Could this be what happens to earth to reset it every 5000 years

If you watched the entire video, the narrator says that the Earth will not flip because its rotation is stably rotating around its maximum moment of inertia. Sorry no doom scenario.

originally posted by: godservant
youtu.be...

If this video shows what the earth does repeatedly, it could explain what happens if the oceans continue to travel 1000 miles per hour in the direction they were already going. Maybe a day the sun stood still, or even set in the east one day?

The big year is a 24k year cylce. The movement through the zodiacal clock. This is the big year.. The season of man.

I have researched, studied this subject in the past, and my conclusion is as follows.

We only know of Magnetic reversal by studying the beds of the oceans. A good and simple view of the phenomenon can be seen in the Atlantic ocean bed spread. The central rift is a great keeper of records concerning the age of the bed, and, its polarity during its molten stage. As the molten lava is excreted out the magnetic direction is recorded in the lava itself. As a result we have age of the lava, and the direction north is recorded. It also records how long north lasts during that period. The bands are of differing lengths of time, and are not standard. So that means, there is no standard it follows, and the flip can not be predicted.

Now when you actually dig into the age of the Atlantic you find it is only 70 million years old. Give or take. This becomes political from this point. There are only 3 areas of water that are older, much older than this, going back hundreds of millions of years. But these older area's do not display any rifting so no real magnetic data can be extrapolated from them. So in honesty we only have evidence this pole reversal for the last 70 mil. There just isn't any evidence to support it going further back.

The width of these "Bands" are unique and do not follow any timeline. Sometimes they are narrow, sometimes wide. Hundred of thousands of years, to millions. So what ever triggers these reversals does not follow the clock. The trigger must be found elsewhere.

For the missing trigger we can only guess. But, I have my suspicions as to what it is. And it is highly politically incorrect! And it has nothing to do with the planet flipping, upside down...

The last "Reset" actually happened around 5500bc, and is known as "The Great Flood" My opinion!

Even if enough mass could move rapidly enough to cause the entire planet to pitch 180 degrees, no one would survive an event for more than nanoseconds to milliseconds, as tidal force changes would instantly pulverize most of your body, the atmosphere would also likely immediately burn off, all sorts of absurd things would happen. The speed of the Earth’s rotation would change so rapidly that anything above the mantle would probably be thrown into space (perhaps a couple of seconds after everything dies).

The ocean & crust lacks sufficient mass to even come close to causing such an event.

An exigent large shift in the mantle would be rapidly dampened by the laws of thermodynamics, as well as Earth’s spin and orbit — absent some external kinetic event (such as something the size of the moon impacting the planet or a rogue star flying through the solar system) such an event is likely entirely impossible. A rogue star that could cause such an event would be identified millions of years before such an event would occur.

Magnetic pole shifts? Yes.

Earth jackknifing would require an external force already sufficient to kill everything on the planet.

The energy involved is nearly inconceivable on human timelines.

The Earth has a moment of inertia, I = 8.04×10^37 kg·m2. Therefore, it has a rotational kinetic energy of 2.14×10^29 J. The angular momentum is larger. The kinetic energy alone of the Earth due to its yearly rotation about the Sun is 2.67 × 10^33 J

Total energy output of humans per year is 3.14 × 10^19 J

In relative terms, it would take something around 10-100 quadrillion years of human energy output to merely match just the orbital kinetic energy of the Earth.

So absent rogue star or black hole, there is no known conceivable event that could even stop the Earth in orbit before a timeframe that approached lower limits for the heat death of the universe.





a reply to: godservant

a reply to: JohnTitorSociety

You are correct. A instantaneous reversal would destroy the globe. Whether it be 180 Deg, or, reversal of it rotational direction. It would have to be slowed down before such a event would occur. At minimum it would require at least, 6 hours..

Find an extra 100 quadrillion+ years of energy without an external kinetic event.

There is not enough energy inside the Earth itself to cause this (mantle/core/everything).

You’d still be many many many orders of magnitude short (an understatement).

And the slower you do it, the more energy you need, as the energy starts to radiate away.

