16 Year Old Honor Student Shot Twice For Ringing Doorbell

a reply to: Nevercompromise

Maybe it was in text, hence his confusion without his phone. He remembered the number but not whether it was terrace or street. In one of the links it states the police arrived at 9:52 I believe. Somewhere between 9:50 and 10. So incident at 9:15-9:30 maybe? If he had to go to three houses for help and then wait for police.

Then you were wrong in claiming it happened after 10 initially?
Why?

And that is another good point.
If he drove there alone where is the car?
If someone drove him where is the driver after he got shot and went to neighbors for help?
This is quickly becoming implausible and looks like a psyop

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: Nevercompromise

Maybe it was in text, hence his confusion without his phone. He remembered the number but not whether it was terrace or street. In one of the links it states the police arrived at 9:52 I believe. Somewhere between 9:50 and 10. So incident at 9:15-9:30 maybe? If he had to go to three houses for help and then wait for police.

a reply to: Nevercompromise

Be careful. Do not question the narrative or you are a RAY-CYST.

originally posted by: ToneDeaf
For REAL,
I just had a cop knock at my door,
He wasn't dress in uniform but in random khaki wear.
He was giving a heads up that they were doing
training in the area.
Maybe when he opened the screen door,
and knocked at the main door I should
have just shot him twice ???
btw he was black and well built, bigger than
this 16 yr old.
Maybe the next car that drives into my driveway,
I'll just shoot pew pew too ????
U.S. has gone over the cliff bananas !!!


______________________________

Not even remotely the same scenario. How often do you open someone's screen door as they open their main door, after you already rang the doorbell?

a reply to: Nevercompromise

You're absolutely right.

As for the race hustler attorney they hired, it immediately makes the story unbelievable. They screwed the kid letting Crump the racist nose his way in.

Evidently the kid drove there. Arrived around 9:50. Cops were there within 2 minutes. Detectives arrived around 10:45.

Yarl told police he parked his car in the driveway, walked to the front door, pressed the doorbell and waited outside the door. He told police he did not pull on the storm door.

Link

A good timeline.....and a quote from the shooter

The police report says Lester was visibly upset and expressed concern for the victim.

Maybe the kids lawyer needs to lead with that statement.....

a reply to: Nevercompromise

My OP stated no time.

But...Maybe because that was reported at the time? When the information came out from the police they stated an exact time.

I mean you can argue with the police if you prefer.

Does someone have a link to it being the kids fingerprints? I did read they found fingerprints on the door or handle but not that the prints were identified.

originally posted by: Cymatic[/post]

Not even remotely the same scenario.
How often do you open someone's screen door as they
open their main door,
after you already rang the doorbell?

Why would a paranoid person have an
unlocked storm-door ???
Storm-doors do have locks !!!
Using the same philosophy, the
gun happy guy is at fault, for
not locking his storm-door !!!
Just as a person would be at fault
for not locking a car-door.
That gas-lighting game works both ways.
fyi the old guy shot through the glass door
because it WAS locked.


but ya . . . . and if there is a law
forcing people to
use certain Pro-Nouns,
I'm sure it won't be long before
there is another law in u.s.a against ringing
doorbells and
protocols on how to knock on doors.
And making it illegal not to own a cell-phone.
Next mandating the 613 'laws'
U.S. has gone over the cliff mentally,
yet americans think to dictate other countries.
U.S. is totally bananas
...same white-zion sell job



_________________

a reply to: frogs453

So you believe the kid and not the old man? He has already stated he saw someone pulling on his door.

originally posted by: matafuchs
Evidently the kid drove there. Arrived around 9:50. Cops were there within 2 minutes. Detectives arrived around 10:45.

Yarl told police he parked his car in the driveway, walked to the front door, pressed the doorbell and waited outside the door. He told police he did not pull on the storm door.

Link

A good timeline.....and a quote from the shooter

The police report says Lester was visibly upset and expressed concern for the victim.

Maybe the kids lawyer needs to lead with that statement.....

Well now wait just a second... According to the "Pay Me, Suckas!" fund his Aunt started up for him, she claims Lester the white man opened the door, looked her nephew directly in the eye, then shot him twice. Then she claims her nephew had to run to 3 different houses before anyone would help him and he was forced to lie on his back with his hands in the air until police arrived.

a reply to: ToneDeaf

Why do you say gun happy? Have you seen the state of the nation? Crime rates even in small towns. They have crack and meth heads also.

If I did not invite someone over, and someone rings my doorbell close to 10 at night, I am not approaching my door without a handgun. Sorry. The world is crazy but this does not make me a gun nut.

I have a 13 y/o daughter, a 16 y/o son and my wife. It is for protection. Now, I have cameras all around including a Ring I could check but still, if someone rings uninvited all of us in the house know what to do. It is sad but it how the world is unfortunately. Personally I want to live to tell my side just in case. You can make your own choice.

a reply to: matafuchs

You believe the old man and not the kid? He stated he didn't.

a reply to: Cymatic

At the same? Not likely. I can see ringing, getting no response, and opening the storm door to knock on the main ... especially if you expected there to be people there expecting you and you had no response.

a reply to: ketsuko

I've done the same ketsuko and had it done at my house. And looking at those street signs in the above link photo. Would be very easy to mistake.

a reply to: frogs453

No. I never said one way or the other. I am waiting and asking questions.

a reply to: matafuchs

Which is why I asked for the link to the identification of fingerprints. Since people are assuming they're his on the handle. Do we know if he grabbed it on his fall after being shot in the head? Suppose we have to wait to find out.

originally posted by: LSU2018
the white man opened the door

If he was so called 'scared'
WHY did he open the door ???
Actually,
it was said that
he shot through the glass
of the LOCKED storm door, shattering
the glass
(hence the injuries of shattered glass
on the kids face)

Obviously misuse of a firearm.
U.S. has gone mentally bananas.



_________________

a reply to: ToneDeaf

You can see on his pictures that he has to have had something like a stroke. I can see him reacting with fearful aggression - fight or flight. Like some little dog that goes haywire berserk.

a reply to: ToneDeaf

He stated he was scared after he opened the door. A racist would have looked through the peep hole and shot the young black youth through the front door not the storm door right? Opening the door shows, to me, no malice. He then saw someone opening the door and he fired.