Whistleblower alleges FBI, DOJ have document revealing criminal scheme involving Biden

a reply to: shooterbrody

Cool. We trust Barr now? He stated there was no election fraud and Trump is likely to be indicted as he "had no claim to the documents". Weird. I never saw you post Barr's comments to that effect on any of those threads and changing your position.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: shooterbrody

Cool. We trust Barr now? He stated there was no election fraud and Trump is likely to be indicted as he "had no claim to the documents". Weird. I never saw you post Barr's comments to that effect on any of those threads and changing your position.

What “we”?

Also Barr is much more credible than those who posted the magistrate who issued the Trump margalo search warrant was beheaded.

Barr is covering his ass and he poo pooped on all your “Rudy” misinformation.
This info is damning for mr Biden.
He accepted bribes.

www.foxnews.com...

The interview

Breaking..

The full House Oversight Committee just finished viewing the FBI-obtained evidence, that V.P. Joe Biden took a $5 million dollar bribe, to effect U.S. foreign policy.

Here is one response...

A GOP lawmaker on the House Oversight and Accountability Committee who reviewed the subpoenaed FBI document that alleges President Joe Biden was involved in a criminal bribery scheme said the allegations in the document are "worse than has been reported so far."

Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., told Fox News Digital after her review of the FD-1023 document, which the FBI on Thursday allowed the full committee to review, that there is "damning evidence the sitting president of the United States sold out his country in an ongoing bribery scheme."

"The American people and media deserve to see the evidence. We should follow the facts," she said.

Source: www.foxnews.com...

Chairman Comer and Minority Party Leader Raskin, were also allowed to see, and briefed on, 2 additional documents that are even more "sensitive".

a reply to: shooterbrody

Ok great. But you avoided the question and deflected. If he's credible, then he also "poo pooped" election fraud and states Trump "had no rights" to the documents and will be indicted in the case, then you accept that as well? Because he said this months ago but you never posted his comments and still screech "infringed rights!" "He did nothing wrong!"

And so all they have to do next step is get the guy in to testify who told the informant this info along with his proof. Bring him or her in. I've no problem with that. You will need more than "the informant heard".

a reply to: frogs453
Your credibility on this is shot.
This is legit.
Now you get to own it.

The bank records, the irs records, now the fbi record in which the fbi was told AND DID NOTHING.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Still deflecting? I just said I have no problem with them bringing the informants proof and source in.

But uh, for the 3rd time. You have now changed your stance on the documents case and election fraud as Barr is now deemed credible?

a reply to: frogs453
They don’t need you permission.

Barr is covering his own ass.
He knew this information all along, and just today when the fbi delivered the evidence he speaks.

Your “Rudy” crap was crap.
This is a legit scandal much worse than anything trump has done.
Biden accepted bribes to shape policy.

Own it.

Let’s see how fast you call for the peach mint factory to restart.

a reply to: frogs453

Ive been thinking that the informant might not even be an American in the US. It would explain why the FBI didn't feel they could protect him. It would also explain why they don't want his identity revealed.

So getting him in to testify doesn't seem feasible, if this is the case.

a reply to: carewemust
When asked Biden replied “ Where's the money?.”

Wow

a reply to: shooterbrody

And still deflecting. I've no problem with them bringing in the source or trying to impeach Biden.

However you only believing Barr in this case but choosing to not believe his other statements is typical but funny.

a reply to: frogs453
You claiming this was from Rudy guiliani is funny.
You claiming the magistrate that issued the trump warrant was beheaded was funny.
You claiming this was disinformation is funny.

I never said I believe Barr, you posted that.
I just reported what he said when interviewed today.

Barr also said trump “might” get indicted for obstruction, nothing else.
But you won’t like that either.

Too freaking funny.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: shooterbrody

And still deflecting. I've no problem with them bringing in the source or trying to impeach Biden.

However you only believing Barr in this case but choosing to not believe his other statements is typical but funny.

Seems obvious that Barr isn't going to defend either Biden or Trump and is going to call them the way he sees them.

Doesn't make every opinion of Barr's correct, does it?

a reply to: shooterbrody

CNN is pulling their hair out over Trump making plans to score another bump in the polls and fundraising from this next indictment. "He's summoning his campaign advisors to Mar-A-Largo to plan how they can get the most mileage out of this!"

