posted on Apr, 22 2023 @ 12:06 PM
a reply to:
Sookiechacha
This is wrong on many levels and for many reasons.
The Supreme Court was correct in their ruling that we should not be taking a perpetrator's life if the perpetrator did not take a life. Even the
Biblical "eye for an eye" logic would find this abhorrent. It's no longer about justice, or deterring future abuse, or even paying their debt to
society. It's about vengeance and vindictiveness and tyranny. It's saying, "You hurt someone so we're gonna hurt you the
worst way possible and
revel in every minute of it. It does nothing to further the principles of justice, just blood lust.
For all the whining and crying about thugs and antifa and BLM being violent killers, the only difference I see is that conservatives hide (and cheer)
behind a government gun... and the death penalty. They're just as violent and blood-thirsty, they're just cowards who empower and embolden
"authorities" to do their dirty work for them... while pretending like they're all about law and order.
As a society, and a Republic, we have guiding principles and standards to respect and honor ALL life, to temper justice with mercy, to work towards
rehabilitation and restitution for offenders to become responsible and non-threatening members of society. When that is not possible, we
institutionalize -- whether in prison or in a medical hospital or a therapeutic facility. We take the high road. We understand that the right to
life comes from our Creator and it is not for us to take what God has granted. WE DO NOT KILL.
Slippery slope indeed. If this is allowed to stand, what next? What other crimes will we deem worthy of death? Rape would be the first and most
obvious, being closest in nature to child sexual abuse. What about child abuse in general? Will the mom who snaps and slaps her kid across the face
be next? Will it be the husband/wife who gets angry and throws a glass at the wall? How about the spouse that cheats and "kills" the marriage? The
drunk driver who didn't even have an accident... but could have donchaknow!
Bottom Line: If murder isn't the standard for the death penalty, then what is? How will that be defined? And by whom???