What is the infection fatality rate (IFR) of Covid 19 now?

a reply to: LordAhriman

Hospitals are still mandating the original covid 19 shots to get a job.Is it a different virus?

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: JohnThomas2

And why doesn't the media EVER mention the Infection Fatality Rate any more?

Because COVID is yesterdays news (until the next development) and there are bigger stories to highlight , like the war in Ukraine and our floundering and corrupt government.

China on the other hand are reporting 1,300 deaths in a week according to the Times.

1,300 deaths from WHAT, precisely? What was the average age of those who died? Did they die from symptoms of a respiratory infection, or did they merely have a 'positive test within 28 days' (remember that on the radio every day?) but NO respiratory infection symptoms, and thus were categorically NOT 'Covid' deaths?

They only had your alleged (I don't believe they were ever claimed to be that high) 10% mortality rate BEFORE they were testing millions of people - thus the percentage of people who died with a 'positive' Covid test, were much larger compared to the (much fewer than later on in the scamdemic) number of people who had a so-called 'Covid' test and were found to be 'positive'. (Which means nothing, as my original post proves, if 1 in 45 people had 'Covid' in the U.K. in the week up to the 9th December 2022! Where were all the dead bodies in the streets, with such a 'deadly' virus'?
What was the average age of people who died 'from' or 'with' Covid? 83 years old! What is the average life expectancy in the U.K.? 82 years old!

No it isn’t and no they didn’t lol

Your funny.

a reply to: chr0naut

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

Potatoes forget recent history pretty quickly. Italy had over a 10% mortality from Covid-19. They got the OG strain.

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

Potatoes forget recent history pretty quickly. Italy had over a 10% mortality from Covid-19. They got the OG strain.

Source?

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

Potatoes forget recent history pretty quickly. Italy had over a 10% mortality from Covid-19. They got the OG strain.

You may have missed my reply in the previous page but here it is again and contains important information



The infection fatality rate was estimated long before the vaccines became available by one of the top epidemiologists in the world and his team at Stanford, Dr John Ioannidis.

The infection fatally rate was about 0.15%

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...


Conclusions:

All systematic evaluations of seroprevalence data converge that SARS-CoV-2 infection is widely spread globally. Acknowledging residual uncertainties, the available evidence suggests average global IFR of ~0.15% and ~1.5-2.0 billion infections by February 2021 with substantial differences in IFR and in infection spread across continents, countries and locations.

Eventhough the IFR could be very different from country to country the claims it was 10% or more are just absurd.

Given the immunity we now have the IFR should be much lower

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

Potatoes forget recent history pretty quickly. Italy had over a 10% mortality from Covid-19. They got the OG strain.

You are just gaslighting everyone at this point. There was no 10% IFR ever. They tried to inflate deaths by using the deadly remdesivir /vent combo but it still wasn't even close to that. 10% refers to a propaganda number used by the media to begin the process of mass formation. It worked on you very well.

DERP!

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: chr0naut

Funny thing about PCR, it surely can detect viral RNA. What it cannot do is tell you if there is active disease process. Enter "asymptomatic" COVID or "my mango just got COVID" syndrome.

Most testing with PCR has been subsequent to symptoms of COVID. Not so much so with rapid antigen tests.

It is fairly common knowledge that rapid antigen tests show acidic things, such as fruit or cola drinks, as false positives.

Please produce some valid source that indicates it was a PCR test that was at fault in misidentifying a fruit as having SARS-CoV-2 virus. I can find no report that clearly identifies the type of test used that misidentified fruit as having COVID-19.

UK pupils use orange juice to fake ‘positive’ Covid test results - The Guardian

originally posted by: Kenzo
a reply to: chr0naut

You allways spread that false narrative here about PCR test being accurate , like about 3 years now.

Grow up

I keep saying that because it is true.

originally posted by: Dalamax
No it isn’t and no they didn’t lol

Your funny.

a reply to: chr0naut

CDC’s Influenza SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex Assay

Apparently, you are wrong.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Dalamax
No it isn’t and no they didn’t lol

Your funny.

a reply to: chr0naut

CDC’s Influenza SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex Assay

Apparently, you are wrong.

Too bad no one trusts the CDC anymore since its a vaccine company that makes billions from vaccines every year and not a regulatory agency.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Dalamax
No it isn’t and no they didn’t lol

Your funny.

a reply to: chr0naut

CDC’s Influenza SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex Assay

Apparently, you are wrong.

Too bad no one trusts the CDC anymore since its a vaccine company that makes billions from vaccines every year and not a regulatory agency.

I'm sure you could run an effective national health regulatory agency with the change you find down the back of the couch.

LOL

a reply to: chr0naut


Shill

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Dalamax
No it isn’t and no they didn’t lol

Your funny.

a reply to: chr0naut

CDC’s Influenza SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex Assay

Apparently, you are wrong.

Too bad no one trusts the CDC anymore since its a vaccine company that makes billions from vaccines every year and not a regulatory agency.

I'm sure you could run an effective national health regulatory agency with the change you find down the back of the couch.

LOL

Your arguments are again in a turmoil.

The IFR was around 0.15% before the vaccines were rolled out.

There is no evidence for what you have said.
Covid-19 isn't the Spanish Flu. It was the Spanish Flu that has an IFR of 10%. It killed around 50 million people and infected around 500 million people.

You seriously need to read before you post.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
You are just gaslighting everyone at this point. There was no 10% IFR ever. They tried to inflate deaths by using the deadly remdesivir /vent combo but it still wasn't even close to that. 10% refers to a propaganda number used by the media to begin the process of mass formation. It worked on you very well.

DERP!

Here's a screenshot I took on March 26, 2020:



Now stop eating your crayons and do the math.
What reason would Italy have to lie about it at that point?

Ventilators were used when people could no longer breathe on their own. Do you know what happens when people can't breathe? I personally know 4 people who were put on ventilators. 3 lived, 1 died.

originally posted by: Lemon1234

Hospitals are still mandating the original covid 19 shots to get a job.Is it a different virus?

Figure of speech.

Nah. I’m correct

PCR tests are useless.

An improved useless test is still useless.

A corona virus is a cold with a good publicity team.
Well. As good as it gets when your cheerleaders are talking heads and politicians.

Your still funny.

a reply to: chr0naut

a reply to: JohnThomas2
I agree with the sentiment but.....

The only way we will ever know how many had covid might be from seroprevalence studies. But we won't know who had it when, or who actually died from it.

The data is a mess (purposely IMO) and the pcr test proxy was chosen to scaremonger and help the narrative.

originally posted by: Dalamax
A corona virus is a cold with a good publicity team.

MERS is a coronavirus with a 34% mortality rate. "JuSt A C0Ld!"