U.S. shoots down car-sized unidentified object flying above Alaska

EMERGENCY CONSPIRACY WATCH HAS THREE DAYS REMAINING, AND WE'RE BACK TO NORMAL.

AS OF NOW, NO ALIENS, RUSSIANS, OR CHINESE OTHER THAN THE FIRST BALLOON HAVE BEEN DETECTED.
EMERGENCY LEVEL 5 GOES DOWN TO 2

THIS IS THE CHILL-OUT LEVEL

The mainstream media hype is getting bolder….in its headline…..perhaps it’s a way of drawing Biden out, so he’ll say something.

Q&A was previously presented…

Standard White House briefing @ 1pm ET


They are including the Chinese balloon as 1 of the 4 objects….

👽

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
The mainstream media hype is getting bolder….in its headline…..perhaps it’s a way of drawing Biden out, so he’ll say something...👽

Seems like General VanHerck hasn't yet got the memo/talking points.

And then a second, and then a third, and a fourth.

This is getting very Chinese feeling. Like certain writers have a literary tell, China has a "things they do to provoke" tell.

So what's their goal?

Does China want the USA to admit what they shot down?

Like, "Ha Ha, we made you be transparent about the technology you withhold from your own citizens."

They've officially call us out for that, so that seems like something China would do.

Shapes previously identified so far as …..Cylindrical and Octagon
👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Welp... so much for that. Going with balloons. Balloons shaped like polygons. Next Gen Chinese Fire Lanterns. China has a bunch of parade balloons to screw with our borders apparently.

Start from minute 02:00

“Objects” White House Briefing for Monday 2/13/23 includes Q&A after the briefing….



Honorably, mentions “UAP’s …Unidentified Aerial Phenomena”

👽

Moments ago…..





Why were the objects taken down?

👽

White House Addresses Speculation That Aerial Objects May Be Extraterrestrial

LINK

Points

Point: If they claim they don’t know what they shot down, then how can they eliminate anything? How can they say it isn’t alien?

Point: Of course, we UFO information buffs KNOW it’s not alien because we know they can’t shoot down an alien craft according to all the information we have gathered over the decades. When they tried to do that, invariably, the UFOs fly away from them like flash lightning, leaving them in the dust.

Point: So, they have to prevaricate and illogically deny something they can’t deny logically because of the above premise; how can they eliminate anything if they don’t know what it is?

Point. They don’t want to come out and say: WE KNOW ITS NOT ALIEN BECAUSE WE HAVE NEVER BEEN ABLE TO SHOOT ALIEN CRAFTS FORM OUR SKYS.

Point: They can't leave an abstract paranormal possibility that it may be aliens in the public mind.

Speculative conclusion:
If the shootdowns were a psyop or what I call a PsyCop (mass psychological operation), then we may know the point: To infer in the public mind that they can shoot down alien crafts.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

What a joke, as if the intelligence and counter-intelligence community is going to reveal anything about it! If they do, will anyone trust them? He completely deflected his obligation to know what these things are.

originally posted by: Degradation33
And then a second, and then a third, and a fourth.

This is getting very Chinese feeling. Like certain writers have a literary tell, China has a "things they do to provoke" tell.

So what's their goal?

Does China want the USA to admit what they shot down?

Like, "Ha Ha, we made you be transparent about the technology you withhold from your own citizens."

They've officially call us out for that, so that seems like something China would do.

That would be really stupid. "Hey, we exposed you. Now you need to tell your citizens what you can do"
A regular sane citizen: "Okay... and so what?"

I'm just wondering what "car-sized" means?

Uno size or "American Dream" length?
www.guinnessworldrecords.com...

I guess modern journalists can't do metrics or measurements anymore.

And I saw the alien, and he was as tall as my tree.

You know, my tallest bonsai.

originally posted by: halfoldman
I'm just wondering what "car-sized" means?

Uno size or "American Dream" length?
www.guinnessworldrecords.com...

I guess modern journalists can't do metrics or measurements anymore.

And I saw the alien, and he was as tall as my tree.

You know, my tallest bonsai.

I’ve wondered beyond what the size is in HxWxL of the Alaska object.

Only because “car-sized” is not a description of shape design.

The Alaska object was not given a, or presented… as a shape, only as a dimension….. whearas the other two objects were.

