America Has Been Captured by the British Empire

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: DevotedResearcher

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
. . . royal family . . . They pull the strings of the national security state.

What percentage of Brits would you surmise know this?

0%?

Wrong.

Do not speak for others.

Please.

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: DevotedResearcher

Please tread carefully on these grounds.

And consider -- very seriously consider -- that it's exactly the opposite... that it's the USA that captured the British. Perhaps consider it the price the British paid for not speaking German today.

The British royal family has no power... the British monarch has only soft power (diplomacy).

There's a growing-- and seemingly coordinated effort -- to take down Britain's Constitutional Monarchy.

I don't trust it. At all.

Very powerful and bewildering post.

Powerful because you strongly advise to tread lightly. This sounds more dangerous than Dave Chappelle.

Bewildering because Britain's Constitutional Monarchy just brutalized Canada and Australia and the UK.

a reply to: DevotedResearcher

I was under suspicion they retook control after they burned down the White House in 1812. More modern though, the surviving Nazis of Ww2 that went to work for UK and USA began the WEF as a way to infiltrate all western governments. This would be their fictional manifestation from an old movie.
Seems ominously foretelling Don't it?

a reply to: nerbot

Notice there was a question mark there.

What would you say?

A screenshot:

rumble.com...

Mr. Steinbart is talking about his iniative to bring we the people together in the United States.

I might suggest the colonial charters for Virginia and Massachusetts colonies may still be in effect and always have. Everything has been a political shell game since the Pilgrims landed and even before.

originally posted by: DevotedResearcher
The guest is Austin Steinbart of the website QINTELPRO Geopolitical Intelligence Archive.

Proposal

Crisis in America

The United States is a great country, with great people, great landscape, and vast natural resources. But we have an irredeemably corrupt government! A government that is completely captured by ruthless oligarchs, and rogue intelligence agencies. A government that utterly ignores the Constitution. A government that is too corrupt to function. And a government that is totally unaware of the fact that our country is on the brink of collapsing. Any attempts to correct our course or fix our problems democratically within the current system are thwarted. Politicians are blackmailed. Elections are rigged. Legitimate political activists are aggressively targeted by the crooked FBI. So where do we go from here? How do we save our country? This proposal seeks to answer that question. . .

a reply to: DevotedResearcher

Been a while since I've seen one of these threads. They used to be a quite common occurrence years ago....but people got bored with thoroughly debunking the same old arguments.

I've got no doubt the UK should rule the world, but in the interests of good old fashioned British fair play we've decided to let other nations having a go at #ing the world up.....seems they are doing a pretty good job of it.

😉🤣

qintel.pro...

Another interview of Austin Steinbart about his plan to save what is really a corporation at present, America:

www.bitchute.com...

originally posted by: DevotedResearcher
Another interview of Austin Steinbart about his plan to save what is really a corporation at present, America . . .

A very important point: In actuality, believe it or not, the U.S. Bill of Rights doesn't apply to Washington, D.C.

This is the same principle as the City of London enclave within London, England.

originally posted by: DevotedResearcher
Another interview of Austin Steinbart about his plan to save what is really a corporation at present, America . . .

Apparently, the Crown has legal immunity for any crime.



There should be no such thing as "royalty." It is a fiction we the people worldwide should do away with. Refuse to curtsy, both literally and figuaratively.

originally posted by: DevotedResearcher

originally posted by: DevotedResearcher
Another interview of Austin Steinbart about his plan to save what is really a corporation at present, America . . .

Apparently, the Crown has legal immunity for any crime.

There should be no such thing as "royalty." It is a fiction we the people worldwide should do away with. Refuse to curtsy, both literally and figuaratively.

That's not quite true; the Head of State has immunity from some crimes unless explicitly stated which I think is the same/very similar to the US system, with the US system granting far more immunity.

Concepts like the Divine Right of Kings were scrappedin the UK before the US existed.

Parliament has the authority to state what laws apply to the Monarch as a private citizen - the Monarch only has ceremonial and non-political powers now - all the powers they had 700+ years ago have been transfered to Parliament over the centuries.

a reply to: bastion

That's not quite true; the Head of State has immunity from some crimes

The Monarch cannot be prosecuted for ANY CRIME. They have complete immunity.

