Whistleblower alleges FBI, DOJ have document revealing criminal scheme involving Biden

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: stevieray

The Speaker ultimately has authority over Capitol Hill Police. Theoretically they could order them to arrest whoever they want. At the end of the day though, an arrest means nothing if you're not actually being prosecuted.

Tell that to the people who want Trump arrested…….

What garbage

But but but I hate Trump and I love Wray !
The rules can’t be the same for them !
Rules should make me happy all the time !

originally posted by: stevieray

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Threadbare
Lol
Just quit with the bs

It’s not difficult

Gets proven wrong, keeps yipping and yapping.

What a cute little group we have here.

The old saying “just take the L” falls on deaf ears.

Dude
These people are still selling the piss dossier.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: shooterbrody

What BS? In order for a person to go to prison they need to be prosecuted. At the federal level, prosecution is handled by the DOJ.

Oh
Congress can’t hold them for contempt?
Really?

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: shooterbrody

So you're saying that the Speaker doesn't have authority over Capitol Hill Police? You realize that you're arguing against your own claims, right?

Nope
Nothing of the sort
Your BAMN powers don’t work here

a reply to: shooterbrody

Correct.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: shooterbrody



Correct.

Go tell your easily debunked misinformation elsewhere

www.law.cornell.edu...

Federal law penalizes individuals who refuse to respond to Congressional inquiries, as 2 U.S.C. § 192 states that any person who is summoned before Congress who "willfully makes default, or who, having appeared, refuses to answer any question pertinent to the question under inquiry" shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and may be subject to a fine and imprisonment if convicted.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: shooterbrody

Correct.

Use the quote function lol.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: shooterbrody

So you're saying that the Speaker doesn't have authority over Capitol Hill Police? You realize that you're arguing against your own claims, right?

I kinda sorta think that he never said this.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: shooterbrody

What BS? In order for a person to go to prison they need to be prosecuted. At the federal level, prosecution is handled by the DOJ.

The original point was that Wray could be arrested and jailed.
You said “nuh-uh !!!”
So of course you redirect to prosecution and prison,

originally posted by: EmeraldCoastFreedm

originally posted by: carewemust
Proud boys and other January 6th protesters and supporters now look like visionaries.

Most Americans wish they had succeeded in keeping Joe Biden from being installed in the White House.

4 or 5 of them just got convicted.

The "bad guys" will do more than convict a few people to keep themselves protected.

Especially now that we are nearing AN IMPORTANT MOMENT OF JOE BIDEN EXPOSURE

With the new GOP-led U.S. House moving closer to forcing the DOJ/FBI being to release information about JOE BIDEN's history of Blackmailing-Foreign-Leaders-For-Cash (and) Promising US Policy Actions For Cash from Foreign Leaders, there's probably a GOLD MINE of insight to be had here: qalerts.app... , which could be why Nancy Pelosi had Congress "Condemn" Q-Anon, just before the 2020 Presidential Steal was fully implemented.

Sept 25, 2020 - Q-Anon and His Messages are Officially "Condemned": www.congress.gov...

a reply to: shooterbrody

Congress is not a law enforcement agency. They have no authority to detain anyone. They could theoretically have Capitol Hill Police detain someone but nobody is going to prison if the DOJ chooses not to prosecute.

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: shooterbrody



Correct.

Go tell your easily debunked misinformation elsewhere

www.law.cornell.edu...

Federal law penalizes individuals who refuse to respond to Congressional inquiries, as 2 U.S.C. § 192 states that any person who is summoned before Congress who "willfully makes default, or who, having appeared, refuses to answer any question pertinent to the question under inquiry" shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and may be subject to a fine and imprisonment if convicted.

I think Hillary got away scott free.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: shooterbrody

Congress is not a law enforcement agency. They have no authority to detain anyone. They could theoretically have Capitol Hill Police detain someone but nobody is going to prison if the DOJ chooses not to prosecute.

Lol stop repeating yourself. Especially since it was laughed at several times already. You played games with semantics and half truths, and were spoofed.
They absolutely have the authority which was already explained.
Nothing theoretical about it.
We we never talking about prosecution and prison.
You have earned a rousing “you poor thing, bless your heart”.

a reply to: Threadbare

aside from the games, why is it that the left all of the sudden is no longer interested in foreign influence in our government? Almost as if the entire exercise was a BAMN tantrum.

a reply to: network dude
It was

originally posted by: network dude
www.foxnews.com...

