Tucker Carlson releases the first wave of videos from Jan 6th

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: litterbaux

Well get ready for tomorrow's thread. Carlson is exposing more bombshells right now !!!!!

Connecting some Pelosi dots!!!! 😁

The news media and Democrats are definitely mad about Tucker airing the Jan 6th footage. In fact, they're irrationally mad, considering the videos are NOT not a "smoking gun" pointing to who/what ordered the deceptions and setups of that day.

i.e. Schumer directly told Murdoch to fire Tucker Carlson from FoxNews.

Thread on the Subject: www.abovetopsecret.com...

Why so angry and afraid?

Here's a great ballbuster . . . . . 😎


Chuck Schumer
@SenSchumer
I was invited on Tucker Carlson’s show.

I will agree to go on after Tucker Carlson admits to his viewers live on air that he has been lying to them about the 2020 elections and about what happened on January 6th.

ALSO, Republican Minority Leader, Senator Mitch McConnell, is ANGRY that Tucker Carlson showed Jan 6, 2021 video footage the Democrat-controlled House didn't want Americans to see!

Republican House Leader Kevin McCarthy and Tucker Carlson tell Mitch McConnell, and everyone else who's angry, whining, and constipated over this....

TOO

DAMN

BAD.

Source: www.npr.org...

Looks like Donald Trump picked a loyal, like-minded friend, when he got to really know and trust Kevin McCarthy in 2017.

a reply to: frogs453

Wait ... where is insurrection in those charges?

I thought there was an insurrection.

a reply to: JinMI

Yea, yea, its everyone elses fault that you remain not only willfully ignorant but a blatant hypocrite.

Yeh just me who remains ignorant.

Are you not forgetting about the rest of your nation that is not maga nuts?

The same dudes who voted Biden in and Trump down.

So about 81 million people or thereabouts.

See they were not rioting and attempting an insurrection on the 6th but sitting watching, just like the rest of the world.

It's your fault you refuse to accept what we all saw happen live on every network to be had.

The FBI has a history of everything from ineptness to political maliciousness.

Documented, here, on this site.

Shame it is not documented via actual factual evidence that you can provide and that would stand up in court, where is that now?

And ATS is a conspiracy website, so there is that.

Now if its hypocrites you are after look no further than your main man in Mar-a-Lago.

You may live in the reality that has been constructed not by you, but FOR you. Ill allow you that. However no one is obligated to participate in that delusion.

You're the one stuck in Qanonaland by my guess pal and deluded as they come.

I see you are screaming words in block capitals again, calm down you will blow a gasket.

a reply to: underpass61

Because about a week leading up to the 6th of January, Trump repeatedly said he wanted his supporters to fight congress over them accepting the electoral college results that clearly showed Joe Biden won the election.

He was egging them on to come to Washington to cause trouble long before he took the podium and called for them to march on the capitol building

As to out of earshot, well you have met social media and smartphones.

Thats how.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Nevercompromise

But I did know for a fact you were dead wrong in the post you made and I responded to

This is what I posted, that you responded to.

Out of all the people who were arrested, which ones were arrested for walking through a door that the Capitol Police were holding open?

No one? That's what I thought.

Can you refute my claim that no one was charged with simple trespassing?

What are the charges against him?
I actually do not know.

He was charged with violent entry and disorderly conduct but wound up pleading guilty to felony obstruction of an official proceeding.
www.bbc.com...

The man who became known as the “QAnon Shaman” pleaded guilty to a federal charge on Friday in connection with his role in the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol. Jacob Anthony Chansley, 34, admitted to a single charge of felony obstruction of an official proceeding.

www.nbcnews.com...

He was sentenced to almost 4 years.

Wonder why Jacob Chansley did a plea deal?

Jacob Anthony Chansley, 33, is due to appear through videolink in federal court in Washington, DC at 11am on Friday for a plea agreement hearing, according to court documents.

The terms of the plea deal were not immediately available. Chansley, who was arrested in January at his home in Phoenix, faced six charges in the case and a potential sentence of up to 28 years.

www.dailymail.co.uk...

Huge legal bills to try to fight the government on up to 28 years in prison?


Or plea four 4 years in prison and cut legal expenses against a federal government with basically unlimited funding to try to convict Jacob Chansley…

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Been looking at this felony charge?