Plus, regardless of how it’s theorized, it would be so much energy that everything would still instantly die.

a reply to: All Seeing Eye

a reply to: JohnTitorSociety

Find an extra 100 quadrillion+ years of energy without an external kinetic event.

There is not enough energy inside the Earth itself to cause this (mantle/core/everything).

Yes, I agree. So we look to the outside for that "external Kinetic Energy, event"

And what do we see? The basis of ancient Moon Worship. Take it, or leave it. It matters not to me.

If the moon was at the Roche limit, many things would happen and most of them would kill everything on the planet one way or another.

For starters, ELE tidal waves would continuously sweep around the planet.

The magnetic field would warp and the Sun would kill a ton more people instantly.

If anyone somehow lasted long enough, they would die of strokes, blood clots, cardiac arrests and other cardio-pulmonary events during the 1st orbit, if somehow someone survived more than a single orbit the repeat of extreme gravitational & tidal force sweeps would finish everyone off as their hearts failed, blood was drained from brain and so on.

Every super volcano on the planet would erupt in a short period of time.

If the moon didn’t immediately begin to drift away - causing more havoc one way, which no one left would survive (there wouldn’t be anyone left), it would potentially dip below the Roche limit near the equator and break into pieces, that again, no one would survive.

If the moon did drift away, while everything on the planet was dead, it would fundamentally alter the composition of the atmosphere and magnetic field as it spins away at a relatively high speed for the first ~10000 - 20000 miles of travel — making any mantle/core deformations possibly short lived, possibly permanent.

This could alter the rotation, orbit, etc. of the planet but everything would be dead and the planet likely permanently uninhabitable for myriad reasons.

Either scenario might also cause the atmosphere to ignite.

Anything meaningfully beyond the Roche limit such that anything alive on the planet might survive, wouldn’t have strong enough effects to permanently alter the planet’s axis, rotation or orbit.

a reply to: All Seeing Eye

a reply to: JohnTitorSociety

Bra ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha rothflmao ha hahaaah Oh my ha haha ha te te ha ha ha ha...............


Chocking now ha hah ah

Blew a lung out lol

Oooohhyyyyyy

That is the most divinely inspired imagination I have ever seen lol oh no, here it comes again lol ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaa

YOur good lol

WE ALL DIE lol lol lol

Now my ribs hurt.

Thanks I need that, seriously.

On the other hand, if the execution of the maneuver is not done is a very gentile manner, it actually could destroy a planet, and everything dies. Example: Asteroid Belt......


Thanks for the reply lol
(18323)

The fundamentals are all about proximity and velocity, from a purely scientific POV.

Any event fast enough and with sufficient proximity for humans currently alive to observe it, would indisputably kill every living thing on the planet.

Any event that didn’t cause an ELE would occur so slowly it would not be observable except on extraordinarily long timelines that would likely exceed the historical existence of humans.

a reply to: All Seeing Eye

originally posted by: JohnTitorSociety
The fundamentals are all about proximity and velocity, from a purely scientific POV.

Any event fast enough and with sufficient proximity for humans currently alive to observe it, would indisputably kill every living thing on the planet.

Any event that didn’t cause an ELE would occur so slowly it would not be observable except on extraordinarily long timelines that would likely exceed the historical existence of humans.

a reply to: All Seeing Eye

exceed the historical existence of humans

I have to agree with that, but the evidence will always be there...

This little skid mark goes across 6 time zones. So, from touchdown to full stop, 6 hrs, give or take. Not everything dies...

The effects would be even less dramatic for areas, deeper, in the orb... errr, planet

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
Righti O. For sure. The moon is, locked to the core of our planet, because obviously it moves independently of the crust. And that would mean the crust is free of the core. And it seems, our core is also locked to our solar sun, not, the crust.

So it would seem very possible our crust actually levitates from the core, doing in essence a balancing act.

No. The crust isn't levitating.

Do you see my finger print?

Oh, sorry, wrong photo. This one..

Only if you're spinning the globe in the wrong direction.

What you're seeing is the Scotia Plate that formed around 60 million years ago as the Atlantic opened up and South America drifted away from Antarctica. It's moving along at the incredible rate of about 1inch per year.

