It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: Xtrozero
I couldn't find the image you posted on the page you linked.
The image you linked has nothing but numbers....what does each column represent?
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
I couldn't find the image you posted on the page you linked.
The image you linked has nothing but numbers....what does each column represent?
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: nugget1
That fits in with all the five-eyes countries having chicken problems of various sorts."Eggs are now dangerous," isn't it lucky the supply is down? No, wait if the supply is down there would be fewer heart attacks. You can't make this stuff up.
www.theglobeandmail.com...
Despite the absence of causal and exposure data, the authors make some striking claims. According to the study’s lead investigator Dr. Donald Redelmeier, “Our study demonstrated traffic risks were 50 to 70 per cent more frequent for adults who had not been vaccinated compared to those who had. This does not mean COVID-19 vaccination directly prevents traffic crashes. Instead, it suggests that adults who do not follow public health advice may also neglect the rules of the road.” A foundation of the research appears to be the belief that human behaviour is the most significant cause of traffic crashes. This leaves out two important factors in any crash – the automobile and the road. Any traffic accident is a combination of the drivers, cars and roads they use.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
I couldn't find the image you posted on the page you linked.
The image you linked has nothing but numbers....what does each column represent?
In Campell's video he is suggesting the deaths in 2022 were 20%+ more than normal. I aligned up 4 different years and if what Cambell says is true then for 2022 each month should be like 60k+ deaths per month when we compare to the other years, and they are not.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
I couldn't find the image you posted on the page you linked.
The image you linked has nothing but numbers....what does each column represent?
In Campell's video he is suggesting the deaths in 2022 were 20%+ more than normal. I aligned up 4 different years and if what Cambell says is true then for 2022 each month should be like 60k+ deaths per month when we compare to the other years, and they are not.
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
How did you come up with the 60K+ number?
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
How did you come up with the 60K+ number?
This below is the death rate per year for 2017 through 2021. Throwing out 2021 Jan/Feb with the COVID hit the average is
Avg: Jan 58k Feb 46k Mar 48k
+20%: Jan 70k Feb 55k Mar 58k
-------------------------------- Jan Feb Mar
2022 ENGLAND AND WALES 53k 46k 49k
2021 ENGLAND AND WALES 73k 59k 48k
2020 ENGLAND AND WALES 56k 43k 49k
2019 ENGLAND AND WALES 53k 45k 43k
2018 ENGLAND AND WALES 64k 49k 51k
2017 ENGLAND AND WALES 57k 47k 48k
The first 2 weeks of Jan 2023 17k deaths have been recorded, so where is that above and beyond the norm so far for Jan? Total deaths in 2022 was 576,021 so where did the 650k come from?
In the week ending 6 January 2023 (Week 1), 14,983 deaths were registered in England and Wales; 739 of these deaths mentioned "novel coronavirus (COVID-19)", accounting for 4.9% of all deaths
The number of deaths registered in the UK in the week ending 13 January 2023 (Week 2) was 19,916, which was 20.4% above the five-year average (3,377 excess deaths); of these deaths, 1,059 involved COVID-19.
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
According to the BBC from the link above the total deaths in 2022 were over 650,000 in the UK.
The pandemic years are not counted for the 5 year average I.e 2020 and 2021. And in some occasions the pandemic year 2020 is not counted but 2021 is counted. The year 2022 is not considered as a pandemic year.
Your above figure of 17K in the first two weeks of January 2023 is not correct
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
According to the BBC from the link above the total deaths in 2022 were over 650,000 in the UK.
The Government's official number that breaks it all down into every death in every district is 576,021, so where did the BBC get 650k?
The pandemic years are not counted for the 5 year average I.e 2020 and 2021. And in some occasions the pandemic year 2020 is not counted but 2021 is counted. The year 2022 is not considered as a pandemic year.
It doesn't matter. I threw out the outliers and the rest of the months are about the same as previous years, so no clue to what you are getting at.... Throw out the whole year and the previous years are about the same as is 2022. Do your own counting lol Jesus is it that hard?
Your above figure of 17K in the first two weeks of January 2023 is not correct
I stand corrected I thought 17k across two weeks was very low, so it is 15k first week and 17k second week.
UK
If we go back way before COVID to 2017 and 2018 they were 58k and 64k respectively for Jan. So, for the first two weeks of Jan 2023 we have 32k, that is right now on course with 2018, so is that a serious issue?
originally posted by: Xtrozero
a reply to: Asmodeus3
But back to my point that 32k is not so crazy of a number as it is on course with 2018 which is well outside of the pandemic.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
a reply to: Asmodeus3
But back to my point that 32k is not so crazy of a number as it is on course with 2018 which is well outside of the pandemic.
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
Yeah 32k excess deaths isn't a big deal, it's only like 10 911's. I mean if it was due to covid it would be a big deal, but since it's not, it's not a big deal.
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
There is a pattern though that has emerged since July 2022 and this is a large number of non Covid excess deaths with over 26K until the end of December and another 4K at least until the middle of January. So at least 30K non Covid excess deaths.
The important element of this pattern is that it doesn't seem to slow down and the excess non Covid deaths are much higher in the last two to three weeks.
This is the 7th month in a row with some many excess deaths and so many excess non Covid deaths.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
There is a pattern though that has emerged since July 2022 and this is a large number of non Covid excess deaths with over 26K until the end of December and another 4K at least until the middle of January. So at least 30K non Covid excess deaths.
The important element of this pattern is that it doesn't seem to slow down and the excess non Covid deaths are much higher in the last two to three weeks.
This is the 7th month in a row with some many excess deaths and so many excess non Covid deaths.
So, who is inventing the term non-COVID excessive deaths when we can compare the years and see they are not excessive anything. What do you call 64k deaths in Jan 2018 as example. Let's see how Jan plays out, OK. It really seems Cambell is trying to make something that most likely is not there.
So looking at it another way we see the average from
2004 to 2009 was 502k per year
2009 to 2014 was 503k per year
Then things started to change and by 2017 it went up to 533k, 2018 up to 539k, so something was increasing death rates, maybe population increases? IDK
2020 we saw 614k then 585k for 2021 to follow 2022 with 577k... as it drops back to a more normal number, but yes, it is still too high. It seems around 2015 and on death rates started to go up by 1% to 2% per year, so if 2018 was 539k and we add just 1.5% each year then when COVID hit in 2020 the non-COVID death rate would have been about 550k, 2021 558k and 2022 566k non-COVID... This means 2023 might be 575 non-COVID if the 1% to 2% increase per year death rate continues.
The big question is why are death rates going up even in the pre COVID and pre vaccine years? I know many here to include Cambell are say the vacc is doing it all, but this yearly increase started well before all that.
The data suggest that it is very likely that something substantial is happening,” says Michael Murphy at the London School of Economics
originally posted by: iwanttobelieve70
originally posted by: RMFX1
Nurse Cambell (He's not a medical doctor) is a fraud. I agree with the above poster on that.
Fraud
noun
wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain.
"he was convicted of fraud"
Please define your description of Dr. Campbell with evidence.
I will hang up and listen.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Do you want to guess what these reasons are?
Sure, how about reading your own damn article you linked...lol
originally posted by: RMFX1
originally posted by: iwanttobelieve70
originally posted by: RMFX1
Nurse Cambell (He's not a medical doctor) is a fraud. I agree with the above poster on that.
Fraud
noun
wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain.
"he was convicted of fraud"
Please define your description of Dr. Campbell with evidence.
I will hang up and listen.
So you're saying that Nurse Campbell saw no finacial gain as a result of his youtube covid career? Semantics. He's a grifter.