America Has Been Captured by the British Empire

This thread is inspired by a video posted on the free speech platform Rumble by former Marine and J6 political prisoner—released after 619 days—Pete Santilli.

The guest is Austin Steinbart of the website QINTELPRO Geopolitical Intelligence Archive.

The title of this video aligns with my recent learning that the United States has not really been a sovereign country, as we thought, since the Revolutionary War.

Austin Steinbart is actively trying to make the Bill of Rights a reality, as is Pete Santilli.

The interview is 2 hours 45 minutes long.

A screenshot and link:

The Pete Santilli Show

Correct. The rothchilds and royal family are at the top of the pyramid. They pull the strings of the national security state.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
. . . royal family . . . They pull the strings of the national security state.

What percentage of Brits would you surmise know this?

a reply to: DevotedResearcher

That is my understanding also. Around the beginning of the plandemic, I listened to several podcasts stating this was the British Empires effort to finalize their control of the US, using China as their strong man. I have no way to find those speakers again. I'm glad there are others still talking about it. F' the empire! We know who you are.

a reply to: DevotedResearcher

Yes Brexit highlighted this but no one talks about the steps taken and unelected officials gaining power.

The "Founding Fathers" were freemasons. The blueprint for America was designed by the powers that be hundreds of years before the "Independence war". All the revolutions in this world were manufactured events. The Continental Army was a sort of Black Lives Matters movement. Your American flag is blue, red, and white. Just like the Union Jack flag. These red, white and blue are the colors of the crowns of ancient Egypt. There is no such thing as a "British Empire". The empire that rule this planet is GLOBAL. The city of London is simply the financial investment center of the empire. The rest of the UK is as enslaved as the rest of the world.

a reply to: DevotedResearcher

i've had my suspicions about this since i read a story about queen elizabeth cutting a interview / function/ or something short several years ago, if i recall correctly there is a thread here about it.

reason she gave, she said she had to go and sign the U.S. social security agreement.

now i know what the official reason given is, but what kinda really bugs me is the fact that according to my understanding the monarchy of the uk is just a figure head. so why are they still signing agreements between the U.S. and the UK?

could it be that it goes back to the days of chartered trading companies and the thrown still gets a cut which comes out of social security .

just why does basically a figure head still sign agreements with the U.S ? things that make you say hmmm.

originally posted by: DevotedResearcher

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
. . . royal family . . . They pull the strings of the national security state.

What percentage of Brits would you surmise know this?

0%?

A screenshot:



If I understood correctly, Austin Steinbart just recommended, on Amazon Prime, The Peripheral, which I guess is this:

The Peripheral centers on Flynne Fisher, a woman trying to hold together the pieces of her broken family in a forgotten corner of tomorrow's America. Flynne is smart, ambitious, and doomed. She has no future. Until the future comes calling for her. The Peripheral is master storyteller William Gibson’s dazzling, hallucinatory glimpse into the fate of mankind — and what lies beyond.

www.amazon.com...

This is in the context of what is "Quantum"? Well, the Feds have a website for it: National Quantum Initiative.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
Correct. The rothchilds and royal family are at the top of the pyramid. They pull the strings of the national security state.

Why not ?
They own the world .

a reply to: DevotedResearcher

Please tread carefully on these grounds.

And consider -- very seriously consider -- that it's exactly the opposite... that it's the USA that captured the British. Perhaps consider it the price the British paid for not speaking German today.

The British royal family has no power... the British monarch has only soft power (diplomacy).

There's a growing-- and seemingly coordinated effort -- to take down Britain's Constitutional Monarchy.

I don't trust it. At all.

a reply to: Boadicea

The British royal family has no power.

The Monarchy has the power to remove a Prime Minister if they so wish.

The Austrlaian Prime Minister Gough Whitlam removed from office in 1975 on the authority of Queen Elizabeth II.

a reply to: ltrz2025

Some scholars believe The United States was the best gift The East India Company ever got 😎

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: ltrz2025

Some scholars believe The United States was the best gift The East India Company ever got 😎

The same people who owned the East India Company is the same people who helped found the USA. The templar's secret was the existence of the American continent....

a reply to: DevotedResearcher

I have that book; it's very good. In a future world, they have created/coded a kind of parallel world that takes place in the past. The past and future worlds collide and are equally real. In the future world people can inhabit peripherals, that project their consciousness into a physical body that is designed, and operates in the 'past' in this other world. it's quantum entanglement stuff that can get confusing.

a reply to: alldaylong

Funny you bring that up... "The Dismissal". I was reading up on it yesterday to refresh my recollection. That was quite the mess all the way around! I still very much doubt we know everything...

So your point is well taken. But the Queen wasn't the driving force nor the final judge. It was a group effort and I'm not sure how much of a choice the Queen actually had. I don't want to minimize her role or fall back on "well she had to heed the counsel of the Prime Minister." But neither am I sure she wielded anything more than the soft power I spoke of before.

I do see the problem with removing a duly elected official tho. At the same time, sometimes elected officials NEED to be removed. It's tough.

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: DevotedResearcher

Please tread carefully on these grounds.

And consider -- very seriously consider -- that it's exactly the opposite... that it's the USA that captured the British. Perhaps consider it the price the British paid for not speaking German today.

The British royal family has no power... the British monarch has only soft power (diplomacy).

There's a growing-- and seemingly coordinated effort -- to take down Britain's Constitutional Monarchy.

I don't trust it. At all.

It's neither American or British...it's internationalists with the WEF psycho group. They do not care one bit for the sovereignty of any nation. The royals are at the center of all this. Money = power....the royals certainly do have power and a lot of it.

a reply to: DevotedResearcher

ha:

“As new technologies continue to evolve, we’ll work together with our democratic partners to ensure that new advances in areas from biotechnology, to quantum computing, 5G, artificial intelligence, and more are used to lift people up, to solve problems, and advance human freedom” – President Biden

hahahaha

a reply to: Sparkymedic

It's neither American or British...it's internationalists with the WEF psycho group. They do not care one bit for the sovereignty of any nation.

Fair enough and true enough.

The royals are at the center of all this. Money = power....the royals certainly do have power and a lot of it.

Yes, money provides soft power... it does not provide hard political power. And I could say that the monarch's wealth (and Constitutional status) provides the power of independence and therefore protection from political factions. And that would be quite the problem for the tyrants who want to rule the world.

But lets also be clear that in her lifetime, Queen Elizabeth did exactly the opposite. With grace and dignity. She gave those nations choosing independence her blessings and her support thru The Commonwealth.

Obviously, necessary and proper restrictions must be placed upon the monarch's power and authority, but without tying their hands to do their royal duty: serve the people and nation's best interests and greater good.