It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Whistleblower alleges FBI, DOJ have document revealing criminal scheme involving Biden

page: 9
54
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 18 2023 @ 03:32 PM
link   
A White Buffalo has been born 😎



posted on May, 19 2023 @ 05:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: xuenchen

Two of whistleblowers, just today, while testifying, admitted to being paid by Kash Patel.


I'd say I just don't understand why this is so hard, but knowing the audience it make sense. I don't give a rats ass about the whistleblowers. I DO care about what they are bringing to the table. It's a typical smear campaign and something a political asshole would do, but here at ATS we are better than that. So pay attention to WHAT is said, and less attention to WHO said it.

This is about weaponization of the FBI and DOJ. Two offices that need to be Apolitical and operate based on the laws, and only the laws. The part where currently YOUR side is being protected is nice, but one day it may not be that way. THAT part is what makes me wonder if any on the left have ever thought past right now. Vision is the ability to look at the current and past situation, and extrapolate what the future might be. You can't know it, but you can plan for it. And the left is wallowing in the "right now". There seems to be a much bigger game at play, and it's not left or right.

Folks need to start thinking.



posted on May, 19 2023 @ 05:59 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

The FBI was weaponized against the Left for the majority of its existence. Maybe it is apolitical now and you just don't realize it because it's finally going after those on the Right.

Or maybe this is that whole pendulum thing you guys are always warning about.

Either way, you guys didn't seem to be too worried about the politicization of the FBI when it was being used to round up Leftists.



posted on May, 19 2023 @ 06:00 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

And you totally trust everything they say right? Disgruntled employees fired for not performing their jobs, closing investigations on violent subjects, lying to their superiors, stealing information.

Being paid by, represented by attorney's and given jobs by the current administration's political rival? Not fitting the legal description of a Whistleblower but speaking out after they were paid?

Just curious. And weirdly enough Jim Jordan tried to discredit Vindman's testimony a few years ago based off comments from his superiors, and he wasn't even being paid by Trump's political rivals and was still employed.
edit on 19-5-2023 by frogs453 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 19 2023 @ 06:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: network dude

And you totally trust everything they say right? Disgruntled employees fired for not performing their jobs, closing investigations on violent subjects, lying to their superiors, stealing information.

Being paid by, represented by attorney's and given jobs by the current administration's political rival? Not fitting the legal description of a Whistleblower but speaking out after they were paid?

Just curious. And weirdly enough Jim Jordan tried to discredit Vindman's testimony a few years ago based off comments from his superiors, and he wasn't even being paid by Trump's political rivals and was still employed.


Jesus, if being thick was a competition, you'd win. No, you don't just blindly believe. Like Believe all women. That's stupid. But you should listen to what's said, verify it's veracity, and evaluate it's truthfulness. But if you just disparage the speaker, you miss the message. And yes, both sides do it, and it doesn't make it any less stupid. Or do you operate on the "eye for an eye" type existence?



posted on May, 19 2023 @ 07:00 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude
I get that. Do you do this with all of these investigations regardless of political sides? I may have missed you giving credence to other investigation testimonies. As we seem to rarely agree, I must have missed that.



posted on May, 19 2023 @ 07:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: network dude

The FBI was weaponized against the Left for the majority of its existence. Maybe it is apolitical now and you just don't realize it because it's finally going after those on the Right.

Or maybe this is that whole pendulum thing you guys are always warning about.

Either way, you guys didn't seem to be too worried about the politicization of the FBI when it was being used to round up Leftists.


quote me.



posted on May, 19 2023 @ 07:32 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

I can't. That's the point. You were silent all the years the FBI and DoJ were politicized against the Left.

Where are all your threads when it was revealed that the DoJ had worked with Project Veritas to fabricate evidence against the J20 protesters? The way I remember it, I was the only one on here wanting to discuss that little piece of DoJ politicization.



posted on May, 19 2023 @ 07:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: network dude

I can't. That's the point. You were silent all the years the FBI and DoJ were politicized against the Left.

