Looks like Russia took out a NATO command centre

a reply to: Zaphod58

Who actually believes anything posted anywhere, this is the age of total disinformation compliments of the T.V. Of course there will be some truth with the lies. The truth is you can bet that targeting NATO in a war zone would have top priority.

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: Zaphod58

Who actually believes anything posted anywhere, this is the age of total disinformation compliments of the T.V. Of course there will be some truth with the lies. The truth is you can bet that targeting NATO in a war zone would have top priority.

They just bombed there own city on accident.
So I don't think they have the abilities to make such a precise hit into a ventilation shaft.
Also wasn't that from the new top gun movie lol

a reply to: Allaroundyou

I wonder who said that. ?

a reply to: anonentity

The Russian Defense Ministry.

Local authorities did not say what caused the blast, but the Russian defence ministry released a statement saying a fighter aircraft had lost ammunition over Belgorod.

"During the flight of the Su-34 aircraft of the aerospace forces over the city of Belgorod, an abnormal descent of aviation ammunition has occurred," the ministry said.

The statement carried by Russian news agencies added that the incident had taken place at 22:15 local time.

www.themoscowtimes.com...

The Russian Defense Ministry has identified the cause of an explosion in Belgorod as the unintended release of an aerial bomb. The projectile left a massive crater in a residential area and destroyed several vehicles, but did not cause any injuries.

The “unusual descent of an aviation munition” took place around 10:15pm Moscow time, as an Su-34 of the Russian Air Force flew over Belgorod, the ministry said in a statement. The Russian military has launched an investigation into the incident.

www.rt.com...

a reply to: anonentity

So what 400ft deep bunker in Iraq did you watch being taken out by a 500/1000lb Paveway?

Some links to that one might be nice.

We all watched them taking out bunkers and reinforced structures during both Gulf wars, not quite sure how many of them were 400ft deep.

You do realize that they tend to reinforce the ventilation shafts never mind close them off during air raids or cruise missile attacks?

Also, i think you may find that Russia won't send planes anywhere near the airspace of Kyiv.

Because they would be blown out of the sky by the air defense system that's in place or mere MANPADS long before they got anywhere near the required distance(about 50km max) to launch their bunker busters.

I don't know why you simply cannot admit that in this instance you and your Russian propaganda piece are full of s#it.

a reply to: Vroomfondel

Or just use two 200ft penetrators, most bombing runs use more than one bomber. It isn't impossible to fathom.

a reply to: ADVISOR

Kh-59MKM – penetrator version that eliminated the seeker section and fitted a 360 kg (790 lb) warhead, able to penetrate 3m of reinforced concrete.

Seems like the penetrator version of the Russian Kinzhal can manage about 3m of reinforced concrete, not quite so sure as to 200ft earth first.

a reply to: anonentity

That's about as credible as Biden having won the 2020 election.

a reply to: anonentity



Let`s get back to reality shall we ?

the Kinzhal Wiki if you look at operation history there is an entry about the march 9 attack that used 6 of them. While this does not say anything about a UN bunker it certainly possible. Hyper sonic projectiles can penetrate very deep and the Kinzhal is nuke capable. You wouldn't have to be a very high yield at all. Like using a quarter stick on a stump instead of a full stick of dynamite.

a reply to: anonentity

"Who actually believes anything posted anywhere, this is the age of total disinformation compliments of the T.V. Of course there will be some truth with the lies. The truth is you can bet that targeting NATO in a war zone would have top priority."

Look here, old chap, you will forgive me, but I find it difficult to find any credibility in what you are posting as, despite the fact that others have ripped your claims to shreds, you still keep going with them.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2


Is my logic flawed? or is it something that you don't want to believe is possible? is NATO at war with Russia ? remember you can't be a little bit pregnant.

a reply to: anonentity

Your OP is trashed. Your logic and your claims are, putting it politely, flawed.

Your Star Wars Death Star destroying fantasy is exposed as an utter joke.

With the the greatest respect.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

With the greatest respect, shooting the messenger won't stop the problem.

a reply to: anonentity

No, just pointing out that your claims have been shown to be false.

a reply to: Allaroundyou

I was going to say.. this sounds like someone just watched Top Gun 2 and decided to troll some people.

a reply to: PainGod

So you are suggesting that Russia would be stupid enough to launch low-yield nuclear bunker busters at a target in the Ukrainian capital?

Do you have any idea as to the repercussions such an attack would provoke or involve?

That's pretty much the beginning of a third world war.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: ADVISOR

Kh-59MKM – penetrator version that eliminated the seeker section and fitted a 360 kg (790 lb) warhead, able to penetrate 3m of reinforced concrete.

Seems like the penetrator version of the Russian Kinzhal can manage about 3m of reinforced concrete, not quite so sure as to 200ft earth first.

Yes three meters is standard for an average unit;
The BLU-109/B is filled with 530 pounds (240 kg) of Tritonal. It has a delayed-action tail-fuze. The BLU-109 entered service in 1985.

This weapon can penetrate 4–6 feet (1.2–1.8 m) of reinforced concrete.

Again, multiple bombs will clear a hole in no time.
Especially if combined with DEW etc.

a reply to: ADVISOR

And how would Russia manage to get these "multiple bombs" anywhere near the area given that they are launched from the likes of Su-24M or the Su-27IB which cannot enter the airspace near Kyiv without being blown out of the sky?

As to your mention of DEW, tell me you not referring to directed energy weapons?

Because to my knowledge, Russia don't have any lasers, microwave or particle beam weapons capable of penetrating 400ft of earth.

I think you may be confusing their capabilities with the city destroyers in the likes of Independence day. LoL

hahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahaha

Ummmm. sorry.


hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha


I mean, ok I'm trying....

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Ok, I'm better.

This story is so #ing unbelievable I am surprised you even took the time to post it. It must have been that NATO general they captured last year that gave the super secret location of the super secret NATO bunker.

Ya that's it