Should Queen Elizabeth ever commit a crime, the term 'sovereign immunity' will really come to the fore. Sovereign immunity means that as head of the state Queen Elizabeth 'cannot commit a legal wrong and is immune from civil suit or criminal prosecution'.
As well as this, the Queen also benefits from diplomatic immunity, meaning she can commit a crime just about anywhere in the world and get away with it! The sovereign immunity that the Queen benefits from even goes so far as to ensure that she cannot be subject to any civil proceedings, so she can't be sued.
As well as this she cannot be interviewed by the police and would never have to testify in court should that be her wish. The Queen's word in the United Kingdom is law. She could conceivably walk into any shop in the whole of Britain and loot the place should she wish. Simply put, the Queen is above all authority and must surely be one of the most powerful people on earth for that fact alone

britishheritage.com...

originally posted by: bastion
That's not quite true; the Head of State has immunity from some crimes . . .

Is "Head of State" synonymous with "the Crown"?

And which crimes exactly?

a reply to: alldaylong

That's not prevented us from chopping a King's head off and removing several other Monarch's before.

originally posted by: DevotedResearcher
Another interview of Austin Steinbart about his plan to save what is really a corporation at present, America . . .

Re. "the Crown corporation" and how it impacts America:

1. Through our legal system—In 1783, British shareholders holding rights to land & resources could maintain those rights that they had through the companies that brought colonists to America in the first place. When those companies dissolved, the owned land & resources transferred to them via. a treaty our government agreed to.

2. America's national bank got bought up by associates of the Crown. Was dissolved in 1811—one of the reasons for the War of 1812.

3. Our legal system uses the term "Esquire" for lawyers, which actually means Title of Nobility. Our legal system is centered in the City of London.

Good thread.
I am not sure you are recognizing what the "crown" is.
The crown is not the royalty per SE.
It is the corporation represented by the empire of the City
Washington D.C.(military arm), the city of London (banking and legal), and Vatican city(religious).
The pope and black pope have the highest authority within the Crown.
This is all about commerce and the laws of the sea. (U.C.C.)

Their charter for the USA inc. ended 1999 where they intended to purchase USA inc. after it's 3rd bankruptcy but....but....but...

A bankruptcy expert was hired...and he has a bloodline.
The Empire of the City (corporation) is defeated.
New trade agreements and Treaties signed and now effective.

originally posted by: DevotedResearcher

originally posted by: bastion
That's not quite true; the Head of State has immunity from some crimes . . .

Is "Head of State" synonymous with "the Crown"?

And which crimes exactly?

originally posted by: DevotedResearcher

originally posted by: DevotedResearcher
Another interview of Austin Steinbart about his plan to save what is really a corporation at present, America . . .

Re. "the Crown corporation" and how it impacts America:

1. Through our legal system—In 1783, British shareholders holding rights to land & resources could maintain those rights that they had through the companies that brought colonists to America in the first place. When those companies dissolved, the owned land & resources transferred to them via. a treaty our government agreed to.

2. America's national bank got bought up by associates of the Crown. Was dissolved in 1811—one of the reasons for the War of 1812.

3. Our legal system uses the term "Esquire" for lawyers, which actually means Title of Nobility. Our legal system is centered in the City of London.

Ok I see you are reading and making adjustments.
I posted before I read this.
The act of England of 1871 is when the USA inc. was chartered. It was ratified by Congress in 1876.
They give these charters for 99 years and there was a 24 year extension.
We have been in limbo since then with rogue actors positioning themselves for oligarch powers. We are neither a republic nor corporation for over 20 years now.
We are witnessing the reformation of our Republic of States, if we can keep it.

originally posted by: Nevercompromise
A bankruptcy expert was hired...and he has a bloodline.

"Bloodline" is a key word for me.

If we the people put any credence whatsoever in the claim of royalty, we can blame ourselves for our woes.

Now that America is on the brink of falling into a total lack of personal sovereignty for any individual, through the social credit score that will come with Central Bank Digital Currencies, we'd best get our act together.

No one is going to come save us.