There's a number of papers on this (and the salt domes and slippage) but frankly they're Hard Geology and rather eyeball bending. I can link them if anyone's desperate to read them, but the conclusions are well supported by drill cores.

Finger indentation isn't supported by drill cores.

originally posted by: JohnTitorSociety
The fundamentals are all about proximity and velocity, from a purely scientific POV.

Any event fast enough and with sufficient proximity for humans currently alive to observe it, would indisputably kill every living thing on the planet.

Any event that didn’t cause an ELE would occur so slowly it would not be observable except on extraordinarily long timelines that would likely exceed the historical existence of humans.

a reply to: All Seeing Eye

Just to add to JohnTitorSociety's excellent replies - this data is recorded in rock layers and sediment layers. We don't see anything like what you propose (and if what you proposed DID happen, none of us would be here to see it).

a reply to: Byrd

ITS ALL MYTH!!! LOL WE ALL DIE!!! LOL LOL

Karnak, Temple of the Western-Rising Sun

Sometimes we just need to listen carefully. Definitely in regard to Karnak.

Egyptian priests told Herodotus, a careful listener, that four times since Egypt had become a kingdom “the Sun rose contrary to his wont; twice he rose where he now sets, and twice he set where he now rises.”

Theory of the Reversing Earth


There are good reasons to think that Earth has turned over on various occasions. But who can be surprised that this notion—so removed from everyday experience—seems less than instantaneously persuasive?

The good reasons include telling evidence in narrative testimony and correctly interpreted myths of the ancients, embedded patterns in ancient cultures that give evidence of inversions, and the insights and arguments of two formidable researchers. Now we can 1) add new reasons that strengthen the case; 2) specify the approximate dates of four inversions; 3) comprehend that Earth is actually prone to inversion; and 4) point to where to find more evidence. Understanding inversions helps us correct errors in interpreting past planetary and Earth science, and it may provide clues relevant to climate change.

(18379)

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: Byrd

ITS ALL MYTH!!! LOL WE ALL DIE!!! LOL LOL

Karnak, Temple of the Western-Rising Sun

I would agree that the statements on that website are hilarious -- particularly the ones about the sun rising in the west. The writer clearly never learned that the Babylonians (far better astronomers than the Egyptians) and the Chinese (ditto) had been making astronomical charts and records since their beginnings... and somehow they and other civilizations during this time period totally never noticed that the sun suddenly was rising in the west.

They managed to record comets, though. And eclipses. And a nova.

But not the sun rising in the west.

Come to think of it, none of the astronomical tables and observations of the ancient Egyptians (which are written down) show the sun rising in the west.

a reply to: Byrd

You have the tongue of a Serpent

First Age of Man

The initial key to interpreting myths of the western rising sun is the myth of the blinding of Horus the Elder by Seth.[1] In this myth, the sun jumps to the other (yonder) side of the Milky Way (Winding Waterway) which is in what the Egyptians call the Eastern Sky, home of Sothis (Sirius). The first significant geo-magnetic event of this time period was the 180° event of 12,100 BCE, which corresponds to the latter part of the First Age of Man, and the reign of Horus the Elder. This myth puts the sun rise in the region of Orion and the Pleiades, which means that prior to the battle with Seth, it was rising in the West.

Prior to this, the sun was rising in the West, which should not be surprising. As noted earlier, four ancient historians of Greece documented the western sun rise as well. Sophocles, in his play Atreus wrote “…Zeus wrought a fresh portent: he changed the course of the sun, causing it to rise in the east, and not (as it was said to have done previously) in the west. …Sophocles and Euripides both related the story in substantially the same for as that in which it is given by Apollodorus.

