Tucker Carlson releases the first wave of videos from Jan 6th

It's pretty eye opening when you think about how much big media has influence over your perception of reality.

How many people do you know that bought into this "insurrection" hook, line and sinker? Were they also the ones that put a mask on and lined up for experimental injections?

I think this experiment on Stockholm syndrome went well. You're better off siding with your captors than resisting. What's next?

a reply to: litterbaux

At the end of the day, it won't matter what is on the video. People who believe the Jan. 6th narrative won't change their minds.

a reply to: litterbaux

The mascot of the "insurrection" is strangely dressed in Molech looking gear. He also protested on the side of antifa prior to the so called "insurrection." And after finding out he is ex-military it makes perfect sense to use him for their agenda.

I honestly believe and have a strong gut feeling this was a ritual. If I can find the video and articles about it, I'll post them here. I think it was during the summer, Portland and a bunch of other cities were being rioted in.

FOX news also tells half-truths like all the other mainstream media organizations. I hope this wakes people up to start really digging and researching as much as possible.

originally posted by: Edumakated
a reply to: litterbaux

At the end of the day, it won't matter what is on the video. People who believe the Jan. 6th narrative won't change their minds.

Sadly, this is true.

There is almost no known way of breaking people out of the stockholm sydrome or mass psychosis that's going on. People were so scared, I mean, really scared. This operation came from the top, you will never lead me to believe this was organic when I seen with my two lying eyes the fear was present on the TV 24/7.

Do I fault the people that fell for it? NOPE. Do I think people are stupid for falling for it? NOPE.

a reply to: TooMuchTimeAndResearch

To give more context to your claim. Here's the wiki of Moloch.

Moloch

The Bible strongly condemns practices which are associated with Moloch, practices which appear to have included child sacrifice.

It's interesting that the Wiki has this as one of the first lines of context.

originally posted by: Edumakated
a reply to: litterbaux

At the end of the day, it won't matter what is on the video. People who believe the Jan. 6th narrative won't change their minds.

Indeed.

And when the eventual settlements come, it wont be out of the pockets of the offenders.

Itll be on the backs of taxpayers....

a reply to: litterbaux

LOL @ him even trying to spin this to a sympathetic crowd. Carlson really digging in the dumps on this one.

There's nothing else for him to really do. Everyone who watches this will like it because that's the reason they watched it. Here you are, broadcasting it like see! it wasnt bad at all, its the liberals and the media in cahoots making it seem like it was bad.

A grand conspiracy, yeah. They stole the election then painted this picture. He's trying too hard, Carlson, to spin this after being given exclusive access to this footage from Kevin McCarthy to cherry pick all the scenes he likes.

Not sure if sad or scary that he's good at doing this, but only people who want to believe him will. Like you, the people who gave you stars, replied to this, he made it for you guys. He has to entertain to have a job. It looks like you enjoyed it.

a reply to: litterbaux

I will never forget the posters here on ATS that took sadistic joy in openly mocking the death of Ashley Babbitt.

You know who you are.




Let the pendulum swing on the stolen election, the deadly vax, the fake insurrection, the Ukraine false narrative, the Epstein saga... All of it!


Before they dazzle us with their fake ufo invasion.

a reply to: litterbaux

Tucker Carlson releases the first wave of videos from Jan 6th

The power of cherry picking is great - so let us by the same token remind ourselves that Tucker too does that.

But yeah, these pictures sure paints a more nuanced picture.

I look forward to seeing more.

a reply to: Thrumbo

So, you're ok with the Democrats hiding the full evidence ? They cherry picked that footage to show Jan 6 in the worst possible light. They refused to let Republicans on the committee just for that purpose. Please don't say there were Republicans because Cheney and Kinzinger don't count.

Whatever the truth may be, the American people deserve the full story, not just the Democrat version of the truth.

a reply to: litterbaux

Fare enough but Tucker Carlson doesn't do news, he does opinion pieces.

a reply to: DAVID64
What full evidence? We know the cops inside the Capitol felt outnumbered and tried not to escalate the situation. You can find the investigation to that online. You can find that 30 or so Capitol cops were investigated,suspended and/or disciplined for their actions that day, and you can find out that defense teams, including Chansleys had access to this video for their defense.

Remember Tucker and the crew will tell you things to rile you up that they do not believe themselves. You can find the hosts own words in the Dominion filing and the previous law suit in which it was determined Tuckers show is for entertainment only. Not a news show.

a reply to: frogs453

We need the full story. Good or bad. Why are the Democrats having a hissy fit over this being released ? What's in there they don't want seen ?

a reply to: DAVID64

I think they just want it to be released to other networks bar Fox which to my knowledge has yet to take place.

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: frogs453

We need the full story. Good or bad. Why are the Democrats having a hissy fit over this being released ? What's in there they don't want seen ?

It's not about what is seen. We know this, we've seen this. Why did Tucker show only this with Chansley? Why not him being let in by the man who broke a window to enter the building? Why show Sicknick walking? We know he was chemical sprayed by a Patriot and died the next day. Why give this to Tucker who is well documented in court to not being truthful?

a reply to: DupontDeux
Care to actually address the evidence that has been released? We've now seen multiple videos showing the capitol police freely admitting hundreds of protestors into the Capitol -- even holding open the door for them.

How, then, can any charges/convictions for trespassing/etc be justified? If I invite you into my home, and then weeks later call the cops and have you arrested for trespassing, what would your reaction be?

Now, we see that the so-called "Q Shaman" was actually hanging out with the cops! Can you say "plant"? How many other plants were there (besides him & Ray Epps)?

originally posted by: frogs453

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: frogs453

We need the full story. Good or bad. Why are the Democrats having a hissy fit over this being released ? What's in there they don't want seen ?

It's not about what is seen. We know this, we've seen this. Why did Tucker show only this with Chansley? Why not him going through the broken door? Why show Sicknick walking? We know he was chemical sprayed by a Patriot and died the next day. Why give this to Tucker who is well documented in court to not being truthful?

why focus on the messenger? why not discuss the facts? did you watch the video? Or did you just whine about mean old Tucker?

a reply to: frogs453

Why give this to Tucker who is well documented in court to not being truthful?

Can you point to any MSM who are ?

I'm not saying any of this will change the verdict on those found guilty or get them out of this. What I want to see is the other side of it, not just what the Democrats wanted us to see.
What's so bad about wanting to get both sides of the story ?

a reply to: network dude

Who's whining about Tucker. That's the truth about Tucker. I've already addressed the cops who were investigated/diciplined/suspended. I've already addressed that other cops felt de-escalating the situation was the only way to go as they were vastly outnumbered and any trying to arrest or detain would have turned violent and bad for them. Do you know why Tucker chose not to show Chansley outside pushing against the police line that eventually broke into the Capitol? Why they didn't show the rioter who broke the window and let them in?

Why is it we are just now seeing all this for the first time?
Original narrative is not the truth is why.

originally posted by: frogs453

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: frogs453

We need the full story. Good or bad. Why are the Democrats having a hissy fit over this being released ? What's in there they don't want seen ?

It's not about what is seen. We know this, we've seen this. Why did Tucker show only this with Chansley? Why not him going through the broken door? Why show Sicknick walking? We know he was chemical sprayed by a Patriot and died the next day. Why give this to Tucker who is well documented in court to not being truthful?