It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DevotedResearcher
originally posted by: bastion
That's not quite true; the Head of State has immunity from some crimes . . .
Is "Head of State" synonymous with "the Crown"?
And which crimes exactly?
originally posted by: Nevercompromise
Ok I see you are reading and making adjustments.
p
originally posted by: DevotedResearcher
originally posted by: Nevercompromise
A bankruptcy expert was hired...and he has a bloodline.
"Bloodline" is a key word for me.
If we the people put any credence whatsoever in the claim of royalty, we can blame ourselves for our woes.
Now that America is on the brink of falling into a total lack of personal sovereignty for any individual, through the social credit score that will come with Central Bank Digital Currencies, we'd best get our act together.
No one is going to come save us.
originally posted by: Nevercompromise
The point about the bloodline is that the so called royals are imposters to the throne of David.
originally posted by: DevotedResearcher
originally posted by: Nevercompromise
The point about the bloodline is that the so called royals are imposters to the throne of David.
That is a whole different can of worms.
Personally, I have a big issue with religion, as well.
Whole different topic.
originally posted by: DevotedResearcher
a reply to: Nevercompromise
Wow.
Have you started any threads on this?
originally posted by: Nevercompromise
I always suspected he was in the game in a very significant way.
www.bitchute.com...
originally posted by: DevotedResearcher
A very important point: In actuality, believe it or not, the U.S. Bill of Rights doesn't apply to Washington, D.C.
qintel.pro...
www.bitchute.com...
originally posted by: Nevercompromise
The point about the bloodline is that the so called royals are imposters to the throne of David.
originally posted by: Nothin
a reply to: Nevercompromise
Hi. It is my pleasure to give you the first star for that post.
But still unsure of anything, because it's all so purposely contrived to be confusing.
Are you alluding to Admiralty-Law™, and/or those American guys that say that they are the rightful owners of the flag of the USA™ ?
Like self-declared Post-Master™ of the World™ : Russell-Jay: Gould!™ ?
originally posted by: Nothin
a reply to: Nevercompromise
Thanks for your reply.
Sorry you lost your text, it happens to all of us, sometimes.
Will go digging for the vid with another fellow, who explains all of the context of those two you mentioned, and Admiralty-Law™.
Sorry OP if you feel this is off-topic, but my instincts tell me that we are still on-topic.