In the annals of Egyptian funerary artifacts, Senmut’s tomb has received inordinate attention, focused primarily on the direction and sequence of two figures (Sothis/Sirius and Orion.) These figures appear to have been presented on the ceiling so that “Orion appears west of Sirius instead of east. ‘The orientating of the southern panel is such that a person in the tomb looking at it has to lift his head and face north, not south.’ ‘With the reversed orientation of the south panel, Orion, the most conspicuous constellation of the southern sky, appeared to be moving eastward, i.e., in the wrong direction.”[1] A number of scholars have tried to dismiss the curiosity as being scribal error, but two observations make it clear that the orientation is not attributable to error. First, there are a number of obvious changes or adjustments to the ceiling art, indicating that the ceiling art had been corrected without addressing the reversed orientation issue, and second, there are numerous additional items on the ceiling that support the key message of a reversed orientation. The astronomical chart on the ceiling of Senmut’s (Senemut) tomb is a critical component of the Egyptian record of changes to the location of the sunrise, be it in the east or west. The ceiling was created circa 1,473 BCE, some 1,200 years before Plato and Crantor reported the Egyptians recorded that the sun had risen in the west on two occasions. Senmut’s ceiling reinforces that ancient knowledge, as might be expected.

In a computer model of Earth’s evolving climate, Ziemen and his colleagues reversed a few key physical processes that are the result of Earth’s actual rotational direction, called prograde rotation. It was as simple as that to create a “retrograde rotating Earth,” which they watched develop as the model’s virtual calendar ticked off 7,000 years.

The computer simulation revealed a backward spinning planet with a dramatically different distribution and abundance of desert lands, an otherworldly surge of cyanobacteria, and rerouted ocean currents, among other differences from our real, familiar planet. The findings were presented Monday at the annual General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union (EGU) in Vienna, Austria.


Some people are so "Hell" bent on keeping their eyes closed, and believing, lies. Must be some type of Psychological syndrome. Seems we all have one. Just not the same ones. I spoke with a Narcissist once. When I reported the observed truth, he just walked away. He didn't want to hear it, I guess. Making their own little realities...... Matrix of lies..........

a reply to: Byrd

NO, You amuse me.

No. The crust isn't levitating.

And your original observation of your original theory is.......

You have seen the core of this planet? You have seen the molten lava? Your theory is based on what? If there is no observation, there is no science!

"Everyone knows" this or that? Everyone has been programmed to know this or that, just the way they were taught, without open debate. Without, question!

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: Byrd

You have the tongue of a Serpent

First Age of Man

The initial key to interpreting myths of the western rising sun is the myth of the blinding of Horus the Elder by Seth.[1] In this myth, the sun jumps to the other (yonder) side of the Milky Way (Winding Waterway) which is in what the Egyptians call the Eastern Sky, home of Sothis (Sirius). The first significant geo-magnetic event of this time period was the 180° event of 12,100 BCE, which corresponds to the latter part of the First Age of Man, and the reign of Horus the Elder. This myth puts the sun rise in the region of Orion and the Pleiades, which means that prior to the battle with Seth, it was rising in the West.

Prior to this, the sun was rising in the West, which should not be surprising. As noted earlier, four ancient historians of Greece documented the western sun rise as well. Sophocles, in his play Atreus wrote “…Zeus wrought a fresh portent: he changed the course of the sun, causing it to rise in the east, and not (as it was said to have done previously) in the west. …Sophocles and Euripides both related the story in substantially the same for as that in which it is given by Apollodorus.

In the annals of Egyptian funerary artifacts, Senmut’s tomb has received inordinate attention, focused primarily on the direction and sequence of two figures (Sothis/Sirius and Orion.) These figures appear to have been presented on the ceiling so that “Orion appears west of Sirius instead of east. ‘The orientating of the southern panel is such that a person in the tomb looking at it has to lift his head and face north, not south.’ ‘With the reversed orientation of the south panel, Orion, the most conspicuous constellation of the southern sky, appeared to be moving eastward, i.e., in the wrong direction.”[1] A number of scholars have tried to dismiss the curiosity as being scribal error, but two observations make it clear that the orientation is not attributable to error. First, there are a number of obvious changes or adjustments to the ceiling art, indicating that the ceiling art had been corrected without addressing the reversed orientation issue, and second, there are numerous additional items on the ceiling that support the key message of a reversed orientation. The astronomical chart on the ceiling of Senmut’s (Senemut) tomb is a critical component of the Egyptian record of changes to the location of the sunrise, be it in the east or west. The ceiling was created circa 1,473 BCE, some 1,200 years before Plato and Crantor reported the Egyptians recorded that the sun had risen in the west on two occasions. Senmut’s ceiling reinforces that ancient knowledge, as might be expected.

