Looks like Russia took out a NATO command centre

a reply to: Kenzo

The strategy is to discredit anyone who does not follow the narrative. The destruction of the fourth estate and its replacement by corporate trolls will have far greater consequences than anyone could ever think of. It was the only real watchdog on the tyrants and criminals. Without it, no balance can be achieved so the only truth allowed will a distortion of reality.

a reply to: anonentity


Sounds quite hypocrite when you write about press being watchdog of tyrants and criminals and yet you are the one that have expressed so many times here supporting terrorist organization named Russia, it`s criminal mass murderer /psychopatch nazi Putin .


It`s obvious you have flipped to state where you cant see reality , you live in fantacy...dream World .

a reply to: PainGod

PainGod, Putin has pretty much been told by the other nuclear-armed nations that he is personally targeted at all times down to his antics in Ukraine and the fact that he keeps on rattling his nuclear saber.

And if he is silly enough to unleash nukes because his piss-poor, ill-equipped, and poorly-trained invasion "farce" can't get the job done via conventional means.

Then he would most likely be the next target to receive a very similar response should he decide to chuck nukes out of the pram of any sorts.

Also, you're really trying to tell me that a low-yield nuclear device that can displace 400ft of hard-packed earth and then destroy a reinforced concrete bunker is not going to release some sort of mushroom cloud or massive amounts of debris into the air?

Because my bet is it's the explosion is going to be detectable via a few different means both seismic and atmospheric.

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Are you really in denial shame?
Admit it Carpy you and everyone else haven't got a clue what is happening to their taxes. Do you really want to have a war with Russia? I see that a tit-for-tat withdrawal of diplomatic staff has occurred between Germany and Russia. Not a good sign.

Well, I am denying your OP. "Deny Ignorance". And whatnot.

No, I don't want a war with Russia.

Why even ask me that?

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: Allaroundyou

I wonder who said that. ?

Russia.

tass.com...

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Here it is from another independent analysis.www.bitchute.com...

a reply to: anonentity

In the video, the dude says Russia used 6 Kinzhal missiles for the first time which is completely incorrect.

Russia's first use of the Kinzhal missile was to take out a munitions dump in southwestern Ukraine back in March 19, 2022.

So I'm apt to ponder your man's independent analysis credibility-wise.

And again your source is Bitchute which is a service notoriously known for hosting far-right individuals, lunatic conspiracy theorists, and hate speech.

a reply to: andy06shake

Russia is discovering, like other countries before, that 'wonder weapons' are only effective to a point.

Someday, Russian tourists will gaze upon Kinzhal missiles as museum exhibits in Ukraine, much like Japanese tourists today view 'Long Lance' torpedoes at the Pearl Harbor museum.

Cheers

a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

Someday, Russian tourists will gaze upon Kinzhal missiles as museum exhibits in Ukraine, much like Japanese tourists today view 'Long Lance' torpedoes at the Pearl Harbor museum.

Possibly.

My bet is a long time after Ukraine has become part of NATO.

And the Russian nation is no longer considered to be the pariah of Europe, down to Putin's sins regarding his invasion and occupation of Ukraine.

a reply to: anonentity

"Independent analysis"?!!!!

Are you having a laugh?!!!

LOL!

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

It looks like the Greeks originally reported the hit. This is in Russian but the "more "tag on the comments makes the story creditable. www.bitchute.com...

a reply to: anonentity

You need to stay away from Bitshute.

As for credibility, you lost that when you posted your bs OP.

Just give it up.

Look, we know the secret command bunker must have been destroyed ...... because there is no evidence whatsoever it now exists! If it doesn't exist now, it must have been destroyed. Along with the 600 generals who also do not exist.

Simples

a reply to: anonentity

I heard this too. It was in retaliation for the west attacking civilians in Russia via Ukrainian special forces/terrorists (same thing really).

I heard "up to 300 officers/officials" were killed with "dozens" of NATO officers/officials amongst them. Was with a supersonic, as both a retaliation and future warning about sending western trained and supported terrorists into Russia.

originally posted by: Quintilian
I heard "up to 300 officers/officials" were killed with "dozens" of NATO officers/officials amongst them.

What you heard was misinformation. Echoes perhaps? In your chamber?

If 300 NATO staff had been killed in Ukraine, then there is no way this would have been kept secret.

a reply to: Quintilian

I heard this too. It was in retaliation for the west attacking civilians in Russia via Ukrainian special forces/terrorists (same thing really).

I heard "up to 300 officers/officials" were killed with "dozens" of NATO officers/officials amongst them. Was with a supersonic, as both a retaliation and future warning about sending western trained and supported terrorists into Russia.

From who where and when did you ""hear"" this?

Some credible links to back up and support the claims you ""heard"" might be nice.