planet somewhat as it left the telltale island chain. The middle "Skid", which also left its own semicircle mud pattern was less pronounced, but still slowing the planet. The third "skid" has virtually no mud buildup to the right indication the planet had stopped rotating altogether, or ever so slightly. These "Skid" do appear to be layed over previous, older skid marks and almost unidentifiable, and only hints they are there.
These Skid Marks run north to south and align through a line through the centers of Magnetic and Political North poles. I would summarize this was the setting of our seasons. As it appears the planet originally rotated around the Magnetic North pole. Since these Marks drag to the south, it also dragged the Magnetic Pole south. If the Magnetic North pole was our True North, there would be no seasons, and, no Ice Caps, as these areas would receive day night cycles that would be the coolest on the planet, but not cold enough to form the caps.. The extra water that would enter the oceans is covered by another process I wont get into here.
The 3rd and most ancient, and barley noticeable are around the Hawaiian Island Chain. Running North South is the faintest tale tell spoon shaped line of raised mud to the right. This one appears to come from the time when the planet was smaller as their is less contact area. There is a faint wash area now completely dissolved, but still noticeable to the left. The planet was also rotating with a Rising sun in the west.
There is also a suspected area beween Puerto Rico and South America. These to appear to be quite ancient and multiple Skid Marks, on on top of the other. But are so old the original shapes have been warped of water pressure and time.
The suspected "Basket Ball" that did this itself has 300 mile diameter circles on it, where the water washed off the cover dust, leaving dark circular areas, and, water residue. Then, the Pre Flood moon religion might make a bit more sense for folks.
Now for the really odd part. All the marks I have found show the planet rotating with a West rising sun when it is stopped. Where are the East Rising Sun, marks??? I see none. Why? Is the West Rising Sun our Natural rotational direction? And East, a counterfeit? ???
Anyways, its just not Rocket Science.
The implication is, in time, the Planet will start to slow down, stop, and reverse rotational direction, on its own. It may also try to go back to the original angle, if, nothing like the moon is holding it, in a unnatural angle. If the Planet does this self rotaion, its going to be one long hot spell for some folks, and awfully cold, for others......
Oh, Shiiiiiiiiiiiiiii..........
The length of Earth’s days has been mysteriously increasing, and scientists don’t know why
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: JohnTitorSociety
We see, and if you have forgotten, Science must start with the observation, unusual marks on the ocean beds, 3 in all.
The first is between Antarctica and South America. Because it crosses 6 time zones it could be assumed the event took at least that long.
To the right side of this "skid mark" is a semi circular mound of dirt and mud as one might expect to see if one pushes a basket ball through the mud and stop.
Today, we call this pile of mud, the Sandwich Island chain.
Now if our planet was rotating and a somewhat large basket ball was dragged through the area it too would leave a semi circular mound of mud.
I already explained it simply. Elaborating on the simply, basic explanation is not complexity it is context,
The word that Mrs. Bronson is unable to put into the hot, still, sodden air is 'doomed,' because the people you've just seen have been handed a death sentence. One month ago, the Earth suddenly changed its elliptical orbit and in doing so began to follow a path which gradually, moment by moment, day by day, took it closer to the sun. And all of man's little devices to stir up the air are now no longer luxuries—they happen to be pitiful and panicky keys to survival. The time is five minutes to twelve, midnight. There is no more darkness. The place is New York City and this is the eve of the end, because even at midnight it's high noon, the hottest day in history, and you're about to spend it in the Twilight Zone.
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: Byrd
The initial key to interpreting myths of the western rising sun is the myth of the blinding of Horus the Elder by Seth.[1] In this myth, the sun jumps to the other (yonder) side of the Milky Way (Winding Waterway) which is in what the Egyptians call the Eastern Sky, home of Sothis (Sirius). The first significant geo-magnetic event of this time period was the 180° event of 12,100 BCE, which corresponds to the latter part of the First Age of Man, and the reign of Horus the Elder. This myth puts the sun rise in the region of Orion and the Pleiades, which means that prior to the battle with Seth, it was rising in the West.
In the annals of Egyptian funerary artifacts, Senmut’s tomb has received inordinate attention, focused primarily on the direction and sequence of two figures (Sothis/Sirius and Orion.) These figures appear to have been presented on the ceiling so that “Orion appears west of Sirius instead of east. ‘The orientating of the southern panel is such that a person in the tomb looking at it has to lift his head and face north, not south.’
Einstein was a genius, but this quote is demonstrably not true. If the listener doesn't have a background in a topic, then there's a lot of things that can't be explained to the listener.
In every case, Einstein, was correct...
In any case, Einstein was wrong.