In a computer model of Earth’s evolving climate, Ziemen and his colleagues reversed a few key physical processes that are the result of Earth’s actual rotational direction, called prograde rotation. It was as simple as that to create a “retrograde rotating Earth,” which they watched develop as the model’s virtual calendar ticked off 7,000 years.

The computer simulation revealed a backward spinning planet with a dramatically different distribution and abundance of desert lands, an otherworldly surge of cyanobacteria, and rerouted ocean currents, among other differences from our real, familiar planet. The findings were presented Monday at the annual General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union (EGU) in Vienna, Austria.


Some people are so "Hell" bent on keeping their eyes closed, and believing, lies. Must be some type of Psychological syndrome. Seems we all have one. Just not the same ones. I spoke with a Narcissist once. When I reported the observed truth, he just walked away. He didn't want to hear it, I guess. Making their own little realities...... Matrix of lies..........

It doesn’t matter how slowly you run this event, nor if you use Newtonian or Quantum Physics as your praxis.

Any event involving the alteration of Earth’s inertia and kinetic energy would either occur so slowly that humans could never observe it OR would occur on a timeline to would extinguish all life

Run the numbers — there is no “middle ground.”

And any inversion, axial flip, rotational reverse or deviant orbital event requires TWO things:

1) First enough energy would be expended to halt the current 4-dimensional movement of the planet;
2) Second enough energy would be expended to reverse the Earth from inertial stasis to the opposite of its state prior to #1.

Unless both events occurred on time horizons longer than human existence BOTH events, no matter how slow, would each involve enough kinetic energy to kill every living thing on the planet. IE both required events (stopping and restarting) would either have to be so slow humans cannot observe it — or BOTH events would involve so much kinetic energy on such a short time line that it would be an ELE for everything living thing on the planet; from living flora and fauna on the crust to single cell amoebas in the deepest reaches of the ocean (which on a non billion year timeline would all die along with humans as the oceans boiled off in such an event).

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye

originally posted by: JohnTitorSociety
The fundamentals are all about proximity and velocity, from a purely scientific POV.

Any event fast enough and with sufficient proximity for humans currently alive to observe it, would indisputably kill every living thing on the planet.

Any event that didn’t cause an ELE would occur so slowly it would not be observable except on extraordinarily long timelines that would likely exceed the historical existence of humans.

a reply to: All Seeing Eye

exceed the historical existence of humans

I have to agree with that, but the evidence will always be there...

This little skid mark goes across 6 time zones. So, from touchdown to full stop, 6 hrs, give or take. Not everything dies...

The effects would be even less dramatic for areas, deeper, in the orb... errr, planet

To put the energetics in context.

The entire planet lacks the energy to stop itself or invert its axial plane if you add all energy of the planet from core to troposphere.

You would need to cause a continuous fusion reaction to Earth’s core, consuming all mass, to merely invert the planet’s axis (which would be irrelevant because the planet would no longer exist).

Alternatively, you would need to impact the Earth with another intrasolar body, direct impact, from Mercury and Mars to Venus to the moon itself — at the right vector you could invert the axis or stop Earth’s rotation or even deflect its orbital trajectory. But again, such an event would leave you with no Earth (or at least something unrecognizable as Earth and nothing alive to record the event).

Alternatively, you could fire a Jupiter+ or solar sized mass (including a black hole or a brown dwarf or a massive star) through the solar system on a vector with Earth at an absurd speed, that could possibly, without impact but nearly incomprehensible velocity, kinetic energy, gravitational force and tidal force, that could, for example invert Earth — again every living thing would die and Earth would likely be ping ponged either so close or far from the sun that, while everything would die — nothing could ever live again on the planet (if the vector is off by 1% Earth would fly out of the solar system into intergalactic space. Also a non-recordable event.

You could also formulate an event where the solar system rapidly intersected with another star system during a galactic plane traversal or some other insane galactic event — again, everything would die and in this case not just the Earth but probably the entire solar system would be disentangled and scatter into space or become a whirling mass of debris around the intersecting intra galactic mass.