Where are all your threads when it was revealed that the DoJ had worked with Project Veritas to fabricate evidence against the J20 protesters? The way I remember it, I was the only one on here wanting to discuss that little piece of DoJ politicization.


You mean the DOJ and FBI were going after ACTUAL criminals some time ago? I remember those days too.



posted on May, 19 2023 @ 08:05 AM
link   
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Peaceful protesters and members of the media that were already in police custody before any property damage occurred are criminals?

Do you approve of the fact that the DoJ fabricated evidence while withholding exculpatory evidence in an attempt to have these people sent away to prison for up to 70+ years?



posted on May, 19 2023 @ 08:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Peaceful protesters and members of the media that were already in police custody before any property damage occurred are criminals?

Do you approve of the fact that the DoJ fabricated evidence while withholding exculpatory evidence in an attempt to have these people sent away to prison for up to 70+ years?


Ah yes , sorry, I forget they were mostly peaceful.



posted on May, 19 2023 @ 08:51 AM
link   
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

The fact that you didn't answer my second question makes me believe that you did support those actions by the DoJ.



posted on May, 19 2023 @ 10:26 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Don't forget ATS insists there were absolutely no peaceful protesters in 2020, in contradiction to J6 where they insist it was just "a few bad apples", "the police incited them", "they were just using their right to peacefully assemble" "it was the feds". You know, all the things that may have been pointed out for 2020, but was fully objected to here.

It's sad but amusing to watch the tides turn. Many many things said in 2020 raising concerns among some of us was ridiculed, but boy when the tables are turned the sudden outrage and shock, acting like this kind of thing is new is funny. Well, and sad.
edit on 19-5-2023 by frogs453 because: Grammar



posted on May, 19 2023 @ 10:45 AM
link   
a reply to: frogs453
Lol

Many of us here disagree with how laws are enforced, and have for some time; no matter who it is or who is in office.

Cheering on the tyranny is always disgusting.
But
You do you



posted on May, 19 2023 @ 10:51 AM
link   
a reply to: frogs453

It was funny watching them act like no protesters had ever been tear gassed before. Meanwhile, a few months earlier, they cheered on as law enforcement tear gassed, maced, pepper balled, and shot protesters with rubber bullets all because Trump wanted his picture taken.



posted on May, 19 2023 @ 10:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254

When? Politicized against the left? The FBI? Can you please give at least one real example?



posted on May, 19 2023 @ 10:56 AM
link   
a reply to: matafuchs

Well there's their involvement in the assassinations of MLK and Malcolm X.



posted on May, 19 2023 @ 10:57 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254


Inspector General Mark Lee Greenblatt wrote that β€œthe evidence did not support a finding that the [United States Park Police] cleared the park on June 1, 2020, so that then President Trump could enter the park.” The protesters were instead removed β€œto allow a contractor to safely install anti-scale fencing in response to destruction of Federal property and injury to officers that occured on May 30 and May 31” during other Black Lives Matter protests.


Yeah, take a look at some of these pics. Looks just like 1/6.

Link



posted on May, 19 2023 @ 11:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: network dude

I can't. That's the point. You were silent all the years the FBI and DoJ were politicized against the Left.

Where are all your threads when it was revealed that the DoJ had worked with Project Veritas to fabricate evidence against the J20 protesters? The way I remember it, I was the only one on here wanting to discuss that little piece of DoJ politicization.


just so I understand you here, because you feel the FBI was unjust to democrats in the past, you now feel that it's OK that they are unjust towards republicans now?

Hey DERP, you just proved my point. If you think this won't turn back around, you are an idiot. And you even brought examples. I have no words, they aren't needed. You just need to hear you. Try it.



posted on May, 19 2023 @ 11:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: matafuchs

Well there's their involvement in the assassinations of MLK and Malcolm X.


don't forget the civil war.




top topics



 
54
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join