What class felony is “obstruction of an official proceeding” anyway?

Well. Remember when pelosi made a big deal about ripping up the state of the union speech?

I think it would be fair to say she should have been charged with “obstruction of an official proceeding”?

Obstructing an official proceeding

Legal basis

The crime is codified as 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2). The relevant subsection reads:

(c) Whoever corruptly—

(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or
(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
The term "official proceeding" is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1515(a)(1) to include proceedings before federal judges, Congress, federal government agencies, and regulators of insurance businesses.

en.m.wikipedia.org...

Shrugs..

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
a reply to: DupontDeux
Care to actually address the evidence that has been released? We've now seen multiple videos showing the capitol police freely admitting hundreds of protestors into the Capitol -- even holding open the door for them.

How, then, can any charges/convictions for trespassing/etc be justified? If I invite you into my home, and then weeks later call the cops and have you arrested for trespassing, what would your reaction be?

Now, we see that the so-called "Q Shaman" was actually hanging out with the cops! Can you say "plant"? How many other plants were there (besides him & Ray Epps)?

If I care to coment on the new footage beyond saying it is interesting and paint a more nuanced picture, and that I am looking forward to seeing even more ?

No, I don't think I care to, based on some two minutes worth of footage.

With a body of evidence in the tens of thousands of hours of footage, neither you nor I should come to conclusions yet.


The fact that there is some video of me doing nothing illegal is not the same as there is no video of me doing something illegal.

We at the very least have footage of protesters entering through a smashed window. Tucker himself shows that in the segment.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: tanstaafl

So you are suggesting the FBI blew up the world trade center aka the bombing in 93 when a terrorist attack via van bomb detonated?

Was not someone called Ramzi Yousef?

Do you have actual evidence as to FBI involvement?

Some credible links might be nice.

So you are unaware of the Iran Contra testimony that revealed these facts?

Yousef was a pawn. The FBI built the bomb and told him where to plant it.

The FBI claimed it was a sting, but that someone made a mistake and failed to stop them in time.

A mistake was made, but it wasn't failing to stop him, it was that the morons who parked the van parked it in the wrong place.

a reply to: tanstaafl

The Iran contra testimony proved the FBI blew up the world trade center?

Some actual tangible facts and evidence to support the claim please.

Some links might be nice?

It's your fault you refuse to accept what we all saw happen live on every network to be had.

a reply to: andy06shake

I saw a group of Maga, led by Ray Epps, protesting and going after a 3 ft metal fence, shaking it and Capitol police on the other side of the "fence" pushing it while just over to the left about a 25 yards away the Capitol police were opening doors and allowing people in the capital building.

What a hoax, it was all a set up. Let me put on a pot of coffee and we can sit down and talk about it.
They pulled another fast one on all of us but more and more we are seeing the bs and its all coming to a boiling point. Get on the right side of history andy.

originally posted by: WhatItIs
a reply to: Sookiechacha
Wonder why Jacob Chansley did a plea deal?
...
Huge legal bills to try to fight the government on up to 28 years in prison?

Or plea four 4 years in prison and cut legal expenses against a federal government with basically unlimited funding to try to convict Jacob Chansley…

Also, how long had/have he/all of them been sitting in jail having his/their Rights violated (solitary confinement, speedy trial, etc)?

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe

It's your fault you refuse to accept what we all saw happen live on every network to be had.

a reply to: andy06shake

I saw a group of Maga, led by Ray Epps, protesting and going after a 3 ft metal fence, shaking it and Capitol police on the other side of the "fence" pushing it while just over to the left about a 25 yards away the Capitol police were opening doors and allowing people in the capital building.

No one has said there weren't a few non FBI idiots engaging in violence and vandalism, indeed there were.

The problem is, the MSM is pretending that everyone was doing so, when they know for a fact that isn't true.

Again, the radical leftist MSM is reversing the narrative - labeling the (actually) mostly peaceful protest at the capital that day as an insurrection, after labeling the (actually) mostly violent and deadly riots over the summer of 2020 as 'mostly peaceful'.

And anyone who supports this narrative is (actually) suffering from mass formation psychosis as a result of their willing and intentional faith in their masters in their government and the MSM.