We could hypothesize other insane exigent events — but in any situation where the exigent event is human observable — everything dies — the energy involved is essentially incomprehensible outside of math, and most scenarios that occurred fast enough to be theoretically observable would involve the degradation of the solar stasis to an extreme degree or the complete obliteration of the Earth’s orbital partners.

a reply to: JohnTitorSociety

We could hypothesize other insane exigent events

Well, why dont we do that. This isn't rocket science, or brain surgery.


We see, and if you have forgotten, Science must start with the observation, unusual marks on the ocean beds, 3 in all.

The first is between Antarctica and South America. Because it crosses 6 time zones it could be assumed the event took at least that long. To the right side of this "skid mark" is a semi circular mound of dirt and mud as one might expect to see if one pushes a basket ball through the mud and stop. Today, we call this pile of mud, the Sandwich Island chain. Now if our planet was rotating and a somewhat large basket ball was dragged through the area it too would leave a semi circular mound of mud. Another thing that can be deduced is that when the planet was brought to a stop it was rotating, with a western rising sun. When it was restarted the rotation was reversed where the sun now comes up, in the east. The diameter of the contact area of that basket ball was approx 300 miles.

The results on the surface of the planet would be catastrophic, especially on the coast lines. The water in the ocean beds would over wash the continents lead by a massive wave, of mud, that would eventually settle onto any "works" burying them, depending on location. Depending on the heights of the waves would determine the amount of life that could live, especially on mountain tops (Or if your lucky enough to have someone warn you, to build a boat) .

The winds would also pickup to unbelievable speeds, causing even more damage. Earthquakes around the globe. And all of this is recorded as observations during the great flood from cultures around the world.



The Second set of "Skid Marks" is in the Pacific. The Push of mud in a semi circular shape are the Mariana's Island chain and begin off the coast of Japan. These appear to have been created in the same timeline, 3 in all. the first to the right slowed the rotation of the planet somewhat as it left the telltale island chain. The middle "Skid", which also left its own semicircle mud pattern was less pronounced, but still slowing the planet. The third "skid" has virtually no mud buildup to the right indication the planet had stopped rotating altogether, or ever so slightly. These "Skid" do appear to be layed over previous, older skid marks and almost unidentifiable, and only hints they are there.

These Skid Marks run north to south and align through a line through the centers of Magnetic and Political North poles. I would summarize this was the setting of our seasons. As it appears the planet originally rotated around the Magnetic North pole. Since these Marks drag to the south, it also dragged the Magnetic Pole south. If the Magnetic North pole was our True North, there would be no seasons, and, no Ice Caps, as these areas would receive day night cycles that would be the coolest on the planet, but not cold enough to form the caps.. The extra water that would enter the oceans is covered by another process I wont get into here.




The 3rd and most ancient, and barley noticeable are around the Hawaiian Island Chain. Running North South is the faintest tale tell spoon shaped line of raised mud to the right. This one appears to come from the time when the planet was smaller as their is less contact area. There is a faint wash area now completely dissolved, but still noticeable to the left. The planet was also rotating with a Rising sun in the west.

There is also a suspected area beween Puerto Rico and South America. These to appear to be quite ancient and multiple Skid Marks, on on top of the other. But are so old the original shapes have been warped of water pressure and time.



The suspected "Basket Ball" that did this itself has 300 mile diameter circles on it, where the water washed off the cover dust, leaving dark circular areas, and, water residue. Then, the Pre Flood moon religion might make a bit more sense for folks.



Now for the really odd part. All the marks I have found show the planet rotating with a West rising sun when it is stopped. Where are the East Rising Sun, marks??? I see none. Why? Is the West Rising Sun our Natural rotational direction? And East, a counterfeit? ???

Anyways, its just not Rocket Science.

The implication is, in time, the Planet will start to slow down, stop, and reverse rotational direction, on its own. It may also try to go back to the original angle, if, nothing like the moon is holding it, in a unnatural angle. If the Planet does this self rotaion, its going to be one long hot spell for some folks, and awfully cold, for others......



Oh, Shiiiiiiiiiiiiiii..........

The length of Earth’s days has been mysteriously increasing, and scientists don’t know why