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: carewemust
When asked Biden replied “ Where's the money?.”

Wow

Biden is mentally fried...well done. Yesterday he told reporters that he's going to be a PGA Golfer.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: shooterbrody

CNN is pulling their hair out over Trump making plans to score another bump in the polls and fundraising from this next indictment. "He's summoning his campaign advisors to Mar-A-Largo to plan how they can get the most mileage out of this!"

Why wouldn’t they?
It appears to me the keystone cops at the doj and fbi want Trump elected.

The difference in treatment selected by party affiliation is disgusting.

It highlights our 2 tier justice system.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Well then I can play like you. Barr lied about there being no election fraud and that Trump had no right to the documents, so he must be lying here too. No? Or yes he is credible now and then as well. I mean you're just "reporting" what he said yet you say "this is damning". Gotta pick a lane shooter. If you're not believing Barr today and just "reporting", today is no more damning than yesterday, and a liar is disputing Raskin. Or he's telling the truth as he did before and you just refuse to believe the rest, because..umm Trump.

MTG mentioned something today that they don't actually know of or have the person who actually made the claim to the informant? That's not helpful to them at all.

And if all Trump did was obstruct, why would I not like that? I'm not looking for false charges against anyone. If the evidence does not show anything else, he should not be charged with anything else.

a reply to: frogs453
I don’t care if you like Barr or not.
I don’t care if you think he is credible or not.

What I do care about is the sitting president took bribes to shape policy.

The bank transaction records are proof.
The irs records are proof.
The fbi records are proof.

The first 2 were verified.
Today the 3rd was verified.

The fact you don’t care that the sitting president accepted bribes to shape policy is very sad.

Reporting tonight from congressional representatives is that the Fd1023 shows president Biden was paid 5 million to get rid of the prosecutor. There are multiple Fd1023 forms about this.
The prosecutor he joked about getting fired.

Lol
They have the bank records

June 13, 2023 Democrats Deflect to Protect Crooked Joe.

JAMES COMER, Head of the House Oversight Committee, wants Americans to know this about Democrats' circling their wagons around Joe Biden, regarding the $5 Million payoff he accepted from the Foreign National Executive at BURISMA Gas Company...

Despite growing evidence, the White House and Democrats are lying to the American people about the allegations contained within this record and what was done with it. Let me set the record straight:

First, Democrats are peddling conspiracy theories and alleging the FD-1023 record is based on secondhand hearsay. The FD-1023 record was generated by a trusted confidential source who was working with the FBI for over ten years.

Second, Democrats claim that the record is part of the documents Rudy Giuliani provided the FBI in January 2020. That’s not true. The FD-1023 document stands on its own and contains information from the FBI’s confidential human source dating back to another FD-1023 generated in 2017.

Third, the FD-1023 was generated by the FBI in June 2020 based on other FBI records dating back to 2017. The Department of Justice conducted an assessment on separate material provided to the Department in January 2020, and this assessment was closed in August 2020. Democrats are claiming the DOJ investigated the FD-1023 and then took no action, but the FBI has refused to answer what information was part of their assessment. How could the DOJ have conducted a credible, thorough investigation in four weeks? It’s not possible.

And last, let’s be very clear: The allegations in the record are not closed. FBI officials and former Attorney General William Barr have refuted Democrats’ lies that the Biden bribery investigation was closed. "On the contrary, it was sent to Delaware for further investigation," former Attorney General Barr said this week on the record.

Continued at: www.foxnews.com...

6-16-2023 - NEW DEVELOPMENT

House Oversight Committee's Democrat leader, JAMIE RASKIN, has requested that the FBI brief the entire Committee, the same way he and Chairman Comer were briefed, 2 weeks ago.

Raskin says the investigation into JOE and HUNTER BIDEN receiving $10 million from Burisma was CLOSED, with nothing illegal found.

Supposedly, the FBI will say the same thing, if FBI Director Wray allows the briefing requested in Raskin's letter.

See the letter and analysis here: www.washingtonexaminer.com...

This should be interesting! Will the HONEST elements of the FBI, or the CROOKED elements of the FBI, deliver the briefing???