It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: JinMI
What? I guess 'working' depends on your intention.
I really don't know what about 'happy healthy sustainable self-sufficient communities' could be bad?
So I suggest you take your psychological (sexual?) need of being controlled and punished to your local Domina and keep it out of politics.
Because the goal in politics should always be justice, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
And authoritarianism is always the polar opposite of it.
No matter how you dress it up.
happy healthy sustainable self-sufficient communities
You quoted what I said and still somehow managed to slip a 'safe' in there not mentioned in my post, so I'd say my 'clear lack of logic' you see, is the inability to understand and properly use written language I see in you.
They are all objective terms.
Point is to get rid of overdominating federal national power and reduce that to the absolute necessary,
manage their own administration decentralised power/water supplies etc,
2 in this context also: balanced, just, where everybody has their place and task and appreciation for their contributions, it feels fair, like a 'healthy dynamic' in all interactions.
Even out of the gate you are attempting to federalize decentralization.
It's right there dude.
To fill the gaps of demand and supply we won't suddenly stop using the parts of capitalism which make sense.
Eh?
Even out of the gate you are attempting to federalize decentralization.
I'm talking politics not medical issues, wtf?
Healthy is 1. the absence of diseases,
I can't 'keep up' because I have no idea whatsoever what you try to say with that.
Point is to get rid of overdominating federal national power and reduce that to the absolute necessary,
Sustainable with self-sufficient means those communities produce everything they need for survival for themselves, manage their own administration decentralised power/water supplies etc, so they could continue their MO (sustain) in theory forever.
It's right there dude. I Added the absence of disease because it is the first definition of healthy in every dictionary.
'In this context' could have pointed you to exactly what I mean by it.
How do you think overdomineering federalization happens?
originally posted by: Peeple
It's most of all nobody has the right to rule over any other person (unless in like consenting adults agreeing on a private contract or something similar)
It does not mean the absence of rules, or constant violence or any of that.
originally posted by: ketsuko
People really are the problem with a lot of things along with the power structures we make for ourselves.