Could this be what happens to earth to reset it every 5000 years

youtu.be...

If this video shows what the earth does repeatedly, it could explain what happens if the oceans continue to travel 1000 miles per hour in the direction they were already going. Maybe a day the sun stood still, or even set in the east one day?

a reply to: godservant

Your video is on 'space DRUMS' -whatever that is.

a reply to: nugget1

I mess this up a lot.
I see the right video when I click it.

originally posted by: godservant
a reply to: nugget1

I mess this up a lot.
I see the right video when I click it.

This is what your link takes me to:


Maybe just post the whole address without putting it in the Youtube link?

a reply to: godservant

I have seen a similar video useing a regular wingnut.


Found it. This one has an explanation.



Interesting theory when applied to a planetary scale.

The video also explains why planets don't flip.

a reply to: godservant

I get it. And I'm sure the video is the right one.

Interesting connection, thankyou.

It's hard to understand how this could relate unless we had some kind of physics model to rely on that helps us understand the rotation and movement of our planet. There's all sorts of "wobbles" going on out there and I'm pretty sure we have one too.

Maybe there's a secret in a Honey Bee's "waggle dance" and the plane of our waggle shows a directional indicator through space?

Crazy big stuff eh?

originally posted by: godservant
youtu.be...

If this video shows what the earth does repeatedly, it could explain what happens if the oceans continue to travel 1000 miles per hour in the direction they were already going. Maybe a day the sun stood still, or even set in the east one day?

So if this is your train of thought concerning the magnetic reversal, I can see it. But..

What is the moon doing during all this? Obviously it would too be effected in some manner, way. What do you see it doing?

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye

originally posted by: godservant
youtu.be...

If this video shows what the earth does repeatedly, it could explain what happens if the oceans continue to travel 1000 miles per hour in the direction they were already going. Maybe a day the sun stood still, or even set in the east one day?

So if this is your train of thought concerning the magnetic reversal, I can see it. But..

What is the moon doing during all this? Obviously it would too be effected in some manner, way. What do you see it doing?

Maybe the moon was loose on earth as rubble. The flip happened, rubble ejected, collided and moon formed.

a reply to: godservant

the Why Files delved into this one:
Why Files: CIA Classified Book about the Pole Shift

EDIT: sorry, that's the wrong Why Files... I was wrong.
some fringe site led me to the video you posted, but I'm am having trouble finding it.
End-EDIT

a reply to: All Seeing Eye

The moon would most likely not be affected. The Earth would flip its physical (not magnetic) North & South Poles, but continue to rotate around its original center of mass. The Moon would continue to revolve around the Earth's unchanged center of mass, taking no notice that the Earth's orientation had flipped.

Again to stress, this has nothing to do with the Earth's Magnetic Field (which is known to flip from time to time), and everything to do with a Flip of the Earth's Physical Poles (ie; Antarctica would end up pointing at the North Star (Polaris)).

From what I've seen on this topic: this event is extremely unlikely, because so much of the Earth's mass is already distributed around the Equator. The Earth is an Oblate Spheroid: the Equatorial Diameter is larger than the Polar Diameter, hence a lot more mass exists around the equator.

The only conceivable way that this event could hypothetically happen, were if a LOT of mass decided to move to the Poles -- Polar Ice Sheets would have to grow IMMENSELY. I haven't seen anyone run the numbers, but a big question would be if there were even enough water in the oceans, that if suddenly moved to the poles and frozen, could cause this Real Physics Effect to happen to the Earth. The Earth's radii are 3,963 miles equatorial, and 3,950 miles polar. The average depth of Ocean is 2 miles (assume the Trenches contribute an insignificant volume to the total), but only covers 70% of the surface.

Take average radius: (3963 + 3950) / 2 = 3956.5 miles
Volume of Earth = (4/3) * pi * (3956.5)^3 = 259431149226.5 = 259*10^9 cubic-miles
Surface of Earth = 4 * pi * (3956.5)^2 = 196712611.5 square-miles = 196*10^6 square-miles
Volume of Ocean = (Surface of Earth) * (depth=2 miles) * (70%) = 275397656.2 = 275*10^6 cubic-miles

Specific Gravities:
water = 1.0
stone ~ 1.25 - 2.5 ?
iron = 7.8

So the total volume of the Oceans is about 1/1000th that of the Earth.
Water weighs a lot less than either the rocky crust, or the nickel-iron core of the earth, so the Oceans will have less than 1/1000th total mass by the extra divisor of between 1.25-7.8.

If that 1/1000th of easily moveable mass were suddenly transported to the poles and frozen in place, is that enough to over-balance the "extra" mass that is already at the equator (the equatorial bulge)?

I'm going to hope not, because I don't feel like being run over by a 1000-foot-high wall of water moving at 1000 miles-per-hour.

But our world is tectonically active, and the interior is always moving & squooshing around... all those crustal pieces that subduct under the Andes and Himalayas still exist as "crustal" material down in the mantle, still moving slowly. Crust weighs a lot less than either mantle or core... so the distribution of inhomogeneous mass is not "fixed in stone" (pun intended).

If anything like that happened all advanced life on Earth would be wiped out. It'd take millions of years to recover. And we most certainly wouldn't be here to find there is absolutely no physical evidence it ever happened!

a reply to: trombleforth

with no disrespect intended but..........

" But our world is tectonically active, and the interior is always moving & squooshing around... all those crustal pieces that subduct under the Andes and Himalayas still exist as "crustal" material down in the mantle, still moving slowly. Crust weighs a lot less than either mantle or core... so the distribution of inhomogeneous mass is not "fixed in stone" (pun intended)."

isn't your above statement merely theory & 'modelling' results as we humans have only drilled down a tiny percentage of distance to Earth's crust ?

a reply to: godservant

Mea culpa, godservant; I didn't understand the connection of the headline to the video; my brain doesn't seem to be firing on all cylinders. lol

Thanks to all of the great responses you got I can now grasp the concept a bit better.

At least I got the video to play in the thread, eh?

a reply to: nugget1

It's all good. I have a habit of not elaborating enough.

I love coming here to ask such questions because over the years, I've found ATS to have the most intelligent folks on the web.

And again I'm not disappointed. Might even explain the flood(s) of the past.

a reply to: godservant

Nope.

The Earth doesn't "reset" every 5,000 years.

Back then, 5,000 years ago, the Babylonians were obsessively recording the skies (and wrote down what they observed.) There's no sudden or even gradual switch of them noting southern sky constellations before that time and no change afterward.

And as was pointed out, the Earth's mass is located around the equator

The Moon is tidally locked to the Earth core, I believe. It should not be affected by a slippage of the crust, if that indeed does occur. It seems like science itself, is unsure.

originally posted by: AndyMayhew
If anything like that happened all advanced life on Earth would be wiped out. It'd take millions of years to recover. And we most certainly wouldn't be here to find there is absolutely no physical evidence it ever happened!

Yep, little to nothing would have remained. Except for, oh, I dont know, buried structures? Discoveries made in Coal Veins?

Yes, I agree, millions of years to recover. I can see that

originally posted by: charlyv
The Moon is tidally locked to the Earth core, I believe. It should not be affected by a slippage of the crust, if that indeed does occur. It seems like science itself, is unsure.

Righti O. For sure. The moon is, locked to the core of our planet, because obviously it moves independently of the crust. And that would mean the crust is free of the core. And it seems, our core is also locked to our solar sun, not, the crust.

So it would seem very possible our crust actually levitates from the core, doing in essence a balancing act. So if the core actually isnt in direct contact with the crust, then the crust is free to move in any direction it were encouraged to move.

I have one of those mag lev globes that sit on a base. It too does a magnetic balancing act. And I can actually spin the globe in any direction I wish, left or right. I just take my finger and push it in the opposite direction.

Do you see my finger print?



Oh, sorry, wrong photo. This one..



Now I suppose it would then be possible to do the same thing to our planet, if, my finger was big enough, or something that could act like a finger.

So yes, I agree the crust can "slip", even, in a controlled manner

originally posted by: AndyMayhew
If anything like that happened all advanced life on Earth would be wiped out. It'd take millions of years to recover. And we most certainly wouldn't be here to find there is absolutely no physical evidence it ever happened!

Thankyou for the Negative imput, Necessary Evil is essential.

Without it there is no Devil's advocate, and without a Devil's advocate there is only one side.

Have you considered involving something as fundemental as "scale" in your imagination when considering any possibilities?

What we experience in our reality is a microblip in time compared to the bigger picture, or perhaps the opposite if viewed from a molecular level.

If you could play the clip from the OP and slow it down creating a clip lasting a lifetime, but using the Earth the size of a tennis ball instead of the tool, what do you think you would notice and where could you find evidence at a single moment in all that time to eliminate the possibility of what we KNOW exists but on a different scale?

You can't prove a possibility doesn't exist.

a reply to: nerbot

Thankyou for the Negative imput, Necessary Evil is essential.

Yes, you do not know what you have until, it is gone. I'm sure human beings can supply enough evil on their own without help from, outsiders. Healthy negativity is a good thing, but there is a limit that has been, not only surpassed, but breached by light years!

A good old fashion fist fight was good enough when I was a kid. But this? This is not necessary!!! And if you think it is................

timothycharlesholmseth.com...

not to drift topic but there's a theory that China suffers climate catastrophe every 200 years or so. floods, famine, upheaval, resulting in a new dynasty.

I suspect there is some cycle to global climate. TPTB are freaking about possible global warming but its the cooling that worries me. In the last Ice Age, much of North America was covered in ice.
can we imagine the US government trying to buy living space from southern climes in this event? more likely the rich would pack up and leave the rest of us to freeze.