It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Dalamax
So she died with a Darwin Award.
a reply to: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AaarghZombies
Well what did she die from then?
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: iwanttobelieve70
That link you provided says 12.5 per 10,000...... that's 1 in 800.
1 serious adverse reaction per 800 vaccinees!!!
The vaccines are still in use eventhough the serious adverse reactions is a massive 12.5 per 10,000 vaccinees.
Evidence showing the COVID shots are a public health disaster keeps mounting. In late December 2022, Steve Kirsch1 and Jessica Rose,2 Ph.D., both published Substack articles detailing some of the latest evidence showing the shots are destroying people’s immune systems and have triggered an avalanche of turbo-charged cancers.
Cancer rates have increased since the introduction of the COVID shots and is one of the top three leading causes of premature death among younger adults — a trend that in turn is driving down U.S. life expectancy.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: iwanttobelieve70
That link you provided says 12.5 per 10,000...... that's 1 in 800.
1 serious adverse reaction per 800 vaccinees!!!
The vaccines are still in use eventhough the serious adverse reactions is a massive 12.5 per 10,000 vaccinees.
12.5 per 10,000 is better known as 0.12 percent.
That actually quite a small number. Especially if you go back to the source document and read it properly. 1 in 4 of those 12.5 in 10,000 people were actually in the placebo group. So you're actually looking at 0.09 percent, and even then some of them had actually covid so it wasn't a Vax reaction at all. Others were later found to have other causes unrelated to the vax as well.
This brings it close to the 0.02 percent risk found in the Israeli study in my signature.
So, even your worst case is less that the risk is a fraction of a percent.
Especially if you go back to the source document and read it properly. 1 in 4 of those 12.5 in 10,000 people were actually in the placebo group.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Seems like a funny way to cover deaths up, having public inquests and paying compensation.
Your just adding proof that a small number of people have died and that governments are admitting to them.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: iwanttobelieve70
That link you provided says 12.5 per 10,000...... that's 1 in 800.
1 serious adverse reaction per 800 vaccinees!!!
The vaccines are still in use eventhough the serious adverse reactions is a massive 12.5 per 10,000 vaccinees.
12.5 per 10,000 is better known as 0.12 percent.
That actually quite a small number. Especially if you go back to the source document and read it properly. 1 in 4 of those 12.5 in 10,000 people were actually in the placebo group. So you're actually looking at 0.09 percent, and even then some of them had actually covid so it wasn't a Vax reaction at all. Others were later found to have other causes unrelated to the vax as well.
This brings it close to the 0.02 percent risk found in the Israeli study in my signature.
So, even your worst case is less that the risk is a fraction of a percent.
Denmark said on Monday it would not include the Covid-19 vaccine from US drugmaker Johnson & Johnson in its national vaccination campaign, citing worries over serious side effects involving blood clots.
The Danish Health Authority has concluded that the benefits of using the Covid-19 vaccine from Johnson & Johnson do not outweigh the risk of causing the possible adverse effect... in those who receive the vaccine," the authority said in a statement.
"Therefore, the Danish Health Authority will continue the Danish mass vaccination programme against Covid-19 without the Covid-19 vaccine from Johnson & Johnson," it added
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AaarghZombies
Especially if you go back to the source document and read it properly. 1 in 4 of those 12.5 in 10,000 people were actually in the placebo group.
Can you copy and paste the bit from the source document, that I should read properly...... that confirms what you state please?
I apologize, but I can't seem to find what you are pointing out. I will endeavour to read the direct quote that you will provide for me (in your reply to me), until I understand what you are getting at.
Thanks in advance.
15 part thread exposing potential corruption and collusion within the province of Saskatchewan involving vaccine adverse events including death and the suppression of data