A whistleblower is alleging that the FBI and the Justice Department are in possession of a document that describes a criminal scheme involving then-Vice President Joe Biden and a foreign national relating to the exchange of money for policy decisions, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer and Sen. Chuck Grassley said Wednesday.

Comer, R-Ky., and Grassley, R-Iowa, said the whistleblower claims the document "includes a precise description of how the alleged criminal scheme was employed as well as its purpose."

So it seems there was some smoke, now there is some fire. It's time to find out if the BIDEN DOJ will be Apolitical, or they will stall this out until Joe can make a graceful exist with some medical issues.

This information has been sent to the DOJ, Garland and Wray. How it is dealt with will be really interesting. I'm just imagining a montage of democrats smugly saying "Nobody is above the law", and then have them try to spin this as a Trump issue.

And please remember, this isn't the mud pit, so play nice or DTOM will come with that post that reminds us all that this isn't the mud pit.

5/30/2023

The document is explosive, and leads to other crimes committed by THE BIDEN FAMILY.

In fact, it's so "HOT", FBI Director Wray is willingly violating Federal Law today, to keep the document hidden.

FBI Director Christopher Wray gives Congress the Middle Finger.

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer is taking steps to hold FBI Director Christopher Wray in contempt of Congress after the Bureau notified the panel it will NOT comply with its subpoena related to a possible criminal scheme involving then-Vice President Joe Biden.

Comer, R-Ky., has subpoenaed the FBI for a document that allegedly describes a criminal scheme involving Biden and a foreign national and relating to the exchange of money for policy decisions. The document is an FBI-generated FD-1023 form.

Source: www.foxnews.com...

This should be fun! Let's see if the liberal media ignores this development. I wonder how long its been since a Cabinet Official has been found to be in "Contempt of Congress"?

5.30.2023

Statement from House Oversight Chairman, James Comer (R-Ky)...

“Today, the FBI informed the Committee that it will not provide the unclassified documents subpoenaed by the Committee. The FBI’s decision to stiff-arm Congress and hide this information from the American people is obstructionist and unacceptable," Comer said.

"While I have a call scheduled with FBI Director Wray tomorrow to discuss his response further, the Committee has been clear in its intent to protect Congressional oversight authorities and will now be taking steps to hold the FBI Director in contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with a lawful subpoena," he added.

"Americans deserve the truth, and the Oversight Committee will continue to demand transparency from this nation’s chief law enforcement agency."

justthenews.com...

I hope Comer isn't surprised.

The DOJ defied Congress during Trump's Presidency, when asked to produce Crossfire Hurricane (Obama entrapping Trump) documents. But the Congress at that time was run by "Deep State" participant, House Speaker PAUL RYAN.

Now the "MAGA FASCISTS", as President Joe Biden calls them, are in charge of the U.S. House.

a reply to: network dude

The FBI has offered to show the document in question to Comer, but that is not good enough for him. Why isn't viewing it in a secure FBI facility good enough for him? Evidently because he wants to release it to the public, even though the FBI said the unverified tip may falsely impugn the president, endanger the safety of human intelligence sources or compromise an ongoing or future investigation. Comer clearly isn't acting in good faith in this matter.

James Comer Rejects FBI’s Offer To Show Him Documents He's Requesting In Biden Probe

House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) has refused an offer from the FBI to view documents he’s requesting as part of an investigation into President Joe Biden.

On Wednesday, bureau Director Christopher Wray spoke by phone with Comer and Sen Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) about the paperwork — a form reflecting a tip to the FBI that allegedly implicates Biden in some kind of bribery scheme from his time as vice president. Afterward, Comer said in a statement that Wray “offered to allow us to see the documents in person at FBI headquarters,” but that seeing the material isn’t good enough — he wants to have the paperwork in his office.

According to the Oversight chair, a tipster told the FBI in June 2020 about a $5 million bribery scheme involving Biden and a foreign national whom Comer has not identified. Comer has described the unverified tip as key to his efforts to show that the Biden family is corrupt.