So then ….we have the following Shapes

1) Alaska - ????
2) Canada - Cylindrical
3) Lake Huron - Octagonal

Only once earlier on in the reporting, one of the news outlets mentioned like a 55 gallon drum (which could be considered cylindrical, I suppose) but then that was it. From then on, continued news stories only ever mention “car-sized” for the Alaska object not the shape.

Does anyone know what the shape is of the Alaska object? give reference link where’s shape is mentioned, if possible.

👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1


I remember initial reports referring to the Alaska object as 'cigar shaped", but I am unable to find them. The only other thing about the Alaska object I've read is that it was the one that apparently interfered with pilot instruments.

originally posted by: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
a reply to: Ophiuchus1


I remember initial reports referring to the Alaska object as 'cigar shaped", but I am unable to find them. The only other thing about the Alaska object I've read is that it was the one that apparently interfered with pilot instruments.

Thx

Cigar Shapes are cylindrical except for the diameters taper down at the ends somewhat



Anyone else……heard the same or different about the Alaska object shape?

So far

1) 55 gal drum
2) Cigar Shaped

👽

Someone with gonad’s…..speaks up…about what the classified meeting concerning the objects was about.

Everyone wants answers on the objects flying over the United States. Today Members of Congress finally got more info from senior military officials," he said. "We still don’t know what these other 3 objects were. We’re calling them unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs.)"

Source: Texas Rep Dan Crenshaw gives insight into White House briefing to Congress on unidentified objects shot down

Also….. Crenshaw Twitter Feed

The UAPs were in FAA commercial zones and had no signals or navigation lights. The first two UAPs were smaller, the size of an ATV, and harder to detect. The third resembled a balloon, and was easier for the radar to pick up.

Initially at the begin of these object’s saga, I had mentioned in my OP ….why weren’t they calling the objects for what they were ……UAP’s ….by their own new ish policy and procedures……

Finally! Better late than never.

I find it interesting that…….if we shot Sidwinders at objects the “size” of ATV’s ……wouldn’t at that size….those objects be obliterated by the high altitude explosive impact…….virtually leaving only tiny bits and pieces of debris falling and widely spreading over large areas of land and water below? In other words, there may be nothing left to discern of the objects… to find.

👽

Yeah, I wondered that also. UFO just seamed tastier in the news I guess than UAP. Most people haven't heard of the new UAP label.

a reply to: peaceinoutz

"Speculative conclusion:
If the shootdowns were a psyop or what I call a PsyCop (mass psychological operation), then we may know the point: To infer in the public mind that they can shoot down alien crafts."

I don't have a conclusion yet however former Psyops involving cylindrical crafts tended to be esoteric.
This one was envisioned as shared vision of radius-ed sections in the inter-dimensional Jungian.



X-files may have explored a similar psi-op phenomena in "Die Hand Die Verletzt" episode.

Its something J Allen Hynek would have been interested in but he came and went with Halley's Comet like Mark Twain.

Our senior US intelligence is looking at this as a threat from China(today).
China might be targeting the old timers retired from the CIA with their AtlantiC&Us electric motor manufacturing plant.
Big difference between C4 and C2 608 bearing performance.

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
I find it interesting that…….if we shot Sidwinders at objects the “size” of ATV’s ……wouldn’t at that size….those objects be obliterated by the high altitude explosive impact…….virtually leaving only tiny bits and pieces of debris falling and widely spreading over large areas of land and water below? In other words, there may be nothing left to discern of the objects… to find.

👽

Maybe that's exactly what the intention is. To completely obliterate these objects so they don't have to explain them. They probably don't want any piece of them falling into anybody's hands. That may let the cat out of the bag.

I've said it before. If they want to learn more about the objects they need to send up helicopter to get close up video. But I got a feeling they know exactly what they are but will never admit it.

From the History Channel…..The Proof Is Out There - Cubed-Shaped UFO

A point of reference perhaps?…….characteristics similar to the 2 objects of Alaska and Canada? (except for shapes)

February 2020….Medellin, Columbia …..UAP characteristics….mentioned

Altitude - 30,000 ft
Size - 10-15 (estimated)
Shape - Cube
Speed - To slow to be a plane or missile (at the moment of viewing)



Not so Cube when zoomed in…..the host is more correct to call it a polyhedron (a solid figure with many plane faces, typically more than six)…..and it doesn’t look like a Drone.


In Ancient Aliens lingo ……”you have to wonder”

Disregard, if you desire, the example references to the Navy “Batman” Balloon…..although for some, it wasn’t a Batman balloon.

👽