Own it. Get help.

a reply to: tanstaafl

Cases have been delayed at the request of the defendants due to the sheer amount of evidence they have to go through. Did you not actually read the article I posted previously?

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: tanstaafl

Can't see why when what we saw happen live on TV was indeed a failed insurrection.

Said the guy who has no clue what an insurrection looks like.

Maybe you should just accept what happened was completely unacceptable and move along with your life.

Depends on what you mean by 'unacceptable'.

Do you mean that whoever engaged in it deserves the death penalty? Or punishment in accordance with and relative to their actual 'crimes'? 'What-about-ism' those who engaged in the mostly violent riots of the summer of 2020?

You are, as usual, totally ignoring the fact that I - and everyone else I've seen trying to talk sense to numb-nuts - have always accepted and am/are fully aware that there was some violence and vandalism that was engaged in by a relatively (to the size of the crowd that was actually there) small group of people, and I/we have always maintained and agreed that that was unacceptable. In fact, we were pissed that these people allowed themselves to be tricked into acting out by the Capital Police/Antifa/FBI plants like Unknown-masked-guy-breaking-the-window/John Sullivan/Ray Epps that were there engaging in the violence themselves, or just egging them on.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

C'mon, don't you realize that what the violent and seditionist jailed people are going through is all new and just because they are J6 people? Conditions and processes for jailed people have always been a cake walk. We've never heard of long wait times to trial, people in solitary, and horrific conditions before. I mean well if we ignore the fact that prisoners have been suing the DC jail since the late 70s. And ignore the fact that often minorities have complained about similar things for years.

I'm sure Patriots and Maga will get behind prison reform now though, right? For all people?

a reply to: frogs453

It really is interesting to see all the people that were silent/celebrating the attempted railroading of the J20 defendants suddenly having a strong opinion on DC's justice system.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: tanstaafl
Ah, great defense as to why ultimately the President chose not to protect the Capitol.

Because that is a proven lie that only those under the delusion of the mass formation psychosis being perpetrated by their obligate masters. Unlike Joe Biden Obama, Trump is not a dictator - he offered thousands of National Guard troops the day before the event, but he could not force them, and was directly opposed by the radical leftist DC Mayor and those in charge of the actual Capital Security and Police - Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer.

If anyone is to blame for what happened, it is Chuck and Nancy (and their RINO counterparts).

Both before and during the mayhem. Pretty sure 5000 law enforcement fully equipped with air support could have stopped the yahoo's from dragging officers out and beating them.

Agreed. So the logical questions to ask would be - why was the Capital Police staff reduced to HALF that day? Why did Nancy and Chuck and the DC Mayor all REFUSE the National Guard protection (10,000+ if I remember correctly) offered up by Trump and his DOD?

So, why don't you ask the logical questions, instead of regurgitate MSM lies?

I'm sure you believe the current President would be responsible in just such a case.

Seriously? He would have laid a trap and we would now be discussing the mass suicides of everyone there that day.

But yeah I'm on drugs. That explains it.

It is one of the few rational explanations that would explain it. Or, you're just batsnip crazy.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

You know how that goes. Just Comply and Back The Blue, until it affects you. The cops never kettle, pepper spray peaceful protesters, until affects you. Criminals get what they deserve, until it affects you.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: tanstaafl

By its very nature, some security footage can't be shown. It would show personal things going on that aren't relevant to our concerns.

I disagree. Anything that goes on within the view of those security cameras is going on in the People's House and is potentially relevant. If they don't want it to be publicly available, it should not be monitored by public security cameras.

Example: SCIFs. Nothing that goes on inside a SCIF shoud be publicly available, because they aren't monitored by the normal security systems. I'm sure they are monitored too, but by an extremely secure system that was installed under and is contrloled by laws governing the handling of Confidential+ information.

Everything else should be made available. Not only that, it should all be stored on a publicly available system accessible to anyone over the internet.

Again - it is Our House.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: tanstaafl

Well he was the guy featured in OP's video. Him and Josh Hawley. Did you watch the vid?

I know.

My comments were general in nature and not limited to horny guy.

Did you bother to read them before responding TO them?

Why?

Because it is Our House, and it and everything inside them is paid for by monet stolen from me, my family, my friends, and every other hard working extortion paying man and woman in this country.

To prove what?

To prove that no evidence was hidden/covered up.