Comer asked for the tip form earlier this month with a congressional subpoena. The FBI refused to produce the documents, saying that doing so could endanger a human source and compromise current or future investigations — and that the tip is unverified.

“Recording the information does not validate the information, establish its credibility, or weigh it against other information known or developed by the FBI,” wrote Christopher Dunham, the FBI’s acting assistant director for congressional affairs, in a May 10 letter to Comer and Grassley.

Republicans could file a lawsuit asking a court to enforce the subpoena. Federal judges generally rule in favor of Congress when lawmakers demand information from the executive branch, though the fact that the FBI has already shown a willingness to provide access to the material would likely hurt Republicans’ case in such a suit.

“This silly charade by Chairman Comer is yet another reminder that his so-called ‘investigations’ are political stunts not meant to get information but to spread thin innuendo and falsehoods to attack the President,” White House spokesman Ian Sams said in an emailed statement.

“He has already admitted this isn’t about uncovering facts but about trying to hurt the President’s poll numbers, so the only question left is how long he will waste time, energy, and taxpayer dollars to support a fact-free politically-motivated goose chase simply to get media attention and the Fox News spotlight.”

Comer can go ahead and submit a criminal referral for contempt of Congress by the DOJ in ignoring the subpoena, but the DOJ isn't likely to pursue charges against itself.

a reply to: MrInquisitive
So just comply with congress.
The fbi has now verified the document exists.
That fact alone is going to produce a world of questions.

A sitting presidents family too bribes?
A sitting president took bribes?

originally posted by: MrInquisitive
a reply to: network dude

The FBI has offered to show the document in question to Comer, but that is not good enough for him. Why isn't viewing it in a secure FBI facility good enough for him? Evidently because he wants to release it to the public, even though the FBI said the unverified tip may falsely impugn the president, endanger the safety of human intelligence sources or compromise an ongoing or future investigation. Comer clearly isn't acting in good faith in this matter.

James Comer Rejects FBI’s Offer To Show Him Documents He's Requesting In Biden Probe

House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) has refused an offer from the FBI to view documents he’s requesting as part of an investigation into President Joe Biden.

On Wednesday, bureau Director Christopher Wray spoke by phone with Comer and Sen Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) about the paperwork — a form reflecting a tip to the FBI that allegedly implicates Biden in some kind of bribery scheme from his time as vice president. Afterward, Comer said in a statement that Wray “offered to allow us to see the documents in person at FBI headquarters,” but that seeing the material isn’t good enough — he wants to have the paperwork in his office.

According to the Oversight chair, a tipster told the FBI in June 2020 about a $5 million bribery scheme involving Biden and a foreign national whom Comer has not identified. Comer has described the unverified tip as key to his efforts to show that the Biden family is corrupt.

Comer asked for the tip form earlier this month with a congressional subpoena. The FBI refused to produce the documents, saying that doing so could endanger a human source and compromise current or future investigations — and that the tip is unverified.

“Recording the information does not validate the information, establish its credibility, or weigh it against other information known or developed by the FBI,” wrote Christopher Dunham, the FBI’s acting assistant director for congressional affairs, in a May 10 letter to Comer and Grassley.

Republicans could file a lawsuit asking a court to enforce the subpoena. Federal judges generally rule in favor of Congress when lawmakers demand information from the executive branch, though the fact that the FBI has already shown a willingness to provide access to the material would likely hurt Republicans’ case in such a suit.

“This silly charade by Chairman Comer is yet another reminder that his so-called ‘investigations’ are political stunts not meant to get information but to spread thin innuendo and falsehoods to attack the President,” White House spokesman Ian Sams said in an emailed statement.

“He has already admitted this isn’t about uncovering facts but about trying to hurt the President’s poll numbers, so the only question left is how long he will waste time, energy, and taxpayer dollars to support a fact-free politically-motivated goose chase simply to get media attention and the Fox News spotlight.”

Comer can go ahead and submit a criminal referral for contempt of Congress by the DOJ in ignoring the subpoena, but the DOJ isn't likely to pursue charges against itself.

FBI / DOJ are hiding evidence, and they would normally be investigating each other if this wasn’t fully corrupt clown world.

The only remedy is public disclosure. And it’s a fully legal, prescribed method of this committee.

We know you know this, and you’re only posting here to derail and annoy.