Looks like Russia took out a NATO command centre

originally posted by: tamusan
a reply to: anonentity

At this rate NATO is going to run out of command centers in Ukraine.

Your question should be ,"Why the hell does NATO have command centres in Ukraine?".

a reply to: glen200376'

I think it is entirely plausible that they would take out a NATO command center as that is the brains of Ukraine. It does not matter how deep down the center is, if you keep hammering the place You end up with a crater at the relevant depth. Let's face it it was a gift as NATO officers were not supposed to be there so they can't be killed right? no diplomatic worries.

a reply to: anonentity

Then don't you think that news of a crater of that size in the country's capital would have made its rounds on many social media platforms?
But no it is only on poopchute and one website that claims it is an exclusive story only by them?
You are gullible

I think this is Russian propaganda. Trying to justify targeting Kyiv where civilians live.

If numerous Western officials were killed in a Russian strike, I think something official would have seeped out. You just cannot hide things like that any more.

How NATO is operating to support Ukraine is unknown. The Russian narrative is that it is NATO who they are fighting, so any opportunity to make up stories to fit that narrative is what they will do. Some may even believe these stories, as is demonstrated by this discussion.

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: glen200376'
It does not matter how deep down the center is, if you keep hammering the place You end up with a crater at the relevant depth.

Can confirm, that's how it worked in Worms 2: Armageddon too.

a reply to: anonentity

What kind of non-nuclear missile can take out bunkers 400 feet underground?

An example of a Russian bunker buster is the KAB-1500L-Pr. It is delivered with the Su-24M and the Su-27IB aircraft. It is stated to be able to penetrate 10–20 m of earth or 2 m of reinforced concrete. The bomb weighs 1,500 kg (3,300 lb), with 1,100 kg (2,400 lb) being the high explosive penetrating warhead.

Perhaps some type of a thermobaric weapon, aka vacuum bomb. Sucking oxygen out of your lungs. It must be massive one. Ruzzia has some crazy deadly bombs in their storage

OMG, I think I just # my pants laughing so hard at the idea that anyone would find this believable enough to bring it to ATS. ...and that's saying something, considering the bat# craziness that gets posted on the regular.

a reply to: WeDemBoyz

The closest Russian weapon i can find that would be anywhere near capable of penetrating 400 feet and taking out a reinforced concrete bunker would be the KAB-1500S-E which is a precision-guided bomb with a launch distance of about 50km, and even then I'm rather skeptical it could achieve such a depth of penetration and damage.

a reply to: Allaroundyou

No doubt if you have the plans for the building, seeing the Russians probably built it then it is reasonable to assume that they have. With the newer weapons a weak spot like the entrance would be targeted, once the missile explodes, the people inside would know what it was like to be in the barrel of a gum. The blast doors most likely would have not been shut, as that would require an air raid to be sounded a hypersonic missile would have just hit before any warnings. Anyway, the West is taking the Piss now, Zelensky would have sued for peace if it wasn't for Boris. The only reason he is still hanging on is for personal gain and the hope that the West sends troops and arms. Which will start a world war and more chaos. This seems to be the way it's going, as every decision made these days points in that direction.

a reply to: anonentity

Well, they cannot build their own aircraft carriers, why would you assume Russians built the bunkers in Ukraine and not the Ukrainians themselves?

a reply to: anonentity

I can only assume these were the same 300 NATO high command members that were captured in Mariupol and summarily executed in Russia.

Damn NATO and their Lazarus Pools.

On a more serious note, what makes you think, after all we've seen of Russia's capabilities, actually have the ability to hit the same target multiple times?

a reply to: anonentity

People on Twitter know when Russian air strikes are being launched before the aircraft leave the ground, but the Ukraine forces don’t have a clue until the missile hits? A hypersonic missile isn’t some magic weapon that can’t be detected, and penetrates insane distances into the ground.

a reply to: pteridine

It was Luca Brasi.

Spetnatz put a horse's head in Bidens bed on the same night .

a reply to: glen200376
You beat me to it. Everybody seems to be ignoring this question. We have never had any chance to vote against this conflict. And I certainly don't want NATO involved. In fact I honestly think we should dissolve NATO. As it's been a useless vast waste of money. AND NO I don't believe Russia or China wants to destroy the UK or Europe. It's happening now, if they want the US or the UK they would just wait and buy us or just walk in as our collective governments are hell bent on bankrupting our countries.

a reply to: glen200376

I was being sarcastic, as usual.

We can command just fine from our living rooms.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

"You’d think people who make as a matter of fact threads using a tweet as a source only to be proven wrong would be humbled."

Humbled? That's putting it rather mildly...

Is this in the Hoax bin yet?

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: Allaroundyou

edit on 20-4-2023 by Oldcarpy2 because: (no reason given)

originally posted by: glen200376

originally posted by: tamusan
a reply to: anonentity

At this rate NATO is going to run out of command centers in Ukraine.

Your question should be ,"Why the hell does NATO have command centres in Ukraine?".

Another good question is "Why does the US need to fund 30+ bio labs in the Ukraine?" I think that there is/was one in Chyna, Ukraine. Maybe Trump was telling us that the China virus was really the Chyna virus?

originally posted by: glen200376

originally posted by: tamusan
a reply to: anonentity

At this rate NATO is going to run out of command centers in Ukraine.

Your question should be ,"Why the hell does NATO have command centres in Ukraine?".

My question would be, what evidence is there that there actually might be any?

You do realize that the OP is laughable?

The poster you replied to was being sarcastic, apparently